SlipAway 880 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 12 minutes ago, damag said: Im not even white lol. I work in law, so I understand it in a legal standpoint. It’s not about trusting the system or not, it’s the way the law is written in each state. Depending on how it’s written, it’s how an attorney can put a criminal charge on someone. You do realize that we actually see your profile pic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chromatography 10,186 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 31 minutes ago, Ariana Grindr said: Rih Rih said not today satan, not today. such a powerful gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 3 minutes ago, SlipAway said: You do realize that we actually see your profile pic Yeah I do, I’m not dumb. I’m Mexican, not white. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlondeQueenOfGGD 25,454 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 52 minutes ago, damag said: She needs to stick to her makeup and music. I don’t know how the law is in Louisville, but usually if something doesn’t proceed legally is because there is issues in the case. And for someone to charge someone with criminal charges they have to be able to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. (I’m not defending Mr. Cameron) You’re literally defending Mr. Cameron sis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ariana Grindr 3,173 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 1 hour ago, damag said: Yeah I do, I’m not dumb. I’m Mexican, not white. No you’re not. We no longer claim you sis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StarstruckIllusion 52,902 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 1 hour ago, damag said: I’m no one. I didn’t offended anyone. Yet you can come and assume things about me. Learn how to dialogue in a civil way. Never said for her to “shut up” I just simply said she needs to stick to what she does. How can someone come and say you need to do this (legal action) without having an education in law. Grow Saying toxic things with a smile doesnt save you from criticism. What’s next, forbidding her from sleeping bc that’s not music and makeup? As if she doesn’t do other things in life? Don’t come for her with an “uninformed opinion” as if you just didn’t serve something worse Also, “I didn’t offend anyone”... what? That’s not for you to decide. You can say “I didn’t mean to offend anyone” but don’t say I’m sad when I’m smiling... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sailormari 41 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 2 hours ago, damag said: Yeah I do, I’m not dumb. I’m Mexican, not white. you can be white and mexican lmaooo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 124,471 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 3 hours ago, damag said: Never said for her to “shut up” I just simply said she needs to stick to what she does. Telling someone to "stick to what they do" is another way of saying "shut up and stay in your lane". What is this clownery... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarence 1,444 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 LMAO this whole thread is just yall draggin that gremlin. talkin bout "stick to makeup and music" like she aint a human being. tf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
damag 200 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 You guys need to grow up, “Section 507.020 - Murder (1) A person is guilty of murder when: (a) With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the death of such person or of a third person; except that in any prosecution a person shall not be guilty under this subsection if he acted under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, the reasonableness of which is to be determined from the viewpoint of a person in the defendant's situation under the circumstances as the defendant believed them to be. However, nothing contained in this section shall constitute a defense to a prosecution for or preclude a conviction of manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime; or (b) Including, but not limited to, the operation of a motor vehicle under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a grave risk of death to another person and thereby causes the death of another person. (2) Murder is a capital offense. KRS 507.020 Effective:July 13, 1984 Amended 1984 Ky. Acts ch. 165, sec. 26, effectiveJuly 13, 1984. -- Amended 1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 15, sec. 1, effective December 22, 1976. --Amended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 183, sec. 1. -- Created 1974 Ky. Acts ch. 406, sec. 61, effective January 1, 1975.” That’s the murder charge in the state of Kentucky. That’s my point, the way that code is written to, can prosecution prove the actions with the evidence they have in the investigation? Can we figure that out if we don’t have access to the whole investigation? No. I’m just speaking factual points, one of them Rihanna is not an attorney. If you guys get offended by that then that’s on you. If you guys are defending your points of views with Ethos and Pathos that’s on you. I’m using Logos. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ziggy 11,877 Posted February 3, 2021 Share Posted February 3, 2021 12 hours ago, damag said: Im not even white lol. I work in law, so I understand it in a legal standpoint. It’s not about trusting the system or not, it’s the way the law is written in each state. Depending on how it’s written, it’s how an attorney can put a criminal charge on someone. Yeah but that’s the issue, aint it? Saying “that’s the way the law works” instead of “this is the way it should work” because clearly this situation and scores of others show that discrimination, racism, and the protection of supremacy are built into the legal system. So by you taking the time to say someone advocating for that needs to take a seat and study law is not only condescending, it is an endorsement of the legal system as it is and by extension of the supremacy it defends. that’s the issue here, white or not. You can’t be claiming you are in favor of BLM if you also want to defend the legal system. Then you jump in with some English 101 “this is logos argument” shtick to defend that once again you aren’t interested in improving the system but in A) being right and B) in defending the status quo. I don’t know you personally, but from your statements, this is how you come off. If that isn’t you, I love that. This is a good chance to revise how we conduct ourselves (on all fronts not just you) so that our points and opinions are crystal clear. Arguing the semantics of law is a privilege not afforded to, say, Brianna Taylor. If we’re in favor of the same goals here, we also need to be cognizant of how we use our voices. It has impact. Choosing to take a stance that doesn’t equivocally come out *against* the legal system in this case can and clearly will be read as endorsement of it. We just have to be sure we’re careful. You understanding law is of great value to dismantling its weaponization but only if you apply your skills that way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.5165a13374c4ef6cf171e720c76e9d1d.jpeg)
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.