Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Hi guys, we have an emergency! Chromatica just scores 79 at Metacritic, one point to 80 and only two for an universal acclaim Los Angeles Times have made a positive review for Chromatica (May 31) and weren't added yet, which is funny since a later review (June 12) were WHY? Is Metacritic sabotaging Gaga? Let's fix this injustice Do enter Mikael Wood (the reviewer) profile: https://www.latimes.com/people/mikael-wood Text him in his email and social medias, say that his review for Chromatica were unfairly left by Metacritic Send emails to Metacritic itself too: [email protected] or tag them in twitter: https://twitter.com/metacritic Example Brothers, that's our last chance to get a UA finally for Gaga, I need your help Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Solidarity up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Solidarity up 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Solidarity up 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr S 8,477 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Email is better. If y'all do it on Twitter with names like "gagafan" etc then it just makes us look like crazy stans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, Mr S said: Email is better. If y'all do it on Twitter with names like "gagafan" etc then it just makes us look like crazy stans. Yep, make everything possible It's just unfair that a good review which can push Chromatica to universal acclaim status be lost Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dilwyn 4,090 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 that review is a 75 by the metric they used i dont think is gonna help Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elijahfan 25,387 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 25 minutes ago, Mr S said: Email is better. If y'all do it on Twitter with names like "gagafan" etc then it just makes us look like crazy stans. Which we are Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blastertoyo 22,728 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 33 minutes ago, Mr S said: Email is better. If y'all do it on Twitter with names like "gagafan" etc then it just makes us look like crazy stans. Time to break out the soccer mom accounts again please enlighten me to death Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 28 minutes ago, Dilwyn said: that review is a 75 by the metric they used i dont think is gonna help But the weight will be as 85 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AliceIsThatBitch 545 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Be careful what you wish for. If it ends up being 70-75 it may bring us down one point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
littlepotter 74,695 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 LA Times reviews haven't counted since 2002, how many times do we have to say it... chaeri pls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsemanche 92,297 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 Dramatica Soft, soothing, and succulent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven 5,714 Posted June 21, 2020 Share Posted June 21, 2020 79 is a good score, it’s her highest rated album so lets chill and relax. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 On 6/21/2020 at 1:25 PM, littlepotter said: LA Times reviews haven't counted since 2002, how many times do we have to say it... [...] which is funny since a later review (June 12) were [...] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.