Jump to content
opinion

Should Gaga have split herself into two?


metalpsi
 Share

Featured Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • TheFrenchGuy

    3

  • Auralegends

    2

  • NUTELLA

    2

  • Controversiaga

    2

Popular Days

RAMROD

Wow, Gaga! Queen of amoeba 

laughing-duck.gif

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ What it meant to be content with you (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
  • LMAO 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

River

Lady? she's not a dog :Cautious:

So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy
  • LMAO 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Starmie25
1 hour ago, PunkTheFunk said:

Then the Lady split in two, the sound created gays like me and you.

:bradley:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

TheFrenchGuy

No, because her point is that she's both at the same time. There's Gaga in Lady, and Lady in Gaga. She is free. 

  • Like 3
  • YAAAS 1
  • Love 1
  • Shook 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Controversiaga

Yes I’m shocked she’s not properly done this as an album concept. Half lady , half Gaga. 

Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga”
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Idefix1999
14 minutes ago, TheFrenchGuy said:

No, because her point is that she's both at the same time. There's Gaga in Lady, and Lady in Gaga. She is free. 

Exactly this! All of the projects like C2C, L4S, Harlequin, ASIB, ... are as much a Lady Gaga album as are BTW or Mayhem. "Lady Gaga" allows her to explore a wide spectrum of styles and asthetics under one name, while separating this would force her to stay in the "Lady" or "Gaga" lane without much moving left or right. Harlequin is the perfect example for this: while the songs are more "Lady", the album cover and the other photos are more "Gaga". As much as she has explored different genres of music and visuals, it all unites under the name of "Lady Gaga". And this is something she is already known  for and will be remembered for

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

TheFrenchGuy
12 minutes ago, Idefix1999 said:

Exactly this! All of the projects like C2C, L4S, Harlequin, ASIB, ... are as much a Lady Gaga album as are BTW or Mayhem. "Lady Gaga" allows her to explore a wide spectrum of styles and asthetics under one name, while separating this would force her to stay in the "Lady" or "Gaga" lane without much moving left or right. Harlequin is the perfect example for this: while the songs are more "Lady", the album cover and the other photos are more "Gaga". As much as she has explored different genres of music and visuals, it all unites under the name of "Lady Gaga". And this is something she is already known  for and will be remembered for

Harlequin is the perfect example. There is sooooo much Gaga in that project and that's exactly why it's my favorite jazz project from her. that album is so underrated

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mister Gaga said:

Yes, with a chainsaw, live at the 2026 grammys right after she wins AOTY

damn this is too funny

  • YAAAS 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hamartia
1 hour ago, SEANGT said:

The entire point of her life's work is about not doing this by the way

Literally :bradley: No shade to OP but like... she's been talking about this for 17 years now lol 

A big chunk of the promo for Mayhem was talking about how she gets frustrated that people still try to ask "which is the real you?" and define her as either a pop artist, or a jazz artist, or an actress. It's the exact same as when interviewers back in the day would ask her if she wore crazy outfits in private, or if her friends called her Gaga or Stefani. 

She is all of it at the same time. There doesn't need to be a distinction. That's the point :abra:

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

elsamars
3 hours ago, Controversiaga said:

Yes I’m shocked she’s not properly done this as an album concept. Half lady , half Gaga. 

Beyonce did it with I Am Sasha Fierce 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yaaaas Gaga

She’d only be 2 foot 7 if she did so I just don’t see that working personally.

  • LMAO 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

TheFrenchGuy
46 minutes ago, Yaaaas Gaga said:

She’d only be 2 foot 7 if she did so I just don’t see that working personally.

great for marketing tho

the world's first Lilliputian pop star

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...