Axl Jax 520 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 1 minute ago, stvn said: Because she literally endorsed Trump? What are you saying here? What is it that you know about 5g? Come ON. I already replied to another comment, fair enough I didn't know, but it's just the way everyone it seems on this site seems to associate anyone who steps outside of the box with things that are considered conspiracy theories, automatically makes them right wing or a trump supporter. We don't know much about 5G yet. That's the point. I do believe it's possible that all these frequencies around us could be causing a rise in health problems, but the info isn't out on that one yet so it's just speculation. The human body adjusts of course, but many people who live next to 5G masts report horrible symptoms, especially when they first came out Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gagzus 14,229 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Selling these so her fans can’t download her next album and their ear drums are safe how smart Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stvn 573 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 2 minutes ago, Axl Jax said: I already replied to another comment, fair enough I didn't know, but it's just the way everyone it seems on this site seems to associate anyone who steps outside of the box with things that are considered conspiracy theories, automatically makes them right wing or a trump supporter. We don't know much about 5G yet. That's the point. I do believe it's possible that all these frequencies around us could be causing a rise in health problems, but the info isn't out on that one yet so it's just speculation. The human body adjusts of course, but many people who live next to 5G masts report horrible symptoms, especially when they first came out This would be a relevant point if she wasn’t literally a Trump supporter. im all for stepping outside of the box and questioning everything, don’t get me wrong, I agree. But this situation isn’t that. And not every interpretation of “this is what I think but I have no proof” is equally valid. the most insidious part is that I know people like maya and I think I’m 90% sure she’s a grifter and a troll. And maybe she believes some of it. But something is very, very wrong here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 100,425 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 3 hours ago, faysalaaa said: I wouldnt say shes a grifter, seems like she really believes these crazy things, and I feel shes having mental issues. Also, grifting would mean going to the direction that benefits your career, and none of this benefits her. These people grift to make money, not necessarily benefit their public image/career. Becoming a right wing/conspiracy theory grifter is so easy because making money off dumb people is easy. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stvn 573 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: These people grift to make money, not necessarily benefit their public image/career. Becoming a right wing/conspiracy theory grifter is so easy because making money off dumb people is easy. Exactly. like, does anyone think she’s actually wearing this **** on a daily basis to protect herself from evil 5g? She’s not. She’s just wearing it for the photoshoot. Anyone falling for her shtick needs to reevaluate. Edited September 2 by stvn 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 100,425 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 1 hour ago, Leoooo said: Okay you can bash the price but calling her mentally ill? There is science backed evidence WiFi, RF, Bluetooth & 5G waves cause change in the body (5G penetrates skin by a few centimetres but the body can self regulate the change for the most part) An excerpt from the national medical institute: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9287836/ "the Bio-Initiative group report (33) considered that there was sufficient evidence to warn against hazardous properties of RF radiation for humans for almost all biological endpoints investigated (brain tumours and acoustic neuromas, neurodegenerative diseases, childhood leukaemia, and breast cancer in men and women) even at low, everyday life exposure levels, and that existing public exposure standards are inadequate." Let's not use mental health bulling for someone who wants to make some coin and protect from what is probably going to be a much bigger problem in the coming years.... You didn’t post the conclusion of this specific study: “The only evidence-based biological effects of exposure to RF EMF in the frequency range of 300 kHz – 300 GHz – which includes mobile phones, mobile phone base stations, and Wi-Fi networks – are thermal effects. However, the health risks associated with temperature rise are virtually null with normal Wi-Fi use, and even with the use of a mobile phone next to the head. As for non-thermal effects, scientific evidence is insufficient and inconsistent. Present data do not provide clear evidence of adverse effects in humans. Further research based on much more precise dosimetry procedures and protocols supported by simulations of RF field distribution inside the biological tissue is needed.” 