Jump to content
Poster
news

Gaga and Bruno were originally planned to perform “Die With a Smile” at Grammys


Teletubby
 Share

Featured Posts

PartySick
5 hours ago, codymonster said:

You can say what you want about promo, but Gaga ALWAYS backs up what she stands for.

Not always...I'm still incredibly miffed about her silence during the election despite everything she's always stood for being at stake. The decision to stay out of social/political issues was to not draw negative PR for her planned Joker campaign but it was abandoned after the film flopped anyway. So she ditched her morality and activism for no reason :laughga: 

She's got a lot of atoning to do for that in my eyes but this was a good step in the right direction :diane: 

I'm just like 🧍‍♂️
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

The meltdown from little DWASters will never end, I fear

SeXnV.gif

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ 𝐹𝑒𝑒𝓁 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝒶𝓉 𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝓎𝑜𝓊𝓇 𝒻𝑒𝑒𝓉, 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝒻𝓁𝑜𝑜𝓇'𝓈 𝑜𝓃 𝐹𝐼𝑅𝐸!! (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

StrawberryBlond
2 hours ago, tigerteeth said:

😬

 

That’s a lot of feelings for Safe.

 

 

 

 

I don't understand what you're talking about. 

1 hour ago, ALGAYDO said:

Some of her fans truly deserve the absolute worst for wanting her to prioritize her own profit over helping those in need. And it’s not like and of you get a cut of the profits, it’s literally just being selfish for the sake of being selfish. Glad most of us understand than human lives are more important than bragging right or money. 

I know you were directing that at me as you reacted to my earlier post. "Deserve the absolute worst" is a bit dramatic. She can profit and help people, it's not one or the other. People don't need to hear a cover song to donate, you can donate whenever. I've known people who've donated directly to a charity because they didn't like the charity single. Performing another tribute was neither here nor there. Was the entire performance segment scrapped and everyone just performed tribute songs? No, there was a specific tribute and then everyone else sang their hits. It was revealed this was the plan for them too and then plans were changed last minute. Why did it just so happen to the act who had the biggest hit in the US right now? Didn't want them to be even bigger? There are lots of legacy acts that weren't nominated that could've done this instead. Giving it to active artists who were nominated when they had a song of their own to promote wasn't fair. It's nothing to do with selfishness, it's about fair play. The least the Grammys could do is allow them to perform it next year. It's the only way they could make up for the under-handed thing they did. Gaga deserves so much and they keep messing her around for no reason. I don't understand why more people aren't mad about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

codymonster
28 minutes ago, PartySick said:

Not always...I'm still incredibly miffed about her silence during the election despite everything she's always stood for being at stake. The decision to stay out of social/political issues was to not draw negative PR for her planned Joker campaign but it was abandoned after the film flopped anyway. So she ditched her morality and activism for no reason :laughga: 

She's got a lot of atoning to do for that in my eyes but this was a good step in the right direction :diane: 

Didn't she post an endorsement video for Kamala and also perform at one of her final campaign stops?  Did people actually think she would endorse Trump? :icega:

 

 

 

Edited by codymonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick
Just now, codymonster said:

Didn't she post an endorsement video for Kamala and also perform at one of her final campaign stops?  

https://youtu.be/PFhNYOvKy18

At the last minute and the performance was the bare minimum :messga:

She campaigned for both Clinton and Biden and dedicated a substantial amount of her online presence to the issues that were at stake. At this crucial time where a second Trump term was looming, LGBTQ+ rights were at extreme risk, women's rights were at risk, racial minorities' rights and protections were at risk, immigrants' rights and safety were at risk, she opted to stay quiet aside from saying "make sure to vote" in July, posting a tiktok, and performing for two and a half minutes 'cause they didn't want her in the news for anything other than Joker...and I guess they kinda got what they wanted in the end :laughga:

I'm just like 🧍‍♂️
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jill
6 hours ago, chun li said:

Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars were set to perform Die With a Smile with fire shown in the background

thank you grammys!!

sharp1.thumb.gif.d6391b0e6ddb032dcdd623e

Former First Lady of the United States. Now card-carrying member of the Communist Party of China (CPC).
Link to post
Share on other sites

HotLikeMexico
1 hour ago, StrawberryBlond said:

I don't understand what you're talking about. 

I know you were directing that at me as you reacted to my earlier post. "Deserve the absolute worst" is a bit dramatic. She can profit and help people, it's not one or the other. People don't need to hear a cover song to donate, you can donate whenever. I've known people who've donated directly to a charity because they didn't like the charity single. Performing another tribute was neither here nor there. Was the entire performance segment scrapped and everyone just performed tribute songs? No, there was a specific tribute and then everyone else sang their hits. It was revealed this was the plan for them too and then plans were changed last minute. Why did it just so happen to the act who had the biggest hit in the US right now? Didn't want them to be even bigger? There are lots of legacy acts that weren't nominated that could've done this instead. Giving it to active artists who were nominated when they had a song of their own to promote wasn't fair. It's nothing to do with selfishness, it's about fair play. The least the Grammys could do is allow them to perform it next year. It's the only way they could make up for the under-handed thing they did. Gaga deserves so much and they keep messing her around for no reason. I don't understand why more people aren't mad about this.

Sis, you’re doing a whole lot. They didn’t perform it, let it go. It’s not that serious. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Franch Toast

Optics aside, I look at it this way: We might not otherwise have gotten the gem that is Gaga & Bruno performing "California Dreamin'" together. We have performances/video of DWAS, and we might get even more. I'm really happy we have this unexpected "California Dreamin'" performance. 

They did the right thing. :heart:

She/Her/Hers
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

southpaw773
8 hours ago, julz said:

They can still do it at SNL :lolga: or other awards shows

Gaga needs to host and do musical guest with a special guest of Bruno for their duet. What an epic episode that could be. Anybody got Lorne’s phone number?

Like a poem said by a lady in red
Link to post
Share on other sites

SlowLoris

Not to mention the fact that the title "Die with a smile" has a macabre ring to it given the circumstances lmao

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Flippy

Some of y’all… :madge: Chile, anyway, so…

TMBT 3.22.11 // TBTWB 1.17.13 // ArtRAVE 6.3.14 // C2CT 5.28.15 // TJWT 8.13.17 // Chromatica World Tour 9.8.22
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Max

As much as I would have love her/them to sing their own song I really love their rendition of California Dreamin‘ and can’t complain… They did the right thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

MOT
5 hours ago, PartySick said:

Not always...I'm still incredibly miffed about her silence during the election despite everything she's always stood for being at stake. The decision to stay out of social/political issues was to not draw negative PR for her planned Joker campaign but it was abandoned after the film flopped anyway. So she ditched her morality and activism for no reason :laughga: 

She's got a lot of atoning to do for that in my eyes but this was a good step in the right direction :diane: 

Atoning ? She has a duty/responsibility to fight certain battles ? No she doesn't.

And why are you assuming that she was quiet because of JFAD ? It's possible that that was the reason, but I think it's more likely that it was because of Michael, either because he advised/asked her not to, or because she decided against putting his personal safety at risk. Make no mistake, if you speak up publicly against maga you are taking a risk.

That's pure speculation on my part. So is suggesting that it was because of JFAD.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OMonster
12 hours ago, Leoj305 said:

“Albums”

"Albums" as in Mayhem + Bruno's upcoming album. 

subtext / fantasy
Link to post
Share on other sites

DoctorScent

So everybody could sing about *** and color of their panties but when it comes to Gaga she is obligated to be the Mother Theresa?

I mean I love their performance but there will always be some disasters, pandemics, fires etc. and what's the contrast by skipping your love ballad and perform tribute between

Doechii: I mean ****, I like pills, I like drugs
I like gettin' money, I like strippers, I like to **** and

Charli XCX: You wanna turn this **** out, that's what I'm talking about
Pu-pu-put 'em in your mouth, pull 'em all down south
You wanna turn this **** out, that's what I'm talking about (yeah)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...