Ziggy 14,051 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 3 hours ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: I definitely see the cynicism angle, but I honestly feel like, if the angle is to make people think of Redfin, nothing about this promo seems to have anything to do with the brand and seemed to be focused on Gaga’s performance (but I could be eating my words once the finished product is out). I feel like the finished commercial will be a little more geared towards it given how much I’m sure they paid for the Super Bowl ad spot 😂 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 53,565 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) Oh… it’s a big real estate corp that commercial was for… Lame and disappointing. She really acts as if she hasn’t read a single news headline since 1/6th. The only issues we can count on her for are LGBT and anti-racism which is fine but we need to bizarrely stop anticipating her to speak on anything else… despite how illogical that is. Unless that logic really is just brand retention. EDIT: Not that pressed tho. Nurtec was way worse than this and we survived that. Edited January 28 by StarstruckIllusion 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 57,035 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 4 hours ago, elijahfan said: As a fan, I'll happily support her music and live performances. Not sure what point you're trying to make. the point being she's been doing brand sponsorships since day 1 for money but decades into her career, it's now suddenly a problem, so why keep supporting her? mother, what must i do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 57,035 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) I don't understand how this is any different than her flogging overpriced earphones or pointed creative director of a photography company to promote 3 different products (that never happened) what's with the "old gaga is gone"? she was also happily taking checks for product endorsements back then... she's a pop superstar, it's part of the job, this thread is so baffling "Mastercard was ok cus it funded her art" they all fund her art in a way, we just got a new random cover out of this Edited January 28 by nATAH mother, what must i do? 8 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 53,164 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ziggy said: I feel like the finished commercial will be a little more geared towards it given how much I’m sure they paid for the Super Bowl ad spot 😂 Let me have my cope because I’m already cringing thinking about it lmao. I genuinely hope it’s just feel good **** with a dumb logo drop at the end. Edited January 28 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starmie25 22,574 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 22 minutes ago, nATAH said: old gaga is gone" The new one is possibly the happiest and healthiest she's been in, who knows how long. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaveMonster 619 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 She was paid to do a whole ad campaign for Singapore’s tourism in like 2008 or 2009. She has always done ads for random businesses and purposes. 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 57,035 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 45 minutes ago, RaveMonster said: She was paid to do a whole ad campaign for Singapore’s tourism in like 2008 or 2009. She has always done ads for random businesses and purposes. remember the BTW era when she did ads for that German tv channel in her blue bob? like what art was funded through that? mother, what must i do? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
artd0me 841 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 5 minutes ago, nATAH said: remember the BTW era when she did ads for that German tv channel in her blue bob? like what art was funded through that? And especially that channel (RTL II)…. Would call it anything but art 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miky 9,588 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 what this thread feels like Too many people here with moral superiority complex. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helxig 45,366 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 What the f.uck Gaga? How has she become such a capitalist when she was always a socially conscious rebel? I guess money corrupts ANYONE who gets it I'll be myself until they fūcking close the coffin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarah H 4,376 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 18 minutes ago, hELXIG said: What the f.uck Gaga? How has she become such a capitalist when she was always a socially conscious rebel? I guess money corrupts ANYONE who gets it She's always done things like this. https://ladygaga.fandom.com/wiki/Products_and_endorsement Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helxig 45,366 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 34 minutes ago, Sarah H said: She's always done things like this. https://ladygaga.fandom.com/wiki/Products_and_endorsement Girl I've been here from the beginning I know of all that. It's different to promote products, self-promo, and receive funding from big brands, but finance, real estate and business is a different thing to attach your name to. Read the OP. Selling products is one thing but these things carry a lot more moral weight I'll be myself until they fūcking close the coffin. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sneaky Oliver 22,985 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 3 hours ago, nATAH said: remember the BTW era when she did ads for that German tv channel in her blue bob? like what art was funded through that? the thing is that it wasn’t fun to drag Gaga at that time, unless she goes the Maga Minaj route, I don’t really care that much about these ads, we’ll forget about them in a couple of weeks Rememher the Nurtec thing, people were about to unstan but somehow they’re still here so let’s not be hypocrites Popstars can be woke or activists but I don’t think we will ever witness an anti-capitalism popstar, at least not in the same caliber as Gaga Edited January 28 by Sneaky Oliver 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 14,051 Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 12 hours ago, nATAH said: I don't understand how this is any different than her flogging overpriced earphones or pointed creative director of a photography company to promote 3 different products (that never happened) what's with the "old gaga is gone"? she was also happily taking checks for product endorsements back then... she's a pop superstar, it's part of the job, this thread is so baffling "Mastercard was ok cus it funded her art" they all fund her art in a way, we just got a new random cover out of this I will say it’s massively different than the headphones and stuff bc early on she made it a point of these things being part of the brand Gaga. She was very hyper attentive to that. again, though, using Mr Rogers’ song is more the issue for people, I think. It’s saying “the world is a little tricky rn how about a song :)” which feels a little tone deaf for someone who called out the president himself over gays in the military. It’s less the specific company and more that in lieu of anything meaningful (which she doesn’t have to do but has assumed such a title by her own desire), she makes a vague gesture with a song anyone can read anything into for a check from a random company lol to be clear, I’m not bothered atp by her not speaking up bc that’s who I think she is now but for the reasons above I get why some might be 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.