Any AI girlie to help with GOE MV?

[Sepsami 18,909]

47 minutes ago, River said:

When Beyonce does that, people defend her at all cost and she's not even using AI 

If rich celebs can steal art and go away with it, then we don't need to feel guilty by doing that as well.

My dead bitch of a grandma used to say: "Don't post your nudes online if u don't want people to flishy flooshy on them"

I don't think Beyoncé types singing and dancing into a machine and that's what makes her sing and dance

Also rip grandma river 

[Sepsami 18,909]

48 minutes ago, ANVEEROY said:

Oh my, you all have a lot of energy - it's GGD. I don't think you can change the opinions of people here. For intellectual discussions, maybe try Reddit.

[Head Empty 25,205]

The worst part about AI is that it's dumbing all of us down.

You want to do something creative related to Garden Of Eden? Draw something. Take an art class. Meet people and discuss your ideas. Make an outfit. Heck, get some friends together and film a music video.

Instead we're taking the biggest mental shortcuts in human history. Just: computer goes BOOP and yaaay I got what I want. Now what? You're not learning. Not building community, not developing character, not honing your own mind.

We're conditioning our brain to think less, to digg less deep and to put in less effort. We're unlearning patience. We're banking on the scraps that big tech companies throw us.

I'm just so f***ing cynical and tired about all of this right now and I don't know how to solve it. I just know how much value REAL art can have in our life, and I feel like there's less and less room for it each day.

[River 117,249]

2 hours ago, Sepsami said:

I don't think Beyoncé types singing and dancing into a machine and that's what makes her sing and dance

Also rip grandma river 

she just watches other people do it and steals it, her brain 

she was a bitch, we hated each other 

[Quentin 6,141]

6 hours ago, CautiousLurker said:

gross

You don't have to be mean

[ANVEEROY 61,241]

3 hours ago, Sepsami said:

*pun intended*

[TrdkMonster 1]

17 hours ago, llemesm said:

 guys why are you taking it so seriously? I will never understand this rejection to AI, he just want to make a nice fan-art video 

How could an ai generated video be fan made? 

[TheFrenchGuy 115]

Bottom line for me is that this is not about stealing, pollution, water usage, or any of the other valid concerns people raise. Those issues are inherent to technology, and whether we like it or not, it is too late to turn back.

What truly bothers me is when I see people dismissing criticism by saying things like, "It's just a new technology" or "People reacted the same way when Google appeared." That frustrates me deeply. Technological advancements can be jarring, yes. But this is not about improving humanity. This is not about making things better. This is about cutting costs and devaluing the work of artists and designers.

This is about business leaders thrilled to pursue their capitalistic ventures while involving as few creatives as possible. It is about ego, money, and greed. "Look I made a video of Gaga and Taylor kissing" ok congratulations, now swipe up and move on to the next trash your algorithm feeds you.

AI is undeniably useful. As a disabled person with autism, LLM are very helpful to me. Generative art brings nothing meaningful to humanity. The only thing it does is give you a confidence boost by letting you create images without the actual skill required. Sure, it lets the daycare across the street create a cute poster for their family event next week. But do we really need that? Who does it really help? Is that truly what we want to prioritize as a society? For me, AI art reinforces the idea that in the 2020's, everything is disposable, including humanity. It has no soul, no intent, no genuine creativity. Just a first draft made from other peoples scraps. It is the millennial gray of Gen Z: lifeless, sanitized, and disposable.

Edited yesterday at 03:44 PM by TheFrenchGuy