Infected Mushroom talks "Aura"

[U-GO-BOY 1,589]

:megaflop: Gaga, don't ever give them the pleasure of releasing Aura as an actual single.

Better yet, scrap it. If there was ever something she should trash, it's Aura. Done with this messy ass song.

She should actually do the opposite and release it as a single. They would be getting more "cheap" fans and fame. Give me what they are avoiding the most

[Dann 354]

I'm on my way to fuk some assholes up.

Don't tell anyone.

[wiltedbliss 914]

If "Mushroom" is a metaphor for "brain", then indeed, their mushroom is infected :yes:

[Kim Kardashian 2,708]

[Emvee 7,080]

And what's this about Zedd saying "there's a problem?"

 

Am I gonna have to burn my copy of Clarity?

Do I sense a feigning little **** here?

[MelbHawker 6,217]

Selling your song to an act you say is cheap, and then not even wanting the name of your brand in the credits is not what 'high artistic integrity' is. 

This. That comment of theirs really pissed me off.

[Emvee 7,080]

She should actually do the opposite and release it as a single. They would be getting more "cheap" fans and fame. Give me what they are avoiding the most

 

Makes no sense.

[absolutelyfab 0]

Well this certainly didn't improve my narrow minded view on indie musicians as arrogant and pretentious :toofloppy:

[Nemo 3,968]

Wow ****ing hipster assholes

This.

Well, at least they were honest.

On the contrary, they came in with a completely dismissive and hostile attitude towards Gaga, so I'd say they didn't fairly evaluate what she did with the song. Their opinion is invalid.

Personally though, if I were Gaga and I read this, I'd be happy to strip "Infected Mushroom" from the credits. They don't want the promo, and they don't deserve it.

[teo 609]

lol slim chance. 

 

yet they'll still be laughing their asses off all the way to the bank. 

Meh let these flopsters have their Gaga pity cash. We all know she's so much better than them and their integrity.

[Katie 65]

Scrap it. We already have it anyway, for the most part.  Or just lower the security on it so someone else can leak it.

Edited October 5, 2013 by Katie

[Didymus 32,760]

Who wouldn't take that money though Be honest, please. I understand their position completely.

[Young Pancake 691]

Cheap? Do you want to talk about being cheap?

[NewYorkCity 10,462]

Oh look you are so hipster, you are in another level omg your artistry and creativity are so amazing. Your integrity with music is so strong infected mushroom

 

"avoid commercialization" You give your music for free 

 

Unless you get money, then all your integrity and artistry goes down. Right?

This is pathetic, they could have say no.

 

End of the history.

[Nissa 51]

The funniest thing is that they though that the original was more artistic that Aura when it was just an instrumental. Of course you can call a sound artistic because everyone can imagine it differently. But the question is who truly dares to give that sound shape and personality. Gaga did it and they criticized her for that but they would never dare to do that. They are hiding behind their hipster illusion.

 

Exactly!   Agreed with every single sentence there. These hypocritical snobby people would never be able to dream up the vision and artistry behind the very fabric Gaga's Aura is made of! They wouldn't dare produce a sweeping, rich and cultivated work with an actual identity akin to anything Gaga has been tirelessly and continuously putting out for years and years while perfecting her artistic vision and evolving at nearly the speed of light. Let alone that these idiots would ever be able to reach Aura's richness, texture and personality on their own.

 

Their lack of respect and their complete lack of shame and humility (apparently) is boorish and downright disgusting, while their arrogance is, frankly, laughable.

Edited October 5, 2013 by Nissa