Jump to content

Nick Knight Outtake - Highest Quality


8847759385

Featured Posts

Darcklighter22

It is upscaled. I took the 1200x1200 version, upscaled it to 2500, and you get this: 7FdOI.jpg Compare that in full view to the one he posted. Exactly the same. FAKE :nails:

this :yes: didn't get the circular pattern that was present when zooming in, since pixels are square and not suppose to be round but makes sense now..yup it's upscaled , but it's all good 1200x1200 isn't bad :)

FLAWLESS PHOTOSHOOT :legend: The photoshots isn't very sharp... look at the UHQ Motorcycle... or the UHQ Monster Ball Paparazzi Pyro-Bra photo... they're a little blur... but yeah.. this looks like the awful quality of the Digital Booklet pictures

if you mean the smoke and mirrors photo well yeah each segment of the err 30 some photo was it? where around 18 MB, but the MB paparazzi pyro bra photo depends how the photographer shot most likely in JPEG and not RAW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

this :yes: didn't get the circular pattern that was present when zooming in, since pixels are square and not suppose to be round but makes sense now..yup it's upscaled , but it's all good 1200x1200 isn't bad :)

if you mean the smoke and mirrors photo well yeah each segment of the err 30 some photo was it? where around 18 MB, but the MB paparazzi pyro bra photo depends how the photographer shot most likely in JPEG and not RAW.

Or maybe the camera didn't focus quite well, because the rest of the photos are quite sharp. (Except the LoveGame one, but it's because it's focused on the discostick).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much. It's gorgeous. All of the BTW outtakes are flawless :bunny:

fragment-fragment--bul-uh...scab-uh..fragment-foot, bullet fragment foot bich!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Darcklighter22

Or maybe the camera didn't focus quite well, because the rest of the photos are quite sharp. (Except the LoveGame one, but it's because it's focused on the discostick).

that's true, specially if he shot with an aperture of around 5.6 or 8 those don't give you much depth of field to play with! still stunning photos regardless tho :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ellie Goulding

It is upscaled.

I took the 1200x1200 version, upscaled it to 2500, and you get this:

7FdOI.jpg

Compare that in full view to the one he posted. Exactly the same.

FAKE :nails:

:legend: I feel like the tea pot has been stolen, thrown on the ground, and stomped on. Flooding the floor with tea.

Link to post
Share on other sites

crazystairs827

Your welcome :confuse:

I give you what you want and I get laughed at. That is rude in all honesty.

Thanks for posting this picture :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a great picture, and it's amazing to be getting more from the BTW shoot, shame this is upscaled

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...