TimisaMonster 31,073 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Not for 200K... I'm not a Government Hooker :derpga: Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UrethraFranklin 434 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Their parents would kill them if they found out they refused. Would burn all their Gaga CD's lol. omg theyd be disowned instantly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyHigh 0 Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 So you would? Wouldn't you feel some sort of urge to listen to all the music she has released so far at some point? Or wouldn't you be super curious to listen to any future Gaga albums. In a heartbeat. I would probably do it for 50k I need some help atm lol. I listen to hundreds of albums yearly, I'd be fine without listening to the new Gaga record. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cameron Dallas 11 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 It's not even that much money tbh. There isn't much I would do for that Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatica 7,031 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Yea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carrot stick 0 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essence 232 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 There's ton's of great albums a year, you'd get over it within a year tbh. You're not thinking this through properly.. I guess Gaga doesn't mean as much to you as some others who find something very unique about her. Still not gonna over your post about age limits. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seringai 248 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Hm No, I'd be stress if someday she made Grunge Album and i can't listen to her.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyHigh 0 Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 It's not even that much money tbh. There isn't much I would do for that To stop listening to one artist I figured it was 10x as much. Thought anything higher would be a guaranteed yes I initially thought 200k was too high and everyone would say yes. Surprised, I underestimated your stanmanships. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quark 7,098 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 Well, than I think this depends on how much you need the money and how big of a Gaga fan you are. Because if you are a big Gaga fan, no other artist or music could ever replace Gaga's as good as the other music may be. Also, I guess if I really was desperate for money I might consider it, but with my current situation and with doubt amount, my answer is honestly no. In a heartbeat. I would probably do it for 50k I need some help atm lol. I listen to hundreds of albums yearly, I'd be fine without listening to the new Gaga record. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Gangsta 49 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 200k? I'd spend it all by the end of the week. No way I would ever give up Gaga. I love her music too much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyHigh 0 Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 I guess Gaga doesn't mean as much to you as some others who find something very unique about her. Still not gonna over your post about age limits. I did that with the best intentions in mind. My approach may have been wrong but I truly meant no harm. You guys have no idea the type of stuff that goes on in the internet daily if you think I was that wrong with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essence 232 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 I did that with the best intentions in mind. My approach may have been wrong but I truly meant no harm. You guys have no idea the type of stuff that goes on in the internet daily if you think I was that wrong with that. It's one thing to call one person out for being creepy. It's a whole other ball game when you say there should be an age limit restricting people (who are around Gaga's age) from being on a website. Just because there is one perv, doesn't mean everyone who has a fully developed brain at the age of 30 and up is a pedophile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyHigh 0 Posted February 20, 2014 Author Share Posted February 20, 2014 It's one thing to call one person out for being creepy. It's a whole other ball game when you say there should be an age limit restricting people (who are around Gaga's age) from being on a website. Just because there is one perv, doesn't mean everyone who has a fully developed brain at the age of 30 and up is a pedophile. My approach may have been wrong, I apologize for that. I have a tendency to over exaggerate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MahoTheMnstr 141 Posted February 20, 2014 Share Posted February 20, 2014 what that's not enough! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.