KindHML 378 Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 Can't wait to discover the campaign. So hype. Gaga will surprise us and the world. Asking myself which song's the next single. Alice? Free Woman? SFA? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
27monster27 11,486 Posted August 3, 2020 Share Posted August 3, 2020 The tweet was deleted. he/him/his Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiQuenDroid 5,059 Posted August 3, 2020 Author Share Posted August 3, 2020 9 minutes ago, 27monster27 said: The tweet was deleted. Yes. Apparently Valentino doesn't appreciate this "leak"... All I ever wanted was love... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inferno 2,880 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 7 hours ago, OMonster said: I appreciate this, and thank you for taking the time to contribute to my perspective. My 'problem', though, is that much of what you have just highlighted can be achieved, straight-up, without all of the compromising deals. I've always 'liked' the Tudor Watch partnership, for the reasons you've highlighted. I think her message is very clear with that, and I agree, it is a good and sensible business move, even beyond the cash. But, as for the others... she didn't need them to achieve anything. Sure, I'm not denying they're 'good' at catapulting her brand and making money - that's show business, after all - but I stand by my comment that most of these moves are diluting her authenticity as an ARTIST. And to summarise my point: Lady Gaga doesn't NEED to 'broker deals' to contribute to the causes she cares about. She is most likely heading toward a net worth of $500M, at this point. There is nothing she ever has to do again to change the world in whatever way she wants to do - nothing. These deals, imo, are far more about 'self-preservation' (if you can call it that, when we're talking hundreds of millions, here) interwoven with charitable causes, than they are about charitable causes, period. And again, there's nothing wrong with that, as such - I just don't find it particularly comfortable or inspiring to witness Gaga grow her wealth so exponentially, whilst her artistic output lessens in both frequency and, to an extent, passion. I fell in love with Gaga for her perspective, her music, her art, her talent... not her savvy moves as a philanthropist that, frankly, can, more often than not, come at the expense of the former. I end on this: do you really believe that Gaga is taking these deals for the wider good? She doesn't need money to do that - she's already got it. When it comes to philanthropy specifically yes, I do believe shes doing it for the greater good and for her own heart. When it comes to Tudor watches and makeup, I think thats about the brand. I find it incredibly odd that its her philanthropic efforts specifically that you question yet some random partnership with a luxury watch company for profit is what you highlight as positive? lol that doesn't make any sense to me. You must just not agree with her politics therefore dislike her philanthropic efforts I assume? I do agree that all of the above has made her deviate from her music career. I think its been many many years since shes had passion for pop music. I don't think shes as invested in it as she once was to say the least. Thats obvious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatieJudasGaga4 67,907 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 It's not lmao Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaLuna 12,732 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 Oh, so she's releasing a new perfume? After saying she was basically forced to release Fame and Eau de Gaga? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 32 minutes ago, KatieJudasGaga4 said: The photo was fake Who said that ? is it confirmed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatieJudasGaga4 67,907 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 3 minutes ago, JOSHMATICA said: Who said that ? is it confirmed? I saw a tweet that said the photo was posted on Facebook 3 weeks ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
My Name Isnt Alice 3,737 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 1 minute ago, KatieJudasGaga4 said: I saw a tweet that said the photo was posted on Facebook 3 weeks ago Posted by whom? It's still a new pic tho Maybe no one noticed 3 weeks ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatieJudasGaga4 67,907 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 Just now, My Name Isnt Alice said: Posted by whom? It's still a new pic tho Maybe no one noticed 3 weeks ago Someone would've posted the photo 3 weeks ago though. I highly doubt someone wouldn't have noticed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantasmas 9,970 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 8 hours ago, TerrenceV2 said: What’s left on the list? Her own tequila brand? Smh sign me up, betch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doot 2 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 3 hours ago, KatieJudasGaga4 said: Someone would've posted the photo 3 weeks ago though. I highly doubt someone wouldn't have noticed Lowkey I figured it was fake. They photoshopped her face from the Vogue shoot I feel. Could be wrong tho. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
10inch 417 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 17 hours ago, thatfoxyfeeling said: This looks underwhelming? She looks beautiful but surely this is fake? Just googled it and it's not fake. There is a print of the promo/ad on a magazine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatieJudasGaga4 67,907 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 2 minutes ago, Pipipi said: Just googled it and it's not fake. There is a print of the promo/ad on a magazine. oh, well... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
10inch 417 Posted August 4, 2020 Share Posted August 4, 2020 1 minute ago, KatieJudasGaga4 said: oh, well... She looks gorge! Probably not the aesthetic we were hungry but still a serve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.