Jump to content
other

Katy's new merch looks like unofficial $10 merch from Mexico


Teletubby
 Share

Featured Posts

monstertoronto

I mean the unofficial merch people literally have no legal right to use her name or image and it’s all actually illegal and she could easily sue them to stop. So if she just gets an idea from their illicit activities I would hardly call that the more egregious of the activities. She has the right to sell her own image and name. They do not. 

  • Like 16
  • YAAAS 1
  • Thanks 7
Link to post
Share on other sites

dynamite

Guess they got tired while sticking the gems on :bon:

Screenshot-20250714-010254.png

 

Edited by dynamite
Like a poem said by a neydy in red
  • LMAO 8
  • Shook 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Madame Goo Goo

Okay and the unofficial merch people stole her name and likeness for their own profit? I don’t see a problem here. It’s not even like that design would take more than 15 minutes to make in Canva 

Lady Gaga doesn't owe us anything
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teletubby
Just now, dynamite said:

Guess they got tired while sticking the gems on :bon:

Screenshot-20250714-010254.png

 

they had no legal right to use her name

"You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy
Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

They're stealing from each others :icant:

But stealing ideas are lowest of low btw

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥𝘢, 𝘥𝘪𝘥𝘯'𝘵 (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

dynamite
14 minutes ago, Teletubby said:

they had no legal right to use her name

What?? I'm talking about the fact the second half of the name is all over the place :laughga:

Like a poem said by a neydy in red
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teletubby
3 minutes ago, dynamite said:

What?? I'm talking about the fact the second half of the name is all over the place :laughga:

Katu°erry

"You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy
  • Like 1
  • LMAO 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

REALITY
26 minutes ago, monstertoronto said:

I mean the unofficial merch people literally have no legal right to use her name or image and it’s all actually illegal and she could easily sue them to stop. So if she just gets an idea from their illicit activities I would hardly call that the more egregious of the activities. She has the right to sell her own image and name. They do not. 

Right? The cognitive dissonance to be like "Katy Perry STOLE this UNOFFICIAL merch! It's unacceptable!" is insane

🦠🧙‍♀️🥀📸🎉👻🕺🧟💊💖☎️🔪👤🐺🌱🌎
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Teletubby changed the title to Katy's new merch looks like unofficial $10 merch from Mexico
Economy
27 minutes ago, monstertoronto said:

I mean the unofficial merch people literally have no legal right to use her name or image and it’s all actually illegal and she could easily sue them to stop. So if she just gets an idea from their illicit activities I would hardly call that the more egregious of the activities. She has the right to sell her own image and name. They do not. 

I was thinking the same tbh. Even if she did get the idea from them, those ppl literally used her name first to make money royalty free so I think at worst we call it even tbh :shrug:

 

I get its popular to hate on both Katy Perry and the rich in general (for valid reasons)... but in this particular case, I dont think the merch sellers have much to stand on to complain. They wouldnt have made any money from unofficial merch without using her name in the first place :coffee:

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, monstertoronto said:

I mean the unofficial merch people literally have no legal right to use her name or image and it’s all actually illegal and she could easily sue them to stop. So if she just gets an idea from their illicit activities I would hardly call that the more egregious of the activities. She has the right to sell her own image and name. They do not. 

lol okay Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
  • LMAO 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

monstertoronto
1 hour ago, REALITY said:

Right? The cognitive dissonance to be like "Katy Perry STOLE this UNOFFICIAL merch! It's unacceptable!" is insane

Exactly. People hate Katy so much they want to side with people openly ripping her off. It’s a strange mob hate train mentality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

monstertoronto
1 hour ago, Economy said:

I was thinking the same tbh. Even if she did get the idea from them, those ppl literally used her name first to make money royalty free so I think at worst we call it even tbh :shrug:

 

I get its popular to hate on both Katy Perry and the rich in general (for valid reasons)... but in this particular case, I dont think the merch sellers have much to stand on to complain. They wouldnt have made any money from unofficial merch without using her name in the first place :coffee:

 

It’s such a widespread practice artists never make a move to stop them, even though it probably does cannibalize some of their own official merch sales. I do think it’s ludicrous that these bootleggers would try to take the indignant high ground in this situation.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Teletubby
1 minute ago, monstertoronto said:

Exactly. People hate Katy so much they want to side with people openly ripping her off. It’s a strange mob hate train mentality. 

No one said Katy stole it. It's tweet from fan who just posted it to show that her TEAM is lacking creativity. 

"You b*tch!" ~ Rat Boy
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...