Awakened M 3,040 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Umm...wow. That was unexpected. The way they dissed her vocals, and how they're only in it for the money is really distasteful. I'm surprised Gaga still went with it. They even seem really ashamed that it's happening! How hard is it to be polite? So-called adults need to grow up. :toofloppy: I'm not getting any sleep tonight because I woke up to a beautiful life. I'm awake. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Katy Perry 1 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Mess. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayCart 8 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Wow.... Uggh i hate rude little twat hipsters like these. Get a grip! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SinAgain 33 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Get that promo Gags. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djBuffoon 12,098 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 It would be awesome if Gaga puts Aura feat. Infected Mushroom on iTunes and sales it for free. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RitaOral 1,322 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 (edited) Wow assholes. I hate hipsters like this. Even though Aura was my favourite i'm praying she doesn't release it as a single now so these pricks make as less money as possible. She should show them up by releasing it free or something. Edited October 5, 2013 by CakeLike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
INNA 3,637 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Well considering their "track" sounds like a chintzy, garage band Mariachi piece-of-**** monstrosity, they should be honored that she wants to grace them with her vocals. fragment-fragment--bul-uh...scab-uh..fragment-foot, bullet fragment foot bich! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
htrllllsem 14 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 Lol fuck ´em Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKANK 14,288 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 They are allowed to be hipster doofuses and limit the scope of their work all the want, if they find something particularly embarrassing about reaching a larger audience then so be it...that is their prerogative, we aren't going to change that. However... They aren't happy with the finished product, and yet Gaga is releasing it? So she expects Cher to not release their collaboration when it doesn't meet her artistic merits but she can't extend that same courtesy to someone like Infected Mushroom? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
inuborg 4,136 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 I don't understand, they want to avoid commercialism, and yet they sold THIER track to gaga for all the money they'll get out of it.... And how they gonna sell the track away and then play it during their shows... I root for you. I love you. You, you, you, you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyFlo 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 They can go die. Why would they say such things to the queen of music. Do they even understand the amount of money their going to make off it. They should be thanking her, not shading her! This is quite degrading to this fanbase, and Gaga herself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
N0LAN 0 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 I'm glad they didn't sugarcoat things to be honest. I can understand their perspective, not wanting to fall in with the modern day candy junk 'pop' scene and be associated with commercial artists, but I don't think they realize how talented and innovatve Gaga herself actually is. Being a narrow minded hipster who apposes to anything mainstream is stupid and senseless, sometimes mainstream isn't a bad thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 680 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 However... They aren't happy with the finished product, and yet Gaga is releasing it? So she expects Cher to not release their collaboration when it doesn't meet her artistic merits but she can't extend that same courtesy to someone like Infected Mushroom? I think Rancid Toadstool still want the track released to make money, but they want to b---h and feel superior too. Anyway, it's a matter of contract. If Cher obtained the rights to a Gaga song, she could sing it however she likes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoLilMonster 17 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 *qouting Stefani Tanner*: How RUDE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKANK 14,288 Posted October 5, 2013 Share Posted October 5, 2013 I think Rancid Toadstool still want the track released to make money, but they want to b---h and feel superior too. Anyway, it's a matter of contract. If Cher obtained the rights to a Gaga song, she could sing it however she likes. You are probably right. They want it both ways. They want to cash in, but are slagging off the song in order to save their "credibility". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts