metalpsi 238 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago After ARTPOP, I think gaga should have rebranded as not one but two stars: Lady and Gaga Cheeck to Cheeck should have been Tony Bennet & The Lady, also Joanne. Imagine "xoxo, Lady" and the OG LG5 could have still survived this if she released it under her Gaga persona also this would let her both be authentic/relatable (the lady side) and crazy (gaga side) basically this: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miky 9,519 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago no Too many people here with moral superiority complex. 22 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linus Gaga 8,279 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago I think it has been like that already, but separate them seems kinda cringe. She is a tricon all in one for a reason Hit me a message and say hi ! 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUTELLA 12,180 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Literally, as in two distinct stage names? No. But I do think she more or less split herself in two, moving forward from ARTPOP. I don't consider Joanne, Cheek to Cheek, Love For Sale, A Star Is Born or Harlequin to be "Lady Gaga" albums Those are all Stefani Germanotta side-projects in my mind. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noctelus 2,899 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago (edited) cheeck to cheeck xoxo lady Edited 22 hours ago by Noctelus 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dynamite 60,345 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Insert Michael already does that joke Like a poem said by a neydy in red 15 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auralegends 6,951 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago She does this -> 2 different Enigma shows -> Harlequin as a separate project from LG7 Actually we have a 3rd: Haus Labs Gaga 2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auralegends 6,951 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Just now, dynamite said: Insert Michael already does that joke Wrap that blade of grass like a d**do in my *** 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Gaga 22,958 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Yes, with a chainsaw, live at the 2026 grammys right after she wins AOTY 6 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nite 5,599 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Tbh I feel like a split is way too harsh, like just attempting to squeeze your art into those two separate boxes/labels seems like it would be very limiting as an artist. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 124,557 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago Then the Lady split in two, the sound created gays like me and you. 20 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debithius 5,881 Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago That would be too confusing and too cringe. You can show versatility in different ways and Gaga already does. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
palma 8,241 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago (edited) She already has split herself into two as the pendulum of choice began its dance Edited 21 hours ago by palma Is there some reason my LG7 isn't here? Has she died or something? 7 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jill 30,376 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, NUTELLA said: I don't consider Joanne, Cheek to Cheek, Love For Sale, A Star Is Born or Harlequin to be "Lady Gaga" albums Those are all Stefani Germanotta side-projects in my mind. The voices in your head are not a valid source. Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC). 1 3 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUTELLA 12,180 Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Just now, Jill said: The voices in your head are not a valid source. They said you would say that & that you're lying 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.