nkta 706 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago (edited) At the time of its release DWUW was considered a misstep for Gaga - because of R. Kelly controversy, plus messy MV which ended up being scrapped altogether. Eventually Gaga removed DWUW from the album entirely - even though it was always fans’s favorite! So, who should’ve been featured instead on the song? Someone who could’ve made song a hit it deserved to be? And of course - someone who wouldn’t need to be scrapped from the album lol Edited 13 hours ago by nkta Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dynamite 67,324 Posted 13 hours ago Share Posted 13 hours ago Usher was registered to be on the song, not sure if he actually recorded it but I'd like to hear that Like a poem said by a neydy in red 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 24,430 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago (edited) Nobody. The only person I would’ve accepted on it had he still been alive was Michael Jackson. Edited 12 hours ago by gagzus 2 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherry Blues 478 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Usher, Justin Timberlake, Adam Lambert, Justin Biber....i can't imagine that. She is another kind of artist. T.I or Pharell Williams were big in 2013, one of them. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weed 79,197 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Bruno's voice probably fits the best but I'll say Macy Gray 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duella Dvil 11,799 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago NO ONE the lyrics ONLY make sense for what she went through pre-ARTPOP era The lyrics that were added by R Kelly are ... irrelevant to the core message of the song Gaga wrote. www.instagram.com/theduella666 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PornoDanceFight 2,260 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 7 minutes ago, Duella Dvil said: NO ONE the lyrics ONLY make sense for what she went through pre-ARTPOP era Thank you for speaking truth to power, sister. The solo version clears any feature, official or imagined. A solo version of the song would make it integral to her ethos as an artist, especially for what followed post-ARTPOP, imo. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy scheisse 23,038 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Those options make me SCREAM lmao. Literally none of them… 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horny Chicken 11,050 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 22 minutes ago, gagzus said: Nobody. The only person I would’ve accepted on it had he still been alive was Michael Jackson. I came here to say Michael Jackson too. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkta 706 Posted 12 hours ago Author Share Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, Duella Dvil said: NO ONE the lyrics ONLY make sense for what she went through pre-ARTPOP era The lyrics that were added by R Kelly are ... irrelevant to the core message of the song Gaga wrote. well… why it had a feat. in the original version then? was it forced by the label or something? Edited 12 hours ago by nkta Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
River 128,263 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago tbrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrh, I think Mariah fits the best here So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy 1 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 55,051 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago 10 minutes ago, ****oDanceFight said: Thank you for speaking truth to power, sister. The solo version clears any feature, official or imagined. A solo version of the song would make it integral to her ethos as an artist, especially for what followed post-ARTPOP, imo. Disagree, tbh. I think the tension of the song actually needs the pull between the predator and the victim (audience/media + artist). We have forgotten our public MANNERS 6 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkta 706 Posted 12 hours ago Author Share Posted 12 hours ago 1 minute ago, Horny Chicken said: I came here to say Michael Jackson too. that would’ve been so iconic… but he had been dead for three years already by then… Will you take Madonna instead of Michael? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PornoDanceFight 2,260 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Just now, Ladle Ghoulash said: Disagree, tbh. I think the tension of the song actually needs the pull between the predator and the victim (audience/media + artist). See, I feel as a solo track it acts as a vulnerable inverse of Applause; while Applause masks its insecurity through its metaphors ("crashing the critic" and the like) and tone of bravado and braggadocious delivery, I think DWUW (solo) bares her insecurities and offers a bit more introspection to how much her performance affects her both physically and psychologically. The addition of a feature, imo, dilutes the message. Now, that is me talking about the song as is. If another, more theatrical artist or feature was added, I could see how it could be elevated. Also now that I'm thinking about it...Ariana could easily slide on DWUW, all things considered. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas 31,429 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago I hate to say it but R. Kelly's part really elevated the song. Solo would've been too flat, it needed a switch up in the song 7 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.