dirtypunx 0 Posted July 12, 2013 Share Posted July 12, 2013 I can't imagine that more people searched for ARTPOP rather than osama bin ladens death, MDNA, or Michael Jackson's death lol why would you include that album in this response though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
twigs42 0 Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 468 millie queen slays Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SharGaga 2,689 Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Can't be true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born Brave 2,072 Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 lol why would you include that album in this response though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
croboy 1,212 Posted July 15, 2013 Share Posted July 15, 2013 If I google "ARTPOP" I get 7'040'000 results in 0.25 seconds ?! Anyway, this thread makes it look like over 4'000'000 people were searching FOR ARTPOP in less than a second and I don't believe that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfMark 4,107 Posted July 17, 2013 Share Posted July 17, 2013 awesome!! get back on top of everything gaga!!!! -Mark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEANGT 4,709 Posted July 18, 2013 Share Posted July 18, 2013 ...this sounds like someone misinterpreted when Google tells you how many results it got and how fast for your searches. lmaoooo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughdancy 282 Posted July 23, 2013 Share Posted July 23, 2013 This doesn't make any sense... the way it's worded is like when you google 'Lady Gaga' or whatever. Underneath the search bar, it shows you how many results there are, and how long it took to deliver the content to you. Example, I just googled Lady Gaga and got this: "About 257,000,000 results (0.23 seconds)" That doesn't mean that 257,000,000 people googled her in 0.23 seconds, or that 257,000,000 things about her were posted in 0.23 seconds. All it means is that Google has indexed 257,000,000 results, and delivered them to you in 0.23 seconds. If we do the same with ARTPOP, we get this: "About 4,220,000 results (0.11 seconds)" All this means is that Google has indexed 4,220,000 results for ARTPOP and has given me that information in 0.11 seconds. So this "record" that she broke is 1) probably not real 2) isn't really a record at all. All it's saying is that person had 0.19 seconds of ping between their computer and Google... :megaflop: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Euphorae 0 Posted July 26, 2013 Share Posted July 26, 2013 Woah..... :legend: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 5,692 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 omg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,650 Posted July 29, 2013 Share Posted July 29, 2013 Wow she is so flop yeah? :classy: (ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bellatrix 34,639 Posted July 31, 2013 Share Posted July 31, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Born To Slay 10,996 Posted August 1, 2013 Share Posted August 1, 2013 On google trend ARTPOP is a huge hit but lady Gagas name is fading Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.