[misleading] FDA wants to wait until 2096 to release data about vaccines

[BUtterfield 8 41,819]

 

[TimisaMonster 31,073]

Ok...now see...THIS is reason to be suspicious of these vaccines...like...

[GAGASLAYME 2,415]

oh f*ck🤠

[GAGASLAYME 2,415]

Moderna would never

[Chlorine 47,976]

Any other source besides the Epoch Times which is far right and pro tr*mp 

[Naak Le Vaar 1,222]

Playing devils advocate, I'm assuming they don't want to release the info so companies can profit from keeping the patent/not revealing how the vaccine works. Bc the virus is the new flu vaccinea will be in demand for a while. This is my assumption i didnt bother to read the article oops

[PartySick 172,988]

4 minutes ago, TimisaMonster said:

Ok...now see...THIS is reason to be suspicious of these vaccines...like...

It's not

3.3 billion people are vaccinated at this point. If anyone still doubts the efficacy and safety of these vaccines, they're a moron.

[PartySick 172,988]

1 minute ago, Naak Le Vaar said:

Playing devils advocate, I'm assuming they don't want to release the info so companies can profit from keeping the patent/not revealing how the vaccine works. Bc the virus is the new flu vaccinea will be in demand for a while. This is my assumption i didnt bother to read the article oops

It's a right wing site anyway, their op ed is useless tbh.

[Roughhouse Dandy 13,705]

If this is true, that's definitely not chill and will probably get challenged

BUT 

Be very careful about this source; they're directly attached to and funded by evil people and have a habit of stretching the truth to the point of fantasy in order to radicalize citizens. 

[Dojo 19,823]

got thing i had AstraZeneca 

[Chlorine 47,976]

https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/11/19/fda-2076-vaccine-data/

[Guest]

and why? what do they have to hide?

[PartySick 172,988]

4 minutes ago, AnnaNicoleSmith said:

and why? what do they have to hide?

Nothing:

 

8 minutes ago, Frank Potion said:

https://www.snopes.com/news/2021/11/19/fda-2076-vaccine-data/

And this is why you don't get your information from headlines and soundbites @anti-vaxxers

[HEARTSTOP 3,154]

Guys, if you need 75 years to see the negative effects of the vaccine, then you can pretty much say there are no negative effects of the vaccine.

No one above 75 years old can say they have a problem due to a vaccine they took almost a century ago.

We (humanity as we know it) won't be around by then anyway.

[Economy 52,907]

1 hour ago, PartySick said:

It's not

3.3 billion people are vaccinated at this point. If anyone still doubts the efficacy and safety of these vaccines, they're a moron.

Im not saying i dont trust them (i was double vaxxed pretty early on)

 

But i wouldnt call them a moron because of 1 year...

 

How often were long term effects linked to something medical (that experts insisted was safe) only many years after it came out?

 

I dont like misinformation or some of the nonsense going around but having reservations doesnt make u a moron. I myself still have lowkey what if thoughts

 

And i have good reason to. I myself experienced permanent damage from a medication i was told was safe at the time. Medical stuff always carries some degree of risk and we dont always know everything till many years later