Mother is Mothering: Gaga Welcomes First Child With Michael Polansky

[culturalbaptism 2,998]

Not a peep from her? She truly hates us 

By that time in the 2000s we would have a magazine issue with the pictures of the baby and an interview telling us all about it 

[gagzus 24,805]

1 hour ago, culturalbaptism said:

Not a peep from her? She truly hates us 

By that time in the 2000s we would have a magazine issue with the pictures of the baby and an interview telling us all about it 

Let’s thank god that doesn’t happen anymore tbh. It’s extremely invasive. 

I’d be happy if she never tells us outrightly (she never really did tell us about Michael after all) and I know she would want to keep their child out of the spotlight as much as possible. 

[princedeeblebleble 3,790]

2 hours ago, culturalbaptism said:

Not a peep from her? She truly hates us 

By that time in the 2000s we would have a magazine issue with the pictures of the baby and an interview telling us all about it 

She's saving it for the 2030 interviews when LG8 comes out when both the Baby and Michael get all possible musical credits  
 

Spoiler

"I could have never created this piece of music without the baby screams and Michael stepping in to help me with this little fvcker! so the screams reminded me of that Fan from brazil screeching GAGAAAAAAAAAA in front of my hotel room, as does my little monster, so I thought, it's time to feed my monsters along with my bebe and Michael, so now I'm here, mothering the music scene again" 

 

[Red 99,495]

5 hours ago, PartySick said:

What...what's wrong with Leos?

Nothing wrong with Leos alone, but a Virgo child of an Aries and a Leo? It’s chaos!!!

[AVeryGagaHolyDick 32,270]

Some medias are posting the uncensored pics of the baby’s face…  Not that it’s important, but I don’t think Gaga would like that, and how the hell did they get those pics?

[Starmie25 22,804]

 

[Sarah H 4,419]

1 hour ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said:

Some medias are posting the uncensored pics of the baby’s face…  Not that it’s important, but I don’t think Gaga would like that, and how the hell did they get those pics?

The papers would have bought the uncensored originals from Backgrid. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Sarah H

[AVeryGagaHolyDick 32,270]

9 minutes ago, Sarah H said:

The papers would have bought the uncensored originals from Backgrid. 

I thought Gaga was the one who told Backgrid to blur the pics… 

[Elizabeth 751]

Delighted for her and Michael! 

She's spoken many times in the past about how she wanted children so the fact she has been able to start her family is wonderful!

[Sarah H 4,419]

24 minutes ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said:

I thought Gaga was the one who told Backgrid to blur the pics… 

In this case it seems as if it's just different editorial decisions, seeing as some blurred the photos and others didn't. 

[Lemon Blood 663]

The only negative emotion I’ve felt from this news is that I regret not becoming a fan much earlier. Like during Born This Way or ARTPOP. 

Although I’ve felt this for a long time, it doesn’t really have anything to do with her baby. I’m extremely happy for her and Michael. I know they really wanted this

[JohnPokerface 992]

14 minutes ago, Lemon Blood said:

The only negative emotion I’ve felt from this news is that I regret not becoming a fan much earlier. Like during Born This Way or ARTPOP. 

So when did you became a fan?

[blueberry kisses 10,264]

2 hours ago, AVeryGagaHolyDick said:

Some medias are posting the uncensored pics of the baby’s face…  Not that it’s important, but I don’t think Gaga would like that, and how the hell did they get those pics?

I saw that in the “Lady Gaga Aging” thread The baby is so cute, but their face should be blurred.