Lets settle this once and for all

[Ronk 10,660]

1 hour ago, GreatestThing said:

They are both incredible, her vocals and performance fit the respective event perfectly

This.  I can't choose because they were both amazing.

[G U C C I 2,864]

To me both versions are amazing and I love that they are so different. The 2016 one is better vocally but I chose 2021 because of how gorgeous she looked and the emotion she was able to convey while singing it. 

[Killa 11,766]

2021 for the look the other was very musical and well interpreted. 

Unfortunatelty if she would nail in 2021 shed have to bore you in a way. Singing with the band in such conditions where theres no comunication is extremely difficult. Rythm is the most important thing, you must be a metronome. 

She was very smart bringing the pianist. And ofc the pressure for inauguration is even higher. Tho the other had her reputation on the line

[CannaeDrive 2,988]

2021 for the moment, emotion and the meaning of that special performance.

[littlepotter 47,047]

22 minutes ago, MOT said:

I wouldn't disagree with any of that, and I hadn't thought about the possible meaning of splitting land, I wouldnt put that past her, but in deciding on the arrangement I presume you also have to factor in what you think you're capable of, or what rehearsals tell you you're capable of.

I think it's technically easier for her to have continued on the same tempo as the previous line. Her slowing it down makes it harder. It's a lot easier to belt out a high note at the end of a line rather than just belt straight out of silence like she did with "there" because it's harder to get it directly on pitch (and that's why she was a bit shaky there). So it's definitely a choice for emphasis imo

Edited January 25 by littlepotter

[MOT 620]

1 minute ago, littlepotter said:

I think it's technically easier for her to have continued on the same tempo as the previous line. Her slowing it down makes it harder. It's a lot easier to belt out a high note at the end of a line rather than just belt straight out of silence like she did with "there" because it's harder to get it directly on pitch (and that's why she was a bit shaky there). So it's definitely a choice for emopasis imo

Thanks. That's exactly the sort of stuff that I don't know.

[L E O 6,035]

2016, but the 2021 outfit >>>

[KEVIN STEVE 13,962]

2013

[artd0me 198]

2 hours ago, gypsy101 said:

wdym? lots of big singers have sang this song (whitney houston comes to mind)

Well, I never had the urge to listen to it, I’m not American. So if Gaga had never sung it, I probably wouldn’t have heard it so far 🤷🏼‍♂️

[gypsy101 4,081]

Just now, artd0me said:

Well, I never had the urge to listen to it, I’m not American. So if Gaga had never sung it, I probably wouldn’t have heard it so far 🤷🏼‍♂️

wow that's sad, it's a pretty good song imo

[MotherOfPuppies 5,338]

Gaga is even competing against herself.

 

I loved both performances so much... outfit-wise I loved 2021 a lot more and there was even more emotions... vocally I thought both performances were absolutely great.... so I'm gonna go with 2021

Edited January 25 by NickyPuppy

[Rebel 460]

There's a key change in 2016 that sounds close to Whitney. It was perfect.

[JusKeepBreathin 15,726]

2021 was over sung and shakey.

[Amphetamine 2,956]

32 minutes ago, gypsy101 said:

wow that's sad, it's a pretty good song imo

It is a beautiful song, but I wouldn't say it's "sad" that someone from a different country doesn't regularly listen to different renditions of our national anthem lol. Do you ever listen to Germany's national anthem? (where I'm assuming the user is from based on his instagram) 

[Amphetamine 2,956]

OT: both were beautiful but I preferred the pacing of the super bowl version. The inauguration version seemed a bit rushed at moments, but in terms of appearance I liked what she was wearing better at the inauguration.