Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
science

World's largest iceberg breaks off from Antarctica


Aphasic

Featured Posts

Focus

off to sink djw's ship with all the act 2 files in the laptop

8cb5209a425f55d81293db8ad88e109f.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
Just now, April 25 said:

off to sink djw's ship with all the act 2 files in the laptop

8cb5209a425f55d81293db8ad88e109f.jpg

He better be ready to save those files :trollga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Grim

Human race had a good run:applause: I don't know about you but destroying whole planet's climate is pretty big achievement:flutter:

I'm probably wrong
Link to post
Share on other sites

CautiousLurker

Iceberg be like 


tenor.gif?itemid=3975228
 

Spoiler

Also iceberg

8e9fa2b1193c7011615df049e556df17.gif

(Sorry :huntyga:)

It's a joke! When you give me that look, it's a joke!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
4 minutes ago, Grim said:

Human race had a good run:applause: I don't know about you but destroying whole planet's climate is pretty big achievement:flutter:

We're literally little creatures and look at what we have done! Not a meteorite but tiny humans are ending the world this time around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
7 minutes ago, Grim said:

Human race had a good run:applause: I don't know about you but destroying whole planet's climate is pretty big achievement:flutter:

 

1 minute ago, Aphasic said:

We're literally little creatures and look at what we have done! Not a meteorite but tiny humans are ending the world this time around.

Im starting to think geoengineering with aeorosol particles may be worth the risks of unintended consequences cuz doing nothing is already gonna have huge consequences

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
Just now, Economy said:

 

Im starting to think geoengineering with aeorosol particles may be worth the risks of unintended consequences cuz doing nothing is already gonna have huge consequences

There are a bunch of good ideas to reduce the decay of our world but governments won't allow them because they care about money and power even if that means ending our world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid Oreo
1 minute ago, Stupid Oreo said:

80x Manhattan what are these measurements I-

in the sense of 

 

‘who uses manhattan as a measurement scale’ :derpga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
2 minutes ago, Stupid Oreo said:

in the sense of 

 

‘who uses manhattan as a measurement scale’ :derpga:

They actually do use Manhattan a lot as a measurement scale. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
18 minutes ago, Aphasic said:

There are a bunch of good ideas to reduce the decay of our world but governments won't allow them because they care about money and power even if that means ending our world.

Well the proposal i mentioned wouldnt stop economic interests. If anything it would allow a less agressive and expensive rapid transition to carbon neutral because global cooling thru aerosols according to estimates could be done with as little as a few dozen billion dollars per year which globally is a drop in the bucket in costs

 

But scientists thenselves are worried about potential unintentional consequences so obviously slowing global warming thru decarbonization is preferable

 

But im just saying it may not be enough at this point

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arizonadream777
32 minutes ago, Aphasic said:

We're literally little creatures and look at what we have done! Not a meteorite but tiny humans are ending the world this time around.

 

27 minutes ago, Aphasic said:

There are a bunch of good ideas to reduce the decay of our world but governments won't allow them because they care about money and power even if that means ending our world.

Right?  What good is money and power if you die before you use it!? Idiots !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aphasic
7 minutes ago, Economy said:

Well the proposal i mentioned wouldnt stop economic interests. If anything it would allow a less agressive and expensive rapid transition to carbon neutral because global cooling thru aerosols according to estimates could be done with as little as a few dozen billion dollars per year which globally is a drop in the bucket in costs

 

But scientists thenselves are worried about potential unintentional consequences so obviously slowing global warming thru decarbonization is preferable

 

But im just saying it may not be enough at this point

I heard about it in Kiss The Earth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...