Fans question Doja Cat's signatures

[Teletubby 151,248]

 

[NUTELLA 12,124]

I can understand the appeal of getting a signature from an artist you enjoy in person… but why would you want an item that’s been soullessly scribbled on, conveyor belt-style, by said artist who is likely resenting the process... or at the very least trying to get through it ASAP?

Even if it’s guaranteed that they were the one who signed it themself… where is the charm/value in that?

(Not asking in a judgemental way, I just don't get it)

Edited 6 hours ago by NUTELLA

[TheSine 6,227]

4 minutes ago, NUTELLA said:

I can understand the appeal of getting a signature from an artist you enjoy in person… but why would you want an item that’s been soullessly scribbled on, conveyor belt-style, by said artist who is likely resenting the process... or at the very least trying to get through it ASAP?

Even if it’s guaranteed that they were the one who signed it themself… where is the charm/value in that?

(Not asking in a judgemental way, I just don't get it)

Only think I can think of it that bigger artists are just too busy to sign so they just use automated things to make the process easier. Honestly, I can see why they'd go that route but at the same time you'd want authentic signatures with each one being unique...like you said that's the value in it. Not mad or surprised since plenty of big artists pull this. Only thing I managed to get authentically signed things were from smaller artists.

[GAYHEMikey 8,126]

Oh no I‘m curious how mine looks when I get home 

[HeAteMyh3art 1,533]

Yikes, that's definitely autopen

[Taumaturg0 656]

54 minutes ago, NUTELLA said:

I can understand the appeal of getting a signature from an artist you enjoy in person… but why would you want an item that’s been soullessly scribbled on, conveyor belt-style, by said artist who is likely resenting the process... or at the very least trying to get through it ASAP?

Even if it’s guaranteed that they were the one who signed it themself… where is the charm/value in that?

(Not asking in a judgemental way, I just don't get it)

My thoughts exactly. Is it because they were in contact with the artist ?

Edited 5 hours ago by Taumaturg0

[NUTELLA 12,124]

7 minutes ago, Taumaturg0 said:

My thoughts exactly. Is it because they were in contact with the artist ?

The contact:

[Windowlicker 3,599]

She definitely signed the first batch that went out since she was on live doing it. But I'm always suspicious of any signed items that are restocked after initally selling out.

[spookytanooki 851]

On-topic/off-topic, I got a signed copy of Paris Hilton's newest album last year, and you can literally see that someone else shakily traced the autograph. There are multiple spots where you can see where the marker was lifted and put down again, like someone was just drawing off of a reference 💀

[RAMROD 110,202]

eeek! I hate it when this stuffs are autopen. Especially when they sell it for higher price. Either doing it for real or not at all, ugh!

[Cameltoe Chariot 15,271]

Oh no instead of blindly signing thousands of copies with no real connection to the buyer, she had an auto pen blindly signing thousands of copies with no real connection to the buyer 

[weed 74,467]

Absolutely the whole point of ordering signed merch is that it was TOUCHED physically by your fave. Yes, autopen ruins it! Doesn't matter how brief, they hand wrote the signature. I hate that for her fans.