Jump to content
question

Are music critics getting kinder?


Sorcerer

Featured Posts

Sorcerer

Or are artists releasing better work?

Lady Gaga only got a 71 Metascore for The Fame and Born This Way, which are her breakthrough albums. She gets her highest score with Chromatica at 79, which is preceded by A Star is Born's 78 score.

Taylor Swift's Red, considered by Pitchfork and many fans as her best album, only got a 77 Metascore. Meanwhile, she gets the two highest scores of her career with Lover (79) and the highly acclaimed, folklore (94).

Ariana Grande received a 64 for My Everything. Her newer R&B-oriented releases produced 81 for Sweetener and 86 for than u, next, her most acclaimed album yet.

Additionally, Selena Gomez got her highest Metascore for Rare (76). 

Discuss.

:oprah:

Link to post
Share on other sites

veteran artists evolve from their previous works (we hope) so there's context and comparison involved

ice heard one side from above
Link to post
Share on other sites

FfFfFfFF

Yes. If you follow metacritic, it's easy to see how scores keep getting higher. With pop stars starting to get scores in the 90a, 80+ is no longer that impressive anymore. However one of the most acclaimed singers in history (Bjork) never had a score over 90.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TWICE on hatius

Younger writers.

I supposed most of them are more open minded to new sounds and not constantly compare younger artists with the veteran in the past (I'm looking at those OGHs working at slant and NYT who constantly bring up gaga and madonna comparision in their reviews).

Please ignore the spelling in username. I am a Beyonce stan afterall.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Taylucifer

I think a big part of it is people are more open to different styles of music so I think they are more open which I turn has lead to better scores

'The Life of a Showgirl' is out on Oct 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s both metacritic and the artists.

Metacritic is now more open-minded and respectful to artists that are pop and hip-hop. 

The artists we all are familiar of grow and evolve. Making better quality music and maturity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD

Why do we to assume they are instead of music quality is getting better so they have no choice but to stan? :shrug:

Beaides, isn't it great that pop music is not seen as low brow anymore? Why is this a problem for you? :shrug:

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ dancin' until i'm dead (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate the fact that Chromatica and Lover both got a damn 79. Chromatica, to me, is light years ahead of Lover, which is Taylor's absolute worst album. I should become a music critic to fix tragedies such as these. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wet Fire

Lover 79 and Sweetner 81? :air:

The Fame Monster 78 :bear:

Yes. They are definitely getting kinder. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorcerer
1 hour ago, RAMROD said:

Why do we to assume they are instead of music quality is getting better so they have no choice but to stan? :shrug:

Beaides, isn't it great that pop music is not seen as low brow anymore? Why is this a problem for you? :shrug:

I said in the first sentence that it's also possible that artists are releasing better work. :saladga:

In what way did I say I saw this as a problem? :interestinga:

Link to post
Share on other sites

RAMROD
4 minutes ago, Sorceress said:

I said in the first sentence that it's also possible that artists are releasing better work. :saladga:

In what way did I say I saw this as a problem? :interestinga:

Maybe just the way it was worded got me wrong idea. IDK. :triggered:

(ノ◕ヮ◕)ノ✧*:・゚ dancin' until i'm dead (*´艸`*) ♡♡♡
Link to post
Share on other sites

ArtpopAct2

Yeah, I think a big part of it is that people are starting to miss pop music as it hasn’t dominated in while 

Back then it was popular but cool to hate on it, albums like BTW and Teenage Dream absolutely deserved higher scores.

Like I’m sorry I love Chromatica but BTW is still Gaga’s best work. Chromatica score is great, BTW deserves high 80s-low 90s. Can’t believe how much I still use that album, and how I manage to put so many people onto its deep cuts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ssslyboy
2 hours ago, ice bear said:

veteran artists evolve from their previous works (we hope) so there's context and comparison involved

This. If they see growth they reward it.  Sometimes the album isn’t even a masterpiece but it gets better reviews because of the evolution involved. Also critics seem to retroactively respect artists’ earlier works if the artist has evolved. That’s why when 40th anniversary editions, etc are released they often get wildly better reviews than they did upon initial release.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many critics like to see „depth“ in artists’ work. With pop music, they tend to recognize this only at a later point of the artist‘s career.

So in retrospect, they might give Gaga‘s earlier work a higher score.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AntonTurnItUp

Lover 79, Folklore 94 and thank u, next 86 :wtfga:

ASIB 78 and Chromatica 79...

 

They're tasteless :vegas:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...