Jump to content
other

La Toya insists no one can top Michael Jackson


Teletubby

Featured Posts

Teletubby

La Toya Jackson has broken her silence on Harry Styles being labelled the 'new King of Pop' on the cover of Rolling Stone UK last year. 

La Toya is the older sister of the legendary Michael Jackson who is widely considered the original King of Pop, with his estate trademarking the title. 

Speaking with KIIS FM's  she insisted no one 'can ever top' her brother and take the crown. 

'You know, [Harry is] a great entertainer. He's wonderful. I truly believe that,' she said. 

'I'm not being biased, but I think that my brother is the greatest of all time and he always will be.' 

She continued: 'He was incredible and I don't think anyone can ever top him. I would love to meet the person that could do that.'

Nevertheless, La Toya insisted she does 'love' Harry and believes he's a great performer in his own right. 
source

i love 🐀
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply
StarstruckIllusion

Like not even just stardom. The talent he had… like what boundaries are there even left to break?

Our faves can still be legends without surpassing him like it’s fine

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anderson123

I mean she's right but Rolling Stone magazine were just trying to stir the pot and they did it. Look at this months later still being talked about. They were thristy for attention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ChicaSkas

She's right.

 

Not Gaga, not Taylor, not Harry. MJ is the king of Pop. Only Taylor right now is under him sales wise. 

Do YOU own the 4' by 6' Perfect Illusion promo Poster? Will pay you for it. Pic: http://i.imgur.com/UWuzumk
Link to post
Share on other sites

Controversiaga

Idk, I could see him being vers tho 

Pronounced like “Balenciaga” . Emphasis on the “Ga”
Link to post
Share on other sites

dimitristhe

To Harry Styles, Drake etc. top this first you bitches! :ohwell:

 

When we're not together tell me everything's gonna be alright
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy

I agree if u mean in a figure of speech to emphasize how big and talented he was...

 

But if u mean it literally imma say no. Its been less than 100 years since modern televised tech has allowed for modern stardome where visuals matter etc...

 

Say this form of entertainment/performance or anything that resembles it lasts another 200 years... why would you assume the biggest star in the first 1/3 of time frame cant be topped? You just never know

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...