Jump to content
politics

2 Women 1 Podium


Concertaholic

Featured Posts

Concertaholic

Y'all ready to see one of the most significant moments in American history tonight? In America's 244 year existence, there has only ever been two men sitting behind the president during his State of the Union speech. Nancy Pelosi broke the glass ceiling in 2007 by being the first woman Speaker of the House, and therefore the first woman to sit behind the president during the speech. Now for the very first time, two women will be seated behind the president, our first female Speaker of the House joined by our first female Vice President, Kamala Harris! :excited:

e1e29e-20130213-obama.jpg

harris-and-pelosi.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

weed

woww!! That's exciting. Not a big fan of either lmao but still very exciting in the grand scheme

Link to post
Share on other sites

JRCF29
13 minutes ago, Concertaholic said:

In America's 244 year existence, there has only ever been two men sitting behind the president during his State of the Union speech. Nancy Pelosi broke the glass ceiling in 2007 by being the first woman Speaker of the House, and therefore the first woman to sit behind the president during the speech.

 

Both of these statements can't be true...

Don't Call Me Gaga
Link to post
Share on other sites

Concertaholic
4 minutes ago, JRCF29 said:

 

Both of these statements can't be true...

 

In America's 244 year existence, there has always been a man sitting behind the president during his State of the Union speech. Nancy Pelosi broke the glass ceiling in 2007 by being the first woman Speaker of the House, and therefore the first woman to sit behind the president during the speech.

Happy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IllusionLover
20 minutes ago, Concertaholic said:

harris-and-pelosi.png

Ok but why do they look the same in this pic? :bear:

13 | this is my dancefloor i fought for, your voice is louder, it echoes
Link to post
Share on other sites

PartySick

You really had to phrase it like that? :air:

But yes, this is going to be awesome :flutter:

Whimsical bitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

pdaines
20 minutes ago, JRCF29 said:

 

Both of these statements can't be true...

Technically, it is not true that both statements have the characteristic of incapacity for truth. It is only true that they cannot both be simultaneously true. You know, if you want to nitpick at the OP, you probably want to be careful with your own phrasing. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

River
1 hour ago, PartySick said:

You really had to phrase it like that? :air:

But yes, this is going to be awesome :flutter:

omg the memories, why did I click that link, I still regret it :fatcat:

 

So sploosh your juice all over me you Riverboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

TEANUS

Just wish one of them wasn’t the literal wicked witch of the west :diane:

British social ladies with upturned pinkies, glasses clinking // xoxoTEANUS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...