4 3 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stvn 573 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 6 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: You didn’t post the conclusion of this specific study: “The only evidence-based biological effects of exposure to RF EMF in the frequency range of 300 kHz – 300 GHz – which includes mobile phones, mobile phone base stations, and Wi-Fi networks – are thermal effects. However, the health risks associated with temperature rise are virtually null with normal Wi-Fi use, and even with the use of a mobile phone next to the head. As for non-thermal effects, scientific evidence is insufficient and inconsistent. Present data do not provide clear evidence of adverse effects in humans. Further research based on much more precise dosimetry procedures and protocols supported by simulations of RF field distribution inside the biological tissue is needed.” THANK YOU! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HelloHangoverz 13,376 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 19 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: You didn’t post the conclusion of this specific study: “The only evidence-based biological effects of exposure to RF EMF in the frequency range of 300 kHz – 300 GHz – which includes mobile phones, mobile phone base stations, and Wi-Fi networks – are thermal effects. However, the health risks associated with temperature rise are virtually null with normal Wi-Fi use, and even with the use of a mobile phone next to the head. As for non-thermal effects, scientific evidence is insufficient and inconsistent. Present data do not provide clear evidence of adverse effects in humans. Further research based on much more precise dosimetry procedures and protocols supported by simulations of RF field distribution inside the biological tissue is needed.” I read a psychology study once that said some people have a predisposition towards conspiracy theories because it gives them a sense of control over the world that they feel they otherwise lack. So true. There's a whole industry of grifters and politicians out there just capitalizing on people's childhood trauma. So wrong my head is filled with broken mirrors, so many I can't look away 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NATAH 40,135 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 22 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: You didn’t post the conclusion of this specific study: “The only evidence-based biological effects of exposure to RF EMF in the frequency range of 300 kHz – 300 GHz – which includes mobile phones, mobile phone base stations, and Wi-Fi networks – are thermal effects. However, the health risks associated with temperature rise are virtually null with normal Wi-Fi use, and even with the use of a mobile phone next to the head. As for non-thermal effects, scientific evidence is insufficient and inconsistent. Present data do not provide clear evidence of adverse effects in humans. Further research based on much more precise dosimetry procedures and protocols supported by simulations of RF field distribution inside the biological tissue is needed.” thank you! mother, what must i do? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucas 22,870 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 I mean, isn't it scientifically proven that waves etc... are bad for our health? I've heard that since I was a kid Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faysalaaa 2,769 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 49 minutes ago, Morphine Prince said: These people grift to make money, not necessarily benefit their public image/career. Becoming a right wing/conspiracy theory grifter is so easy because making money off dumb people is easy. Hmm I dont know if M.I.A. is in that category of person.? She never cared about money or changing for public acceptance, and she could easily make more money touring. It makes sense she would end up being a conspiracy theorist, considering all her music is against government and internet spying. She had a good message, but some people end up going crazy. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustJustan 372 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 Congrats to MIA on discovering a Farraday Cage. Does she realize that if her phone is under the poncho, it still radiates wifi and 5g signals toward her body under the poncho? Lmfao. Idiotic. 3 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morphine Prince 100,425 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 46 minutes ago, faysalaaa said: Hmm I dont know if M.I.A. is in that category of person.? She never cared about money or changing for public acceptance, and she could easily make more money touring. It makes sense she would end up being a conspiracy theorist, considering all her music is against government and internet spying. She had a good message, but some people end up going crazy. There’s definitely a pipeline for this train of thought and personality type but you might be giving them too much credit. There’s always a market for this type of thing. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
faysalaaa 2,769 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 (edited) 2 hours ago, Morphine Prince said: There’s definitely a pipeline for this train of thought and personality type but you might be giving them too much credit. There’s always a market for this type of thing. Yeah I just respect her too much as a person and artist, its hard for me to see her as a grifter. Edited September 2 by faysalaaa Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstermilo 3,419 Posted September 2 Share Posted September 2 she needs antipsychotic meds from what it seems. this kinda paranoia is a sign of mental illness Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.