Taylor terrified of privacy breach after details of her travel schedule revealed

[AsleepOnTheCeiling 6,420]

7 minutes ago, PartySick said:

They're tracking planes though? Aren't most flights public knowledge? It's not like someone snuck an air tag into her purse or something

 

7 minutes ago, misha4ever said:

Isn't that information public anyway?

I believe she wants her private jet hidden from those databases. 

[PartySick 161,078]

3 minutes ago, TortureMeOnReplay said:

I believe she wants her private jet hidden from those databases. 

Well too bad

God forbid she faces a bit of bad PR for doing something wrong

[insight 2,440]

She has the money to hire enough bodyguards

[Chromatography 10,186]

57 minutes ago, TortureMeOnReplay said:

Pleaseeee. Taylor never steps foot in the airports. She's driven to the steps of her private jet. What's the safety issue? Because she or her publicist call the paparazzi all the time to photograph her and her men at the beach. She posts pictures in her homes that she's given tours of on social media, a much more intimate setting with a more precise location. This isn't about general privacy. It's the fact that she's been dragged for her private jet usage all year. That's it. 

let’s see the excuses for this one

[nATAH 50,062]

27 minutes ago, CaliforniaDreamin said:

I don’t know why everyone’s canceling her so hard. We drive cars and pollute and etc… she’s famous she has stuff to do.  Tours to do and etc..

because she topped the list of polluters

[Eido 3,676]

The way she is trying to change the narrative 

[Ceres 3,249]

Tay tay is playing 4D chess, shes stirring the pot so we can take a dump on her actions and call her anti-eco queen, and then she gets enough sad material for a new album. 

[RahrahWitch 6,985]

definitely about privacy not about how much she's polluting 

[rinasawachanta 3,093]

Oh, how sad. Sadder is to think of the present and the (non) future of especially those deprived communities that are the main victims of climate pollution, as well as the flora and fauna affected by the continuous CO2 emissions and their devastating effects on the environment.

[rinasawachanta 3,093]

5 hours ago, ProfessionalClown said:

Do you guys not realize she literally had had multiple stalkers, one even who broke into her house twice and said if he was let go he would do it again. Not to mention she’s one of the biggest stars rn. No empathy here tbh

Omg, empathy?!?!?!?!!! Why should I have empathy for a billionaire who with her capricious and ultra-privileged decisions is literally ruining the planet and the well-being of populations, animals and vegetation? Please explain it to me because I don't understand. Or I do understand, and it's just another case of identification of the harmed to those privileged who harm them.

[Ashley 9,539]

Is her concern being followed from the airport?  Because she wouldn’t be using the same exits the public use, and would be in an unmarked car with security. I don’t see how this would be unsafe for her.

[Concertaholic 5,960]

8 hours ago, LM said:

Well, dont use private jets then

I’m sure someone else has already said this on later pages but can you honestly imagine someone as big as Taylor or Gaga having to fly commercial? It would be a frenzy and quite frankly a safety issue.

[RudraCNG 15,173]

21 minutes ago, Concertaholic said:

I’m sure someone else has already said this on later pages but can you honestly imagine someone as big as Taylor or Gaga having to fly commercial? It would be a frenzy and quite frankly a safety issue.

This year she traveled almost 200 times before midnights, with no tours or anything to promote and is the most pollutant star in the US. She's been travelling like crazy in her private jet only for pleasure and doesn't want that bad PR now that she's pretending to be political, so she opted to make a privacy issue out of it. I'm sure no one would make a drama out of this if she reduced her private jet flights to those necessary for work and took her crew with her, but obviously that's not the case 

[LM 4,067]

24 minutes ago, Concertaholic said:

I’m sure someone else has already said this on later pages but can you honestly imagine someone as big as Taylor or Gaga having to fly commercial? It would be a frenzy and quite frankly a safety issue.

Yes I can, just google Lady Gaga lax airport and you'll see countless pics of Gaga flying commercial. Also, the point is not in eliminating private jets flights, Taylor just should make some steps to reduce them and not use her jet almost every day. 

[ProfessionalClown 10,647]

6 hours ago, River said:

Airport is not a house, the airports around the world, especially in the US post 9/11, are well secured for that to happen, this is just a smokescreen to look for empathy and cover up the amount of pollution that she and her fellow rich celebrities are causing.

“Airport is not a house” knowing where her location is is still dangerous bruh