Nicki Minaj (Coke) attacks Bey’s children

[Roughhouse Dandy 11,852]

I was thoroughly entertained with this drama until Nicki started bringing children up and Cardi matched her energy. Not holding it against Cardi bc I get it; if someone takes it there with me then I'm taking it to hell. But gross. Not cute not fun not necessary. Those kids are gonna come across that one day and realize adults were calling them out of their name since they were in diapers. 

Edited 13 hours ago by Roughhouse Dandy

[VTV 12,883]

3 hours ago, Gentleman in Red said:

She’s Azealia Banks 2.0 at this point. 

they wont dare fight each other

[Ladle Ghoulash 26,941]

3 hours ago, Elohim said:

Azealia’s IQ is definitely higher than Nicki’s, thats for sure.

Azealia’s roasts are shakespearian masterpieces next to Nicki’s filthy mouth.

And her music has always been better, too, I fear 

[Hadrian 690]

Wow. And I thought Nicki had so much potential... oh well.

[Ziggy 12,046]

4 hours ago, PEZ said:

Am I having a stroke? Who the hell are Camel and Rat and Desiree? I would have had no idea this tweet was about Bey without being told 

Camel is Jay z Desiree is Desiree Perez of roc nation 

[Ziggy 12,046]

Why are all these pressed weirdos so eager to speak on Jay and beyonces kids. It’s so so weird like you prove why they don’t f with you

[TheARTPOPball 683]

13 minutes ago, Hadrian said:

Wow. And I thought Nicki had so much potential... oh well.

Theres no hope for her until she gets out from underneath that husband of hers

[faysalaaa 4,869]

1 hour ago, Roughhouse Dandy said:

Not holding it against Cardi bc I get it

You get mocking kids? 

[Roughhouse Dandy 11,852]

32 minutes ago, faysalaaa said:

You get mocking kids? 

Like I explained in the next part of that sentence: if someone takes it to a certain level with me then matching that energy is understandable. In small cases like schoolyard bullying (can't blame a kid getting beat up for throwing hands) up to huge matters like 10/7 (oppressed people are going to fight back), I scrutinize the inciting incident before I make a morality call on the reaction.

In the sentence right before that I said the whole concept of bringing the kids into it wasn't entertaining. And in the sentence right after that I said it isn't cute, fun, or necessary. 

What's the problem? What do you want from me?

Edited 11 hours ago by Roughhouse Dandy

[faysalaaa 4,869]

7 minutes ago, Roughhouse Dandy said:

Like I explained in the next part of that sentence: if someone takes it to a certain level with me then matching that energy is understandable. I scrutinize the inciting incident before I make a judgement call on the reaction. 

In the sentence right before that I said the whole concept of bringing the kids into it wasn't entertaining. And in the sentence right after that I said it isn't cute, fun, or necessary. 

What's the problem? What do you want from me?

I dont want anything from you! You made a comment, and I reacted to it, which is what a forum is.

There is no excuse to mock children, even if someone mocks your child. You can go after the adult without abusing a child.

Edited 11 hours ago by faysalaaa

[Roughhouse Dandy 11,852]

Just now, faysalaaa said:

I dont want anything from you! You made a comment, and I reacted to your comment, which is what a forum is.

There is literally no excuse to mock children, even if someone mocks your child. You can go after the adult without abusing a child.

You sure did, but it's helpful in forums to react to one part of the comment within the context of the rest of it. 

In which I explicitly said bringing kids into it wasn't necessary or cute. We agree so I'm not sure the purpose of your response. 

[27monster27 13,677]

Zach Campbell warned us that she was one day gonna go after Bey. I just never thought this soon. 

[faysalaaa 4,869]

4 hours ago, Roughhouse Dandy said:

You sure did, but it's helpful in forums to react to one part of the comment within the context of the rest of it. 

In which I explicitly said bringing kids into it wasn't necessary or cute. We agree so I'm not sure the purpose of your response. 

It doesnt matter that you said it was not necessary to bring kids into it because you would bring kids into it anyway.  You literally said you would still bring kids into it if someone does it to you because you dont mind going to hell if someone mocks your kids.

Edited 7 hours ago by faysalaaa

[salty like sodium 2,010]

5 hours ago, Addison Rae said:

Camel = Jay

Rat = Bey

Desiree = Roc Nation CEO

Onika = Burgers 

but i thought b and her were friends ... they did like 2 songs together ... im so confused

Edited 11 hours ago by salty like sodium

[Rahrahbitchson 20,699]

21 minutes ago, faysalaaa said:

It doesnt matter that you said it was not necessary to bring kids into it because you would bring kids into it anyway. So its invalid to information that you said it was not necessary to bring kids into it if you support it. You literally said you would still bring kids into it if someone does it to you because you dont mind going to hell if someone mocks your kids.

Tbh I think @Roughhouse Dandy was clear in the point they wanted to make, I think you replying to it the way u did was unnecessary and a bit problematic IMO. Like the point of this whole conversation is very unnecessary.

They did said involving kids isn't good so i dont get the point of this

Edited 10 hours ago by Rahrahbitchson