Little Monsters #5 Female Social Media Following

[Caothan Mcbride 1,340]

 

[Caothan Mcbride 1,340]

Not Swifties being double what we are lol least we made the top 5 

[weed 74,095]

barbz?? 

[Guest]

Idk why it annoys me seeing Nicki above Gaga like that. Ew.

[monstrosity 3,943]

Selena has 388M in insta alone so….. it’s not accurate 

[COOOK 76,406]

12 hours ago, Caothan Mcbride said:

Not Swifties being double what we are lol at least we are good people

FixedT 

[monstrosity 3,943]

12 minutes ago, monstrosity said:

Selena has 388M in insta alone so….. it’s not accurate 

+ 50M in tiktok + 66M in twitter (=500 without Facebook) so she clears

And Katy has 108 on twitter and 192 on insta alone 

And jlo has 236 on insta alone

And Miley has 197 on insta and 46 on Twitter alone

and Ariana has 358 on insta alone

so it’s like really inaccurate and Gaga isn’t even in the top 10 or I missed something

[RenegAde 19,431]

So is this purely based on social media followers because in terms of impact, no one is touching beyhive and little monsters. 

[Zombiecat 16,874]

How are they defining who of their followings are part of the fandom? 

[Monstermilo 4,645]

this list is inaccurate 

ariana has 358 on instagram

43 million on facebook 

30 million on tik 

and before she deactivated her twitter she had 80 million followers. 

she would have been number one if she still had twitter active but even without it, she would be number two so this list is all sorts of messed up

[rinasawachanta 3,094]

Well, now removing purchased followers.

[rinasawachanta 3,094]

I propose a playful activity. Enter Beyoncé's instagram, click on her followers and see how many are bought (strange name, no photo, suspicious or empty feed). Of the first ten that appear, NINE are bought (in fact, four of them have the tag "new", meaning they just "created the account"). That means that only 10% of Beyoncé's followers are real lmao, which would give us a total of 28 million (at most). This is also done by others, such as Katy Perry. Gaga, on the other hand, does not.

[Chlorine 47,976]

4 minutes ago, rinasawachanta said:

I propose a playful activity. Enter Beyoncé's instagram, click on her followers and see how many are bought (strange name, no photo, suspicious or empty feed). Of the first ten that appear, NINE are bought (in fact, four of them have the tag "new", meaning they just "created the account"). That means that only 10% of Beyoncé's followers are real lmao, which would give us a total of 28 million (at most). This is also done by others, such as Katy Perry. Gaga, on the other hand, does not.

[Lextyr97 20,010]

17 minutes ago, rinasawachanta said:

I propose a playful activity. Enter Beyoncé's instagram, click on her followers and see how many are bought (strange name, no photo, suspicious or empty feed). Of the first ten that appear, NINE are bought (in fact, four of them have the tag "new", meaning they just "created the account"). That means that only 10% of Beyoncé's followers are real lmao, which would give us a total of 28 million (at most). This is also done by others, such as Katy Perry. Gaga, on the other hand, does not.

I don’t know how accurate the numbers are 😂 but this is something people can pay for on social media. My fiancé had it offered to him for his business. It’s a thing

[monstertoronto 10,240]

Nicki has 100 M more than Gaga. Shook.