Supersonic 49,376 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 Yesterday a German high court in Schwesig has ruled that the non-consentual removal of a condom during sex constitutes the criminal offence of rape. Back in November 2020 a lower court ruled that "stealthing" does not constitute any criminal offences and aquitted a man who admitted in doing so during sex. The victim and the district attorney appealed the decision and the case was ruled in their favor. Now the case goes back to the lower courts to decide the degree of penalty the defendant will receive. This verdict is seen as a HUGE progress in Germany's history of dealing with rape trials and an affirmative sign for victims of rape. https://www.nordbayern.de/panorama/heimlich-das-kondom-abgezogen-oberlandesgericht-hebt-freispruch-auf-1.10933574 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 I totally agree. If you consent to protected sex, you have NOT consented to unprotected sex. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsemanche 97,808 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 This is 100% non-consensual. I hope more countries make the same ruling, it's about time. Soft, soothing, and succulent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wixson 5,004 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 Isn't this already a thing in the UK? I May Destroy You thought me that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bionic 50,111 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 Just now, Wixson said: Isn't this already a thing in the UK? I May Destroy You thought me that. Yes, seems like it became a settled matter in 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSUNAMI 21,297 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 I love living in progressive country. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyniildisk 12,689 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 oh i didn't know that was a thing and it makes total sense, i hope other countries follow! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 Miz Cracker is shaking in her boots. Finally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlepotter 76,612 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 This is great, but I don't understand the technicalities of this, is the person who removed the condom held accountable in case there's pregnancy/STD or..? How do they investigate the case, or take into account that condoms very easily slip.. how do they do it in the UK chaeri pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlepotter 76,612 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 5 minutes ago, Yennefer Stark said: Miz Cracker is shaking in her boots. Wait what??? chaeri pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franch Toast 27,737 Posted March 19, 2021 Share Posted March 19, 2021 Good. A friend of mine was the victim of stealthing. She consented to have protected sex with someone who proceeded to remove the condom beforehand, and when she told him no, he then forced himself on her condomless, saying he wanted to get her pregnant so she'd never leave him. She filed a report with the police but chose not to press charges for various reasons, but she did make the dude drive her to get Plan B the next day. She/Her/Hers Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 On 3/19/2021 at 4:48 PM, littlepotter said: Wait what??? She wrote a whole article justifying stealthing and saying there’s more important issues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 117,131 Posted March 20, 2021 Share Posted March 20, 2021 Good. Also they to convict ghosting (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ ᶠʳᵒⁿᵗ ᵗᵒʷᵃʳᵈ ᵉⁿᵉᵐʸ (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster647 444 Posted March 21, 2021 Share Posted March 21, 2021 Good. I don't know how it would be proven if there was not a consequence (STD transmission, Unwanted Pregnancy) and the accusee refused to come clean but regardless, it's good that the precedence is being set to show that stealthing is not okay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.