Blade says LG7 “shipped back” to Gaga? (he's joking)

[Jack3257 635]

5 hours ago, Reality said:

I understand that people are upset because he said "February 2024" and nothing happened, but we also have to remember that he got that info in November 2023. A lot could've changed since then and I don't doubt that that was the information he was provided with at the time. Like, let's not start acting like he's just full of sh*t now and knows absolutely nothing when he's provided us info before.

This fanbase has no problem consistently agreeing that Gaga’s team can be a mess, and that plans with her releases change often (not necessarily the fault of Gaga).   With that being said, why do we have a hard time accepting the fact that we get a lot less “reliable” Gaga info because of this.  The “reliable insiders” were probably given information that was correct, but has probably changed every five minutes since.

[Reality 71,851]

4 minutes ago, Jack3257 said:

This fanbase has no problem consistently agreeing that Gaga’s team can be a mess, and that plans with her releases change often (not necessarily the fault of Gaga).   With that being said, why do we have a hard time accepting the fact that we get a lot less “reliable” Gaga info because of this.  The “reliable insiders” were probably given information that was correct, but has probably changed every five minutes since.

I don't understand what you're trying to say. I said that the "reliable" insiders were probably given info that was once correct, but obviously plans can change; Blade said he was given that info in November.

And we don't have a hard time "accepting the fact that we get a lot less 'reliable' Gaga info because of this". The fact that plans could be constantly shifting is the reason why insiders get stuff wrong. They're told the info at a very specific point in time, which isn't necessarily true months down the road.

[mdance4life 606]

This thread is so chaotic. My IBS is flaring up. I love it.

[Starmie25 13,075]

Think she's reading this forum 

[27monster27 11,105]

7 hours ago, Schizophonic said:

So that means, they are not happy…. Same happened with ARTPOP 

How so?

[Tyler1992 2,119]

9 hours ago, Schizophonic said:

So that means, they are not happy…. Same happened with ARTPOP

I don’t think Interscope was upset about ARTPOP as some want to believe. It still was a successful album, not by Gaga standards, but by the general standard of the newfound streaming era. 

Is there evidence that Interscope wasn’t happy with ARTPOP? I know Gaga and Troy Carter had creative differences, but he himself said “she handles 95% of the creative side, and [I] 95% of the business side”. It’s clear the [Koons] ball dropped somewhere, and it’s very apparent Gaga held her side of the deal. 

After ARTPOP, Gaga released Cheek to Cheek, and Joanne, not the trajectory of someone pigeonholed by their label.

She also re-signed with the label and has always said it’s been a good working relationship. 

Gaga works on her albums up until the deadline of when it needs turned in, after that, she’s hands off. 

[PMM 2,972]

[HermioneT 1,985]

8 hours ago, KindnessPunk said:

The album is set in the year 1999 and Gaga wanted it to be as authentic as possible

A Spice Girls inspired album the Ice Spice collab rumour makes so much more sense now

[LateToCult 39,634]

The way I can’t tell if he’s joking or not because Gagita do be sending them whatever she feels like. 

[Actual Patient 101]

...where's my nurtec? I ****ing need it now 

I hope it's not true   otherwise it would mean the album is coming next year

Edited March 13 by Actual Patient

[B2theRich33 2,239]

4 hours ago, Tyler1992 said:

I don’t think Interscope was upset about ARTPOP as some want to believe. It still was a successful album, not by Gaga standards, but by the general standard of the newfound streaming era. 

Is there evidence that Interscope wasn’t happy with ARTPOP? I know Gaga and Troy Carter had creative differences, but he himself said “she handles 95% of the creative side, and [I] 95% of the business side”. It’s clear the [Koons] ball dropped somewhere, and it’s very apparent Gaga held her side of the deal. 

After ARTPOP, Gaga released Cheek to Cheek, and Joanne, not the trajectory of someone pigeonholed by their label.

She also re-signed with the label and has always said it’s been a good working relationship. 

Gaga works on her albums up until the deadline of when it needs turned in, after that, she’s hands off. 

if my Gaga memory serves correctly. she explicitly stated in late september / early october 2013 that she had to rework a lot of the album due to the label not liking the instrumental which is why the itunes festival songs and album have different versions.

[Sneaky Oliver 21,240]

I don’t think the label would refuse to release any Gaga related stuff at this point of her career, she has stated she has full control over her music before so I’m not concerned about that 

[BloodyM 1,180]

1 hour ago, B2theRich33 said:

if my Gaga memory serves correctly. she explicitly stated in late september / early october 2013 that she had to rework a lot of the album due to the label not liking the instrumental which is why the itunes festival songs and album have different versions.

I remember this too! ARTPOP was meant to have a more 'ravey' sound

[MessyTop 14,304]

15 minutes ago, Sneaky Oliver said:

I don’t think the label would refuse to release any Gaga related stuff at this point of her career, she has stated she has full control over her music before so I’m not concerned about that 

correct. They can release whatever, but they can choose not to support it or give it a budget for marketing and videos. So yeah, they do care. 

[Lextyr97 18,927]

Can the tag please be switch to “funny” so everyone entering this thread knows it’s a joke. Jesus Christ @River please 🙏🏽