Gaga Is Aligining Her Brand To Finance & Real Estate Business, Thoughts?

[RAMROD 117,063]

As we saw just now, there's a new superbowl ad she is starring in. And it's for redfin & rocket money.

 

Aside from big pharma, (that she is also unfortunately being the face off before), finance and real estate are often viewed critically due to their central role in wealth concentration, economic instability, and the commodification of essential human needs. While they provide critical services, they are frequently perceived as "evil" or unethical because their profits can come at the expense of average individuals, particularly during housing crises or financial collapse.

What is your opinion of this? Are you dissapointed? Or are you gonna turn on the left cheek just like Nurtec?

Do you feel using Mr. Rogers song, (an icon for kindness, especially to children), for it just super ironic because of that, especially in the light of many kids are displaced and without a home from war like Palestine, or ICE violence, that she is very silent of?

Thoughts?

 

[50 Ft Queenie 640]

Thoughts? The thought is a deep void that our queen is silent on ice and a genocide. The reason being her career was built on speaking up and voicing an opinion and making songs about injustice CUE angel down

Her and Michael are a brand now, I had no idea about the real estate news… its all just too much. 

Not much more to say but yeah a void and disappointment. Glenn Close and Meryl aren't afraid to speak up neither are simple people like Katy perry... So that says something. 

She's not thinking about her fans here terrified, the trans community, people on green cards, undocumented. We need her more now than ever! 

Edited January 27 by 50 Ft Queenie

[NUTELLA 26,771]

New GGD banner?

[HotLikeMexico 6,570]

It’s weird… sorry.

[Jill 31,812]

I think she's a multimillionaire, so we shouldn't act surprised when her actions don't exactly align with our own economic class because surprise! her class interests are not the same as ours. She will never truly have our best interests at heart because she simply doesn't live the same life we do, nor does she share our preoccupations or obstacles. This is partly what explains her silence toward current political issues too. That being said, maybe we're reading too much into what amounts to a sponsorship for a cute song

Edited January 27 by Jill

[Ladle Ghoulash 53,066]

1 minute ago, Jill said:

I think she's a multimillionaire, so we shouldn't act surprised when her actions don't exactly align with our own economic class because surprise! her class interests are not the same as ours. She will never truly have our best interests at heart because she simply doesn't live the same life we do, nor does she share our preoccupations or obstacles. This is partly what explains her silence toward current political issues too. That being said, maybe we're reading too much into what amounts to a sponsorship for a cute song

Agreed on all of it, but heavy on the last line. 

Edited January 27 by Ladle Ghoulash

[highwayunic0rn 304]

This site feels like June 2023 Nurtec era all over again  in all seriousness though I think it’s just covering a song for a superbowl ad, tensions are just very high with her silence on political issues again. It wouldn’t surprise me if she says something on Sunday as I think she’ll be aware that the backlash is getting worse, which is annoying cause it could’ve been avoided if she had said something in the first place.

Edited January 27 by highwayunic0rn

[elijahfan 27,484]

Hopefully the check was worth it...

[50 Ft Queenie 640]

6 minutes ago, HotLikeMexico said:

It’s weird… sorry.

weird and embarrassing 

[elijahfan 27,484]

5 minutes ago, Jill said:

That being said, maybe we're reading too much into what amounts to a sponsorship for a cute song

Cute song, not so cute endorsement.

[Jill 31,812]

5 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said:

Agreed on all of it, but heavy on the last line. 

1 minute ago, elijahfan said:

Cute song, not so cute endorsement.

She has had dubious partnerships before. This isn't the first time, nor does it change the reality of who she was prior to this. This specific partnership doesn't mean anything new, that's what I meant. She's engaged to a multimillionaire in finance and business management who has indirect ties to Trump. This particular brand of commercialism is hardly new for her, nor does it mean she only just became this way.

Edited January 27 by Jill

[Psyduck 1,706]

Won't overthink it. All I see is she delivers again with the song.

[nATAH 57,022]

step off her neck and go outside tbh

you're all over the other thread dragging her for this like a lunatic screaming at clouds

[Raivo 201]

It is annoying. I would love for her to be more woke and socialist, but oh well. Get in those millionaire affairs, hope she doesn't find herself in the shallow.

Edited January 27 by Raivo

[RAMROD 117,063]

1 minute ago, nATAH said:

step off her neck and go outside tbh

you're all over the other thread dragging her for this like a lunatic screaming at clouds

 

as I should when I see my own country in shambles, maybe outsider don't understand as much on how dire is this, and that's ok, no judgement to you