Breaking news: Britney 25th Anniversary Edition will get a CD release in January

[Ayesha Erotica 2,028]

So I wrote to the record label and requested a CD version as did, presumably, hundreds of other fans, too. 

Usually, no one listens to us...  but this time, the label has responded!  They told me they "consider it". 

The 25th-anniversary re-release of Britney was originally planned only as a vinyl and digital release, but as of today, a CD version has also been announced.

I was skeptical at first, but it's actually listed on Amazon.

Proof: https://amzn.eu/d/0cybz3Za

And well, Amazon is a credible source.

It will be released as a CD on 22nd Janaury 2027. 

I loved the original album and I am waiting for this one. 

Britney is beautifully hopeful, lovely, full of anticipation, wonderful, melodic, just great and the new version will even be better and have more. 

Especially, "I'm not a Girl, Not Yet A Woman" has a special meaning for teenage girls and trans people. Bombastic Love is very cool. When I Found You is Heaven-Like. So many pearls. The album is not dance-mega-energetic but good in its own way and perhaps a pop masterpiece. 

Now let's party girls and gays 

We're gonna get a CD  We are going to Barbados, whoahh, we're gonna have another Britney CD whoahh 

 

 

Edited Thursday at 08:51 PM by Ayesha Erotica

[phantasmas 12,529]

yaaaas!! this was the first Britney album i bought with my own $ when i was 9 y/o, can't wait to buy it again 

[DESTROY UR DISEASE 22,429]

28 minutes ago, Ayesha Erotica said:

Bombastic Love is very cool. When I Found You is Heaven-Like.

and do not forget about Cinderella

[LG10 14,260]

and its already leaked

[Purrrrrr 18,753]

Breaking news?  This isn't even Britney it's whoever owns the music right?  

[StarstruckIllusion 54,035]

Omggg the 5 new tracks??? I love the demos for 3 of them. Wasn’t around when this album came out but it’s a slapper

[Ayesha Erotica 2,028]

17 hours ago, Purrrrrr said:

Breaking news?  This isn't even Britney it's whoever owns the music right?  

Here's how I see it: Britney voluntarily sold her music rights, thereby accepting and agreeing to the (re-)release of unreleased songs as well as existing songs in her name. She was paid in advance for this (whether that was a good or bad decision is another question). And now we're getting the expanded album(s), for which she was essentially already paid in advance $200 million and to whom she had previously given permission, so we can add it to our collection and Britney is a very Britney album, they are all sung by the real Britney.  I think that's morally okay and fine. It's not a robbery of Britney, it's a deal. These are genuine Britney songs and they're from that era.

I don't think it's appropriate to say that Britney doesn't financially benefit from this, because she received $200 million in advance and the label will now follow through on its investment, of course. They would have paid her less if they weren't allowed to release anything new. So Britney agreed to the release of the unreleased songs. It still adds to her legacy and still is promo.

I also don't think it's appropriate to say that the new enhanced album is "less real", because all Britney albums have always been finally determined by the executive directors and the label anyway; only the timing of payment changes now (Britney is more Britney than Britney Jean).

Releasing unreleased songs is now the only way to get new songs, unless Britney changes her mind to make totally new music, so if we get something new of the older stuff, it's nice to get.

Edited Friday at 04:11 PM by Ayesha Erotica

[Purrrrrr 18,753]

7 hours ago, Ayesha Erotica said:

Here's how I see it: Britney voluntarily sold her music rights, thereby accepting and agreeing to the (re-)release of unreleased songs as well as existing songs in her name. She was paid in advance for this (whether that was a good or bad decision is another question). And now we're getting the expanded album(s), for which she was essentially already paid in advance $200 million and to whom she had previously given permission, so we can add it to our collection and Britney is a very Britney album, they are all sung by the real Britney.  I think that's morally okay and fine. It's not a robbery of Britney, it's a deal. These are genuine Britney songs and they're from that era.

I don't think it's appropriate to say that Britney doesn't financially benefit from this, because she received $200 million in advance and the label will now follow through on its investment, of course. They would have paid her less if they weren't allowed to release anything new. So Britney agreed to the release of the unreleased songs. It still adds to her legacy and still is promo.

I also don't think it's appropriate to say that the new enhanced album is "less real", because all Britney albums have always been finally determined by the executive directors and the label anyway; only the timing of payment changes now (Britney is more Britney than Britney Jean).

Releasing unreleased songs is now the only way to get new songs, unless Britney changes her mind to make totally new music, so if we get something new of the older stuff, it's nice to get.

that's a lot of text that doesn't really say much but yes, ok, i get it, i disagree 

[DrKindnessKunt2005 6,530]

Are there any songs that sound similar to Before the Goodbye? It’s literally one of my favorite Britney songs I discovered not too long ago. 

[nATAH 59,863]

this has a bad world vinyl variant btw, blue liquid filled disc and a bright pink disc