Kesha Lying Under Oath Explained

[Economy 49,570]

10 hours ago, Helxig said:

If they don't hurry up and settle this in court before AI advances any further they will soon be able to create fake voice messages from her using a database of her talking in interviews and nothing will be provable 

AI voice literally scares me for this reason. Recordings will either potentially get innocent people convicted, or if courts recognize it's dangers, make it impossible for people who are victims to use recording as proof

 

Basically one important tool in courts will be made unreliable and justice will be even more difficult to do properly

[RahrahWitch 6,985]

The whole case is a complete mess even with some of the New York court decisions. I feel so bad for Kesha having to relive her trauma over and over for almost 2 decades now, Whatever happens during the trial I hope she can finally move forward and be free of him.

[CheapGin 561]

9 hours ago, Economy said:

Woa. What do we know about this? I did not know this

It was something that came out in the deposition from 2017, this Hollywood Reporter Article mentions it:

"Lady Gaga testified that Interscope Records CEO John Janick told her he heard a rumor Gottwald raped Perry. In his own deposition, Janick denies having said such a thing."

It's mentioned in this Radar Online Article too:

"In an unsealed 2017 deposition as part of Dr. Luke's defamation case against Kesha, the Oscar nominee — legally known as Stefani Germanotta — claimed Interscope CEO John Janick made the accusation as part of a conversation about bringing Kesha over to the music label.

"He said, 'So you know that Dr. Luke raped Katy Perry, too?'" Gaga recalled in court, adding that Kesha was also present for the discussion.

An attorney went on to say Janick testified under oath that he never said that.

"It doesn't surprise me," Gaga answered."

[hELXIG 42,954]

9 hours ago, Economy said:

AI voice literally scares me for this reason. Recordings will either potentially get innocent people convicted, or if courts recognize it's dangers, make it impossible for people who are victims to use recording as proof

 

Basically one important tool in courts will be made unreliable and justice will be even more difficult to do properly

Exactly. And that's only one small repercussion. We're developing this technology much too soon. We are not ready for it. Think about how phone scammers will be able to use people's family members voices to scam them out of money. How this could affect political decisions based on artificial voice recordings and phone messages. How the future of musical artists could be that they just lay down their vocals once and then AI creates their songs from thereon out (similar to vocaloids). How voice actors (an already struggling and underpaid profession) would be out of jobs. They'd just pay for the rights to use their voices and AI would do the rest. Marvel already cuts corners and saves tonnes of money using cgi artists paid slave wages to create their entire sets and even costumes! Putting costume designers out of work also. Think how much money these greedy companies could save using a computer to generate audio. And this is only a few options that my tiny little brain could come up with. And we are only at the very beginning of this technology rolling out. In 5 years it will be absolutely everywhere. The world as we know it is about to shift drastically