nATAH 57,035 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 2 hours ago, ScreamQueen007 said: You think that’s why they’re doing this? Don’t be naive. i'm not talking about the thread topic, just responding to the user saying p*rn isn't harmful to minors mother, what must i do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nATAH 57,035 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Economy said: There's been connections made to men for example not getting as excited anymore with real connections and contributing to erectile dysfunction even tho there's no biological issue with them because the brain gets accustomed and wired to be turned on by what they frequently view (that's a theory not proven but it is highly by some brain scientists hypothesized) i've tested this on myself and it's very true to me! i stopped watching any p*rnography for months and noticed a clear difference in what arouses me p*rn that i considered super boring/generic actually became very appealing after those few months lord knows what damage that would do to a developing brain mother, what must i do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 52,861 Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 1 hour ago, Charmz said: It’s the invasion of privacy and the keeping of records for me. I understand the argument about children, but historically that’s been left up to parents to monitor and enforce their child’s internet usage. Why does the government now have to be involved? I used to peak at my dad’s dirty magazines and VHS tapes. They will find a way, and Louisiana knows this. It’s very very suspicious and giving 1984/Big Brother vibes. I feel bad for adults who just want to masterbate to legally produced ****ography who are now going to have to identify themselves each time. It’s a shame/scare tactic. What if a married straight man enjoys gay ****? It’s now on file and part of a record. How can this information be used? Can people request this information? It really isn’t about children. It’s about control. But by that argument there's no point in having age restrictions for anything cuz it's "up to the parent". U end up not protecting kids from anything on the assumption parents will. Also parents can't really monitor kids at all times But I do get what ur saying about invasion of privacy tho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.