Beyonce for i-D Magazine Cécred Edition

[Teletubby 165,075]

https://i-d.co/article/beyonce-cecred-zine/

 

 

“I’m the founder, visionary and sole investor — not the face or model for this brand,” she added. “I had a vision to build something that solved real problems and performed so incredibly that the people who can’t stand my music still use Cécred, haaaa! … because it works.”

 

Edited 13 hours ago by Teletubby

[Mr Oak 7,781]

How come she's 2/3 legs and inverted ombre?

[Lucas 31,978]

5 minutes ago, Mr Oak said:

How come she's 2/3 legs and inverted ombre?

Yeah the first thing I noticed was the legs too, they are so edited they don't look real at all lmao

[PEZ 6,665]

I'd say she looks great if they would've let her have normal human proportions. Where's her torso?

[Lord Mayhem 3,789]

13 minutes ago, Mr Oak said:

How come she's 2/3 legs and inverted ombre?

[gagzus 27,267]

From a design standpoint l, if this is for her haircare line; then the hair should be the focus. WHY have they chosen a full-body shot? Design is a language. The picture shouldve been a headshot/closeup with her hair being the focus.

[Roughhouse Dandy 14,172]

Stun

[Roughhouse Dandy 14,172]

23 minutes ago, Mr Oak said:

How come she's 2/3 legs and inverted ombre?

Shadow and her pose. 

[RAMROD 118,474]

37 minutes ago, Mr Oak said:

 inverted ombre?

 

13 minutes ago, Roughhouse Dandy said:

Shadow and her pose. 

Are stocking really that new to y'all? Not sure if you are joking 

[Ricardo 8,281]

24 minutes ago, gagzus said:

From a design standpoint l, if this is for her haircare line; then the hair should be the focus. WHY have they chosen a full-body shot? Design is a language. The picture shouldve been a headshot/closeup with her hair being the focus.

yeah, it’s weird. Also, the hair styling... I mean, I don’t really see the appeal of the wet look. That’s literally what everyone’s hair looks like when it’s wet  What is Cécred actually supposed to do about that? Sell the product, Miss Bey

[Duella Dvil 12,726]

36 minutes ago, RAMROD said:

 

Are stocking really that new to y'all? Not sure if you are joking 

Came here to say this like?!?!?!

[bxr 3,604]

Everything about this feels disjointed … from copy to creative direction … but, as they say: nothing is too [ cecred ] to withhold from the marketplace of ideas—a vision that works! 

[phantasmas 12,495]

might order it because they're numbered and so i can see the other images 

[nATAH 59,484]

2 hours ago, gagzus said:

From a design standpoint l, if this is for her haircare line; then the hair should be the focus. WHY have they chosen a full-body shot? Design is a language. The picture shouldve been a headshot/closeup with her hair being the focus.

my guess is a full body beyonce shoot would sell better than just some headshots, then they can get the name out there

[Roughhouse Dandy 14,172]

2 hours ago, RAMROD said:

 

Are stocking really that new to y'all? Not sure if you are joking 

No, its not a new concept to me, bb and if its embarassingly obvious that the answer is stockings I'm sorry to report I wasn't joking. The texture and her hips didn't look like stockings and her toe cracks don't look covered. She's lit mainly from above and her fur is chunky so I thought it was casting a shadow on her lower half. Oops

 

Either way the harsh critiques in the thread are weird.