27monster27 14,293 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Ziggy said: Like I’m sorry fans may be demo obsessed but that’s not without reason. Mama lays some of her most interesting ideas out in them *cough cough* chromatica *cough *cough* I truly think that the change back to the 2012 verse vocals was due to Lady Gaga leaking the song in August 2013, at least IMO. he/him/his Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 12,250 Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, 27monster27 said: I truly think that the change back to the 2012 verse vocals was due to Lady Gaga leaking the song in August 2013, at least IMO. Oh yeah 1 billion percent. I have high doubts she changed it of her own volition or that the label made her. I mean after btw had plenty of weird vocals, I don’t think those were the issues they’d have had (the song has many other weird elements lol). My theory is she dropped it out of frustration and then to keep it on the album changed the vocal Edited 5 hours ago by Ziggy Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
meltedplastic 519 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago They make edm trance music, it’s not like it’s some artistic experimental genre that only exists in a contemporary art context. They, to their perspective, sold out. They wanted their “life long pension” and then felt guilty for sacrificing their non-existent morals and then criticised Gaga and pop music as a defence. edm music is derivative of disco and house music, which goes hand in hand with pop. Most of the first proto-techno albums were essentially pop albums. I think they have the right to be critical, but their critiques come off ignorant and lack knowledge of music history. pop music will never be low brow! Get with it! Duhhh… also it’s not like Aura was some smash hit that got Gaga millions of dollars lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just A Holy Fool 2,634 Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago They will criticize it, but couldn’t take the cheque quick enough I’m sure. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountainMonster 1,107 Posted 56 minutes ago Share Posted 56 minutes ago First of all… aura being called “too pop” is not something anyone else has ever said. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defmix100 6,506 Posted 14 minutes ago Author Share Posted 14 minutes ago 6 hours ago, Lextyr97 said: Girl bye. The vocals are only SLIGHTLY adjusted from what was actually released. it's not slightly adjusted, they're entirely different verse recordings where her energy is maxed to 1000% Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defmix100 6,506 Posted 6 minutes ago Author Share Posted 6 minutes ago 5 hours ago, Ziggy said: Oh yeah 1 billion percent. I have high doubts she changed it of her own volition or that the label made her. I mean after btw had plenty of weird vocals, I don’t think those were the issues they’d have had (the song has many other weird elements lol). My theory is she dropped it out of frustration and then to keep it on the album changed the vocal If you don't think the label made her change it, which has pretty much been the fan theory, what do you think made her frustrated and leak it? If the label DID make her change it back to the older less maniacal vocals it would make sense for her to feel frustrated and leak it so we at least got the better version. If they didn't make her change, I can't think of why she'd be frustrated Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.