Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
society

Angela Merkel and France Oppose Trump's Twitter Ban


Economy

Featured Posts

Bonkers

So a *President of the United States* doesn't necessarily need to have the maturity or self control to operate within Twitter's TOS.  

:saladga:

Remember to like and subscribe, and click on the bell icon to get the latest updates
Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, xoxo Craig said:

Well tbh, how accurate is this article? It could just be made up

It’s Bloomberg though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

xoxo Craig
1 minute ago, Aussie said:

It’s Bloomberg though...

Its just there's no offical sources within the article

End Racism Now
Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
2 hours ago, xoxo Craig said:

Well tbh, how accurate is this article? It could just be made up

 

2 hours ago, Aussie said:

It’s Bloomberg though...

This is the Canadian Bloomberg from BNN (Business News Network). It's literally the most reputable news source in the entire country for anything business or politics

 

It's exceptionally rare that they get something wrong. It can happen but it's very rare. And if they aren't certain about something they will usually use wordings like "according to some sources" or "reports are saying"

 

If they are presenting it was factual news I presume they must have some kind of reliable source. This is not The Sun or some online blog

Link to post
Share on other sites

SpadesToStart

Disagree with their points. Government officials shouldn't be above censure by independent parties if they're spewing misinformation and inciting violence. If the GOP-run Senate won't check Trump (which they have shown time and time again they won't), then I say let Big Tech do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oriane

When Trump was banned, I checked Twitter to see the reactions and there were so many people in France who were opposing it and supporting him, it was crazy.

The only GGD member who can read / Credits to Celloo Deng for the profile pic!
Link to post
Share on other sites

I get where they're coming from, blocking social media accounts of politicians is very touchy. In this case however, not only was Trump in direct breach of Twitter's code of conduct, he was going beyond Super Saiyan megalomaniac mob-enticing tyrant. 

Presidents shouldn't be held to lower standards than the population as a whole. Actions have consequences, and these consequences would have been the same for any normal individual actively promoting disinformation like he has (and enforced much sooner). Twitter looked away for a long time precisely because they knew blocking him was an explosive situation in the making. If they followed through this time, it's because action was required.

Link to post
Share on other sites

StarstruckIllusion

Okay but these yeehawdists and other y’allqaeda members being left alone to radicalize on their own echo chambers is scary tho :/ 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TimisaMonster

There must be a mistake or something lost in translation...

Stream my new single, 💜"Heartbeat"💜, on Spotify!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Europe is obsessed with the concept of Freedom of Speech (which is beautiful) but it is to the point that they sometimes forget that speech can be as dangerous as a gun and that not everyone deserves that freedom..for some it must be a treated as a privilege. Trump incited an attempted coup d'etat and riled up his fans to hurt people in the government. That is terrorism. Terrorism is politically or ideologically motivated and what we saw happen killed 5 lives and was highly politically motivated. Would Angela or Macron allow someone who incited a terror attack to have a twitter account? I don't think so. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...