Blue Dream 11 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Guys, 3:04 obviously signifies the 3rd century of the 4th millennium. We'll have to time travel to get ARTPOP. Probably to GOAT. Intergalactic fun #FreshNewSoundOf4313 #AlbumOfTheDecade Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypocrateen 107 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 No we have to look forward to both the 30th of April and the 3rd of May because someone says it appears on 3:04 and others on 3:05. Possibilities No seriously, I don't even care Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exoskeleton123 6 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 This No we have to look forward to both the 30th of April and the 3rd of May because someone says it appears on 3:04 and others on 3:05. Possibilities No seriously, I don't even care Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTPOP Gypsy 3 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 In the edited frame it looks like Gaga has the hair bump Lana usually uses, like this: It's hard to tell who is the person next to her, but I'm guessing it could be Beyoncé, Lacee, or even Tara, her cheekbones are very prominent when smmiling, too. It looks like a still from a music video or a video preview for promo, that will start the ARTPOP era. It's not the first time Gaga and/or her team reverse an image. Remember the Alejandro teaser? She did reverse the scene where she was on the bed dressed as a nun. 0:19: Obviously she wants to give us more info, but maybe the label is not letting her. Waiting for the correct timing to release the lead single, I guess. I completely forgot about that with the Alejandro teaser. You can't convince me that it's not intentional. Now I'm sitting here making my own theory and messing with the picture. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick4bty 2,758 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Okay guys, hear me out. This is really important. So I'm currently working on a video project for one of my classes. I'm working in Final Cut. When we went to publish the video, it came out wacky - and randomly, out of nowhere, an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip for 20 frames. When I saw that, I was in complete shock - because this is virtually the same thing that happened here. When I went to google it, apparently the "Final Cut random flicker" is a problem that a lot of people have. And I still have no idea how it happened. This image being placed into the time lapse video may not have been intentional at all, and may have just been a random technical error that no one saw before publishing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cometoogg 0 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 (edited) Okay guys, hear me out. This is really important. So I'm currently working on a video project for one of my classes. I'm working in Final Cut. When we went to publish the video, it came out wacky - and randomly, out of nowhere, an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip for 20 frames. When I saw that, I was in complete shock - because this is virtually the same thing that happened here. When I went to google it, apparently the "Final Cut random flicker" is a problem that a lot of people have. And I still have no idea how it happened. This image being placed into the time lapse video may not have been intentional at all, and may have just been a random technical error that no one saw before publishing. But why is the picture edited Edited April 28, 2013 by rhythmico Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
drew 17 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Okay guys, hear me out. This is really important. So I'm currently working on a video project for one of my classes. I'm working in Final Cut. When we went to publish the video, it came out wacky - and randomly, out of nowhere, an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip for 20 frames. When I saw that, I was in complete shock - because this is virtually the same thing that happened here. When I went to google it, apparently the "Final Cut random flicker" is a problem that a lot of people have. And I still have no idea how it happened. This image being placed into the time lapse video may not have been intentional at all, and may have just been a random technical error that no one saw before publishing. There is a slim chance that is true I guess, but it doesn't explain the origin of the pic (IE it doesn't match anything we've seen of Gaga) or why the pic was heavily edited. Also the fact they made the vid unlisted and only posted it on LM.com is suspicious too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTPOP Gypsy 3 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVL3wkUFJQQ That was a nice break from reading this thread. Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samulated 11 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 It might also hint at the release being on the 304th day of the year, which would be 31 October, Halloween That is a possibility tho Like I'd still be pretty excited about that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARTPOP Gypsy 3 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Okay guys, hear me out. This is really important. So I'm currently working on a video project for one of my classes. I'm working in Final Cut. When we went to publish the video, it came out wacky - and randomly, out of nowhere, an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip for 20 frames. When I saw that, I was in complete shock - because this is virtually the same thing that happened here. When I went to google it, apparently the "Final Cut random flicker" is a problem that a lot of people have. And I still have no idea how it happened. This image being placed into the time lapse video may not have been intentional at all, and may have just been a random technical error that no one saw before publishing. Why would it be heavily edited though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthagio 113 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 "an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip" Yeah, except the image shown in the timelapse video has absolutely nothing to do with the video itself and is purposely edited so you can't see anything in detail, so... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneyFameSex 1 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I FOUND A MATCH!!!!!!!!!! also when playing with the image with burn tool this showed up on the back and in the front Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sagerauru 1 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Okay guys, hear me out. This is really important. So I'm currently working on a video project for one of my classes. I'm working in Final Cut. When we went to publish the video, it came out wacky - and randomly, out of nowhere, an image used later in the video appeared in the middle of the opening video clip for 20 frames. When I saw that, I was in complete shock - because this is virtually the same thing that happened here. When I went to google it, apparently the "Final Cut random flicker" is a problem that a lot of people have. And I still have no idea how it happened. This image being placed into the time lapse video may not have been intentional at all, and may have just been a random technical error that no one saw before publishing. Even if it was a bug that caused the frame to appear where it did, that still doesn't explain how the frame ended up in the project to begin with. Like Drew said above, there are still other suspicious aspects of that frame that aren't explained by a bug such as the copious amounts of editing done to the frame to make it impossible to recover any real detail. I also find it very difficult to believe that the video wasn't proofed for errors such as these prior to publishing it. The frame is not difficult to spot and if it were not intentional, the video wouldn't have gone up with the frame in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RougeLippystick 0 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Even if it was a bug that caused the frame to appear where it did, that still doesn't explain how the frame ended up in the project to begin with. Like Drew said above, there are still other suspicious aspects of that frame that aren't explained by a bug such as the copious amounts of editing done to the frame to make it impossible to recover any real detail. I also find it very difficult to believe that the video wasn't proofed for errors such as these prior to publishing it. The frame is not difficult to spot and if it were not intentional, the video wouldn't have gone up with the frame in it. :clap: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hypocrateen 107 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Gaga, Lady Gaga Frame Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts