LG6.5 Themed Countdown on Gaga's Website (24 hours til LG7 announcement)

[DavidLuis198 847]

If all the countdown photos hadn’t leaked (and there wasn't a whole day left on the countdown) this would be such a cool trolling by Gaga

[Ziggy 10,822]

6 hours ago, salty like sodium said:

From Wikipedia:

The Fame Monster is a reissue of American singer Lady Gaga's debut studio album, The Fame (2008). It was released on November 17, 2009, by Interscope Records, Streamline Records, KonLive Distribution, and Cherrytree Records. Initially planned solely as a deluxe edition reissue of The Fame, Interscope later decided to release the eight new songs as a standalone EP in some territories.

Literally says it's a "deluxe reissue" of the Fame and that the bonus songs were then released as an "EP" (NOT an album). Facts are facts but you do you sis. 

I mean it can say that but its length isn’t an EP’s length. Plus I think it is so stylistically apart from tf that it’s unique. Remember, Gaga had been writing what became the Fame for the better part of 3 years before we got it released. TFM was written and recorded over a period of months well after TF was done and released. They’re sooo apart in the internal artist’s process. When she wrote TFM, TF songs were lowkey old af to her

Edited yesterday at 03:46 AM by Ziggy

[ajmsamuel 1,423]

2 hours ago, eifulien said:

I can't believe that we are STILL having these conversations about her albums. Can't you just accept a little contradiction? Is life always perfect? We're talking about Gaga, a super versatile artist, it was bound to get messy with her music projects.

Honestly, is there a way to just force the Wikipedia editors to fix that mess?

Gaga has 10 studio albums and 3 sountrack albums.

Of the 10 studio albums, 2 are duet albums (CTC and LFS), the rest are solo.

The soundtracks are ASIB, TG:M and J:FAD.

Genre-wise, 3 of her studio albums are traditional pop/jazz - CTC, LFS and Harlequin, the remaining are pop/dance-pop/EDM, etc.

Now let's address the contradictions: YES, LG7 is her tenth studio album and it's not a problem because we use the LG-number for her solo projects, she uses them as well. And, well, she can do as she pleases. If she refers to Harlequin as LG6.5, who are we to question it? Just roll with it. The LG-number references more her eras, tours, etc. It's relevant in the fandom only, tbh.

Harlequin is not a soundtrack album, it wasn't used in any movie. There's a soundtrack for JFAD that features Gaga, Harlequin is a studio album she was inspired to record after shooting the film. Period.

TFM IS NOT AN EP, it has 8 songs and it's 34 minutes long, longer than many albums nowadays. EPs usually have up to 4-5 songs. Also, TFM is NOT a deluxe reissue of TF, as much as Interscope promoted it initially as such. TFM is her second album, whose DELUXE edition had her first album, TF, as a bonus disc. That's why when you buy the 2-CD edition, the first disc is TFM, and the second disc is TF, not vice versa.

In a nutshell, F*CK Wikipedia and the fans who keep quoting this mess as if it's the Bible.

Thank you

[Joshie S 5,906]

7 hours ago, DavidLuis198 said:

If all the countdown photos hadn’t leaked (and there wasn't a whole day left on the countdown) this would be such a cool trolling by Gaga

We would have known it was coming anyway, considering there were LG 6.5 billboards in NY & around.

[Bowman 8,104]

I really really hope none of the songs are 2 minutes long. I want 4 minute to 6 minute bangers 

15-17 tracks MOTHER

[salty like sodium 1,083]

16 hours ago, eifulien said:

I can't believe that we are STILL having these conversations about her albums. Can't you just accept a little contradiction? Is life always perfect? We're talking about Gaga, a super versatile artist, it was bound to get messy with her music projects.

Honestly, is there a way to just force the Wikipedia editors to fix that mess?

Gaga has 10 studio albums and 3 sountrack albums.

Of the 10 studio albums, 2 are duet albums (CTC and LFS), the rest are solo.

The soundtracks are ASIB, TG:M and J:FAD.

Genre-wise, 3 of her studio albums are traditional pop/jazz - CTC, LFS and Harlequin, the remaining are pop/dance-pop/EDM, etc.

Now let's address the contradictions: YES, LG7 is her tenth studio album and it's not a problem because we use the LG-number for her solo projects, she uses them as well. And, well, she can do as she pleases. If she refers to Harlequin as LG6.5, who are we to question it? Just roll with it. The LG-number references more her eras, tours, etc. It's relevant in the fandom only, tbh.

Harlequin is not a soundtrack album, it wasn't used in any movie. There's a soundtrack for JFAD that features Gaga, Harlequin is a studio album she was inspired to record after shooting the film. Period.

TFM IS NOT AN EP, it has 8 songs and it's 34 minutes long, longer than many albums nowadays. EPs usually have up to 4-5 songs. Also, TFM is NOT a deluxe reissue of TF, as much as Interscope promoted it initially as such. TFM is her second album, whose DELUXE edition had her first album, TF, as a bonus disc. That's why when you buy the 2-CD edition, the first disc is TFM, and the second disc is TF, not vice versa.

In a nutshell, F*CK Wikipedia and the fans who keep quoting this mess as if it's the Bible.

wow you really take yourself way too seriously, some of you really need to chill.   Gaga doesn't care at all what fans online say about the ordering of her albums so the fact some people act like those who contradict them skinned their cats is a bit much. 

would you prefer people just stopped talking altogether, your royal highness? who are you to gatekeep what people are allowed to talk about or not? smh. it's ironic you're asking people to accept contradiction before going on an entire rant about people providing you with contradiction. but you do you i guess. 

if you really want to change Wikipedia, feel free to edit it. it's open source, anyone can change it. unclear if your changes will be accepted/stick though.

also kind of funny that you're comparing a 15 year old album to 'many albums nowadays' to make a point. TFM didn't come out nowadays though. It came out 15 years ago in a completely different era where what was and wasn't an album and EP was completely different.

Plenty of people have been able to have constructive, interesting discussions on here about this very specific topic and actually made some interesting points, without being total a**h**** about it, some food for thought of things you could try.  Don't think Gaga would be very proud of this type of stanning either as she is all about love and tolerance. 

Edited 10 hours ago by salty like sodium

[eifulien 2,452]

48 minutes ago, salty like sodium said:

wow you really take yourself way too seriously, some of you really need to chill.   Gaga doesn't care at all what fans online say about the ordering of her albums so the fact some people act like those who contradict them skinned their cats is a bit much. 

would you prefer people just stopped talking altogether, your royal highness? who are you to gatekeep what people are allowed to talk about or not? smh. it's ironic you're asking people to accept contradiction before going on an entire rant about people providing you with contradiction. but you do you i guess. 

if you really want to change Wikipedia, feel free to edit it. it's open source, anyone can change it. unclear if your changes will be accepted/stick though.

also kind of funny that you're comparing a 15 year old album to 'many albums nowadays' to make a point. TFM didn't come out nowadays though. It came out 15 years ago in a completely different era where what was and wasn't an album and EP was completely different.

Plenty of people have been able to have constructive, interesting discussions on here about this very specific topic and actually made some interesting points, without being total a**h**** about it, some food for thought of things you could try.  Don't think Gaga would be very proud of this type of stanning either as she is all about love and tolerance. 

I'm left with the impression you took some of these points personally. If I had anything against you in particular or disagreed with you specifically, I would have quoted you. That's not the case cause this has been a recurring topic.

I don't really have anything to add, you can have it your way. Let's choose kindness, as you suggest. 

[salty like sodium 1,083]

All good. I'm not actually that bothered - I have a life beyond what goes on on GagaDaily. This is more fun banter than anything else. But I did want to call you out for basically saying "F*CK" to other fans for disagreeing with you, which felt a bit condescending and also agressive. Appreciate you for reading and agreeing with the kindness approach.  The Kindness punks fight for Chromatica.