Lextyr97 20,835 Posted May 13 Share Posted May 13 34 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: I heard he literally balanced it on his c*ck. Humble hung king… I wish he’d just **** the living **** out of me. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 55,282 Posted May 13 Author Share Posted May 13 1 minute ago, Lextyr97 said: I wish he’d just **** the living **** out of me. Zohran after running through all of the dolls on GGD We have forgotten our public MANNERS 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxy 408 Posted May 13 Share Posted May 13 I hate the style of video he used to share this information where they just film him walking around nowhere talking with his hands. Love him, though. And **** yes. His successes demonstrating progressive politics can be successful give AOC a better shot at whatever she does next. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 14,294 Posted May 13 Share Posted May 13 11 hours ago, jimmytimestep said: I ****ing love this guy when will Brandon Johnson Chicago ain't ever going to not be corrupt af unless we elect the IRS itself as mayor Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
27monster27 16,039 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 https://www.instagram.com/p/DYSSbo7kTKw/?igsh=MWdmNnY2ejBvNndseQ== https://www.instagram.com/p/DYVkArVEQOn/?igsh=MWpheG5iZmZ5MjVlbw== Zohran Mamdani has officially gotten the NYC budget deficit down to $0.00. The deficit was initially at ~12 billion dollars. He got it to zero in five months, and without cutting any social services or welfare programs. ---- See how not hard it is to do this? I just know the people who said NYC was "going to learn the hard way for electing him" are FUMING. he/him/his 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 (edited) 6 minutes ago, 27monster27 said: The deficit was initially at -12 billion dollars If the deficit was negative then it means they had a surplus see, i'm very smart Edited May 14 by Jill Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas 31,485 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 How did he do that though? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 31,812 Posted May 14 Share Posted May 14 Just now, Lucas said: How did he do that though? Pure and unadulterated sex appeal, it just vanished Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 55,282 Posted May 14 Author Share Posted May 14 Just now, Lucas said: How did he do that though? It’s balancing the budget, basically. So he cut wasteful spending, reallocated money to social programs etc We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronco 27,590 Posted May 15 Share Posted May 15 1 hour ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: It’s balancing the budget, basically. So he cut wasteful spending, reallocated money to social programs etc And made Taylor Swift pay tax The gays know how to party 2 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 53,079 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 On 5/14/2026 at 7:56 PM, Ladle Ghoulash said: It’s balancing the budget, basically. So he cut wasteful spending, reallocated money to social programs etc I think there was new State assistance too tho. Its not entirely fair to leave that part out 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 55,282 Posted May 20 Author Share Posted May 20 Just now, Economy said: I think there was new State assistance too tho. Its not entirely fair to leave that part out Sure, but negotiating influx of revenue with the governor is a valid means of balancing the budget We have forgotten our public MANNERS 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 53,079 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 1 minute ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Sure, but negotiating influx of revenue with the governor is a valid means of balancing the budget I suppose thats fair... Still tho. In the broader context of debates on style of governance and what some are saying they wish more politicians were like him... then ur still talking a transfer from 1 level of government to another. So a portion of that ($4B if im not mistaken) is not pure savings or new tax revenue. Its reallocation from One level of New Yorkers tax payers government to another level they are still are subject to. If NY or Federal leaders were like him in this context, you could no longer rely on Government level re-allocations on a net basis I still support the general idea of more taxation on the rich as I have made clear many many times so im not against most of his ideals or trying to put him down. But i also like to be fair and point out details that may be missed or not given enough attention 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilia Malinin 3,081 Posted May 20 Share Posted May 20 (edited) On 5/13/2026 at 5:47 AM, Ladle Ghoulash said: Ted Cruz was born in Canada to American parents, which is why he’s eligible. so does this mean that TECHNICALLY i could run in six years because i was born on an american air force base in england to an american mother? Edited May 20 by Ilia Malinin everyone keeps saying "oh, he's back, he's back!" but the truth is i never left! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 55,282 Posted May 20 Author Share Posted May 20 2 minutes ago, Economy said: I suppose thats fair... Still tho. In the broader context of debates on style of governance and what some are saying they wish more politicians were like him... then ur still talking a transfer from 1 level of government to another. So a portion of that ($4B if im not mistaken) is not pure savings or new tax revenue. Its reallocation from One level of New Yorkers tax payers government to another level they are still are subject to. If NY or Federal leaders were like him in this context, you could no longer rely on Government level re-allocations on a net basis I still support the general idea of more taxation on the rich as I have made clear many many times so im not against most of his ideals or trying to put him down. But i also like to be fair and point out details that may be missed or not given enough attention I mean, NYC generates roughly $68B in tax revenue for New York State annually. The city getting 5% of that back to support infrastructure and social programs is neither unreasonable nor inherently unsustainable. And being able to negotiate that as a form of reappropriation of taxes already generated by NYC is probably a solid investment for the state if Mamdani’s policies ultimately help stabilize the city’s finances and expand long-term economic growth and revenue generation. We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.