Jump to content
science

New discovery proves Ancient unknown migration to Europe


FfFfFfFF

Featured Posts

FfFfFfFF

pestera-Bacho-Kiro-homo-sapiens_profimed

Genetic sequencing dating back 45,000 years shows intermixing with Neanderthals more common than previously thought.

Genetic sequencing of human remains dating back 45,000 years has revealed a previously unknown migration into Europe and showed intermixing with Neanderthals in that period was more common than previously thought.

The research is based on analysis of several ancient human remains – including a whole tooth and bone fragments – found in a cave in Bulgaria last year.

4211.jpg?width=700&quality=85&auto=formamolar-adn-homo-sapiens-bulgaria_MPI-EVA-

“This indicates that they belonged to a modern human migration into Europe that was not previously known from the genetic record,” the research, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, said.

It also “provides evidence that there was at least some continuity between the earliest modern humans in Europe and later people in Eurasia”, the study added.

pestera-Bacho-Kiro-homo-sapiens_profimedpestera-Bacho-Kiro_profimedia-0519030227

Source - https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/apr/07/ancient-human-migration-europe-neanderthals-genetic-sequencing

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, badfaith said:

Vampires??

the pointy part is the root of the tooth

Генерал Марина Абрамовић
Link to post
Share on other sites

beautiful tooth, interesting how teeth got worse with our evolution (as in, so many ancient skulls don't need braces or anything)

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

OMG same shapes of teeth as with modern ones :billie:

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

FfFfFfFF
44 minutes ago, KanyeWest said:

but needantarls were ugly!!!! pls dont tell me i have some needantarls in me 

Aren't you from northern Africa? You certainly do, but probably less than full-on native Europeans..

Link to post
Share on other sites

FfFfFfFF
4 hours ago, weed said:

beautiful tooth, interesting how teeth got worse with our evolution (as in, so many ancient skulls don't need braces or anything)

It's a well-known fact that prehistoric people had exceptionally great teeth due to their diet. After the hunter-gatherers settled down and agriculture became a thing, people started to eat lots of carbohydrates and stuff went downhill. :bradley:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FfFfFfFF

@KanyeWest

This article includes data from Morroco
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474783/

We ran ADMIXTURE for k equal 2 to 7 and obtained CV errors, and determined that the best k (the one with lowest cross-validation error) is k = 4. Results (Figure 1) are coincident with those previously published [17] and show that North Morocco, Libya and Egypt carry high proportions of European and Near Eastern ancestral components, whereas Tunisian Berbers and Saharawi are those populations with highest autochthonous North African component.

In the PCA analysis (Figure 2) Eurasian populations are the closest to Neandertals among modern humans, which is in agreement with previous studies [1]. Sub-Saharan Africans are, as expected, more distant to Neandertal, whereas North African individuals are placed between these two groups. North African individuals with the highest Sub-Saharan African component (as detected by ADMIXTURE) are distant from Neandertal and closer to Sub-Saharan populations. It is interesting to notice that the North African populations closer to Neandertals are populations with a large known European or Near Eastern admixture, but also the Tunisians that have an almost complete autochthonous North African genetic component.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HardlyaSaint
9 hours ago, KanyeWest said:

but needantarls were ugly!!!! pls dont tell me i have some needantarls in me 

:saladga:they were cute a subspecies— for their time. I’m sure in 500 thousand years if our species even still exists or evolves — they’ll be calling us ugly too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HardlyaSaint said:

:saladga:they were cute a subspecies— for their time. I’m sure in 500 thousand years if our species even still exists or evolves — they’ll be calling us ugly too. 

Impossible not when Matt Bomer exists

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FfFfFfFF said:

@KanyeWest

This article includes data from Morroco
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3474783/

We ran ADMIXTURE for k equal 2 to 7 and obtained CV errors, and determined that the best k (the one with lowest cross-validation error) is k = 4. Results (Figure 1) are coincident with those previously published [17] and show that North Morocco, Libya and Egypt carry high proportions of European and Near Eastern ancestral components, whereas Tunisian Berbers and Saharawi are those populations with highest autochthonous North African component.

In the PCA analysis (Figure 2) Eurasian populations are the closest to Neandertals among modern humans, which is in agreement with previous studies [1]. Sub-Saharan Africans are, as expected, more distant to Neandertal, whereas North African individuals are placed between these two groups. North African individuals with the highest Sub-Saharan African component (as detected by ADMIXTURE) are distant from Neandertal and closer to Sub-Saharan populations. It is interesting to notice that the North African populations closer to Neandertals are populations with a large known European or Near Eastern admixture, but also the Tunisians that have an almost complete autochthonous North African genetic component.

Im from South morocco and I'm berber, so this is interesting thank u

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...