Elon Musk claps back at Billie Eilish

[Morphine Prince 107,499]

Elon Musk and Billie Eilish are officially at war -- at least online -- after the billionaire clapped back at the singer on the heels of her calling him a "f***ing pathetic p***y b**** coward."

Fast-forward to Wednesday night ... Elon took to his own platform, X, to hit back -- reacting to a screenshot of Billie's IG story with, "She’s not the sharpest tool in the shed."

Source: https://www.tmz.com/2025/11/18/elon-musk-claps-back-billie-eilish-sharpest-tool-in-the-shed/

[NUTELLA 13,541]

Only one "tool" involved here & it's not Billie Eilish

[BadKid58 130]

**** that man-child. He's everything Billie said and less.

[Pablo 7,985]

He can shut up

[Lord Mayhem 1,742]

He had all that time and THAT was his comeback...

[Lumiere 5,737]

what a lame weak ass comeback

[River 119,399]

I mean.. you know how much money the music (which Billie is part of), cinema and soccer/football industries could do with all the money that they waste on garbage, all the money they make from the garbage they sell and the money they pay individuals that can actually save a lot of people, from hunger to medicine, and investments on sciences?

It's easy to go after Musk, because he's an evil bitch.

But Billie is also part of the problem and the people who she works for and with.

[PartySick 163,054]

1 minute ago, River said:

But Billie is also part of the problem and the people who she works for and with.

She really, really isn't tbh. She's crazy rich but her wealth is a drop in the ocean compared to Mr. Soon-to-be-Trillionaire. He's about to literally be 20x as wealthy as her and she already has more money than any of us could spend in a hundred lifetimes  

She exists within a broken system, he actively works to break the system further. There's a difference. Mentioning her as "part of the problem" not only plays devil's advocate for this POS, it's like complaining you have a splinter in your pinky toe while your torso is impaled by a telephone pole

She also immediately put her money where her mouth is and donated 20% of her networth to charity after telling the billionaire scum to give their money away.

Meanwhile, Elon sarcastically challenged the UN or EU or whoever to craft a plan to solve world hunger and he'd fund it. They did so and despite the fact that he wouldn't even notice the money being gone, he never acknowledged the solution.

In other words, when we eat the rich, she's so far down on the menu it's not even worth pondering the taste  

OT: F*ck this pig  

[River 119,399]

3 minutes ago, PartySick said:

She really, really isn't tbh. She's crazy rich but her wealth is a drop in the ocean compared to Mr. Soon-to-be-Trillionaire. He's about to literally be 20x as wealthy as her and she already has more money than any of us could spend in a hundred lifetimes  

She exists within a broken system, he actively works to break the system further. There's a difference. Mentioning her as "part of the problem" not only plays devil's advocate for this POS, it's like complaining you have a splinter in your pinky toe while your torso is impaled by a telephone pole

She also immediately put her money where her mouth is and donated 20% of her networth to charity after telling the billionaire scum to give their money away.

Meanwhile, Elon sarcastically challenged the UN or EU or whoever to craft a plan to solve world hunger and he'd fund it. They did so and despite the fact that he wouldn't even notice the money being gone, he never acknowledged the solution.

In other words, when we eat the rich, she's so far down on the menu it's not even worth pondering the taste  

OT: F*ck this pig  

Elon is another big problem, but it doesn't make the others a "no problem"

She has a net worth of $50 million dollars and it's only the beginning of her career, so she's not hungry 

A rich is a rich, belittling it because she's "good" rich, doesn't make it better.

He's evil and all that yes, but sidelining the millionaires is exactly the smokescreen they want right now.

There are too many millionaires right now and now we're starting to see too many billionaires from the entertainment industries, money that is gonna sit in the banks and rot...

They can donate all they want.. they file a tax deduction later and save more money in the bank.

An entertainer shouldn't have more than $10 million net worth...

 

Why Madonna needs $850 millions? 

Why Ronaldo needs $1.4 billions?

Why Tom Cruise needs $600 millions?

 

 

here exactly here, lies the problem.. Imagine what THEY could do with all this money..

[Horny Chicken 9,432]

16 minutes ago, PartySick said:

She's crazy rich but her wealth is a drop in the ocean compared to Mr. Soon-to-be-Trillionaire. He's about to literally be 20x as wealthy as her and she already has more money than any of us could spend in a hundred lifetimes  

 

He’s 10 000x wealthier than she is (assuming her net worth is $100m right now).  
 

Unless I’m missing something? 

Edited 2 hours ago by Horny Chicken

[dollardays 4,063]

6 minutes ago, River said:

Elon is another big problem, but it doesn't make the others a "no problem"

She has a net worth of $50 million dollars and it's only the beginning of her career, so she's not hungry 

A rich is a rich, belittling it because she's "good" rich, doesn't make it better.

He's evil and all that yes, but sidelining the millionaires is exactly the smokescreen they want right now.

There are too many millionaires right now and now we're starting to see too many billionaires from the entertainment industries, money that is gonna sit in the banks and rot...

They can donate all they want.. they file a tax deduction later and save more money in the bank.

An entertainer shouldn't have more than $10 million net worth...

 

Why Madonna needs $850 millions? 

Why Ronaldo needs $1.4 billions?

Why Tom Cruise needs $600 millions?

 

 

here exactly here, lies the problem.. Imagine what THEY could do with all this money..

Structural, systemic issues don't get magically solved just by throwing money at them... It's a much bigger shift that needs to happen

[River 119,399]

7 minutes ago, dollardays said:

Structural, systemic issues don't get magically solved just by throwing money at them... It's a much bigger shift that needs to happen

I know that, but a start is to stop celebrating and defending these rich people just because they are not Elon or Bezos, last elections proved how much all these millionaires are out touch from the rest of the society.

There's no much difference when 1 person owns all this money, than all this money shared between multiple people.. it's still money that could have done so much to the world.. not necessarily to end hungers and stuff.. even just to build a new school, a new university, a new hospital.. things like that.

[elsamars 3,949]

6 minutes ago, River said:

it's still money that could have done so much to the world.. not necessarily to end hungers and stuff.. even just to build a new school, a new university, a new hospital.. things like that.

Then why do you mention Madonna in your previous post who built schools and hospitals in Malawi

[River 119,399]

1 minute ago, elsamars said:

Then why do you mention Madonna in your previous post who built schools and hospitals in Malawi

In 2012 

The 4 classes from 2018 that were announced never been finished.

like she earned back this investment long time ago..

[Ziggy 12,219]

takes one to know one (if we're going to use dumb, played out, tired cliches)