Jump to content
news

Law Firm Representing Gaga Suffers Data Breach


Sorcerer

Featured Posts

blankpaper
2 minutes ago, spamuelbtanner said:

the other week I was looking at the website that sold her home with the studio and it had the address, it's really not hard to find her address as bad as that is.

I know, I’ve driven past her house just to see what it was like haha. It’s totally unassuming, and it’s weird to think someone that famous lives somewhere like that 

reality’s tight if the music is right
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply
President Biden
1 hour ago, Franch Toast said:

This sucks for all involved. And there are a lot of people involved:

On the music front, according to the firm’s previously published list of clients, those include: AC/DC, Avicii, Barbra Streisand, Barry Manilow, Bebe Rexha, Bette Midler, Bruce Springsteen, the David Bowie Estate, Drake, Elton John, Fiona Apple, Future, Jessie Reyez, John Mellencamp, Lady Gaga, Lil Nas X, Lil Wayne, Lionel Richie, Lizzo, Madonna, Maroon 5, Nas, OK Go, Ricky Martin, Rod Stewart, Shania Twain, Sting, The Weeknd, Timbaland, Tony Bennett, U2, Usher and the Whitney Houston Estate.

Other talent and execs repped by Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks include Andrew Lloyd Webber, Barbara Walters, Clive Davis, David Geffen, David Letterman, Diane Sawyer, Gayle King, Iman, Irving Azoff, Jimmy Iovine, Kate Upton, Maria Shriver, Mariska Hargitay, Martha Stewart, Meg Ryan, Mikhail Baryshnikov, Nancy Grace, Naomi Campbell, Priyanka Chopra, Richard Plepler, Robert De Niro, Shay Mitchell, Sofia Vergara, Spike Lee, and the Osbournes (Ozzy, Sharon and Kelly).

Athletes who are listed as clients include Cam Newton, Colin Kaepernick, Henrik Lundqvist, LeBron James, Mike Tyson, Scottie Pippen, Sean Avery, Sloane Stephens and Victor Cruz.

I hope the hackers don't end up releasing anything seriously damaging. The only "silver lining" I can find is that Gaga is only one of many, many clients, so if something does come out about her, hopefully it will be dwarfed by something juicier about someone else, say maybe Facebook/Mark Z (apparently FB is one of the clients). But I truly don't wish anything personal or potentially embarrassing/damaging/hurtful to emerge about any one involved. 

:saladga:omg. 

I got drunk
Link to post
Share on other sites

numb the flame
1 minute ago, blankpaper said:

I know, I’ve driven past her house just to see what it was like haha. It’s totally unassuming, and it’s weird to think someone that famous lives somewhere like that 

wait whatttt PM me sis :ladyhaha:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dima
4 hours ago, LilyLark said:

People who steal social security #s can do serious financial crimes and even steal someone's identity (the latter impossible to do with celebs, obvs.).

Thank u <3

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagzus
5 hours ago, LilyLark said:

Yeah, it likely would have her discussing his abuse/assault which would be the big thing. Really, really hope it stays sealed for that reason alone, since she clearly doesn't want to discuss how he (and it very likely was him) assaulted her.

He's such a f*cking creep. I never knew he said that about Paparazzi. I never really speculated about who was guilty of the assault, as clearly she isn't ready to reveal it...but when he tweeted that sh*t about Tony, combined with his previous slut-shamey comments a decade ago, it convinced me it had to be him cause a) he fits the criteria and b) the comments, even the one with Tony, are textbook abusive behavior with a predatory sexist slant.

He also fits it because he was the only producer she worked with when she was 19, she only started moving to the lower east side and recording music properly in like 2005/2006 and he was the only producer she was working with. He had the drive to try and get her signed to a label, plus they would listen to men and producers especially more back then before this new gen of female popstars came around after Gaga, he seemed controlling from the footage we have of him from back then even sitting in on her record label meetings and tryna talk for her. He gave me the vibes Poppy’s weird producer and manager does when he controls her image.

I think it’s obvious she stayed with him to make sure she got signed to a label, did what she had to do sadly :(.

Link to post
Share on other sites

gagzus
1 hour ago, spamuelbtanner said:

the other week I was looking at the website that sold her home with the studio and it had the address, it's really not hard to find her address as bad as that is.

In all fairness that isn’t her actual home she owns it for when she’s making albums so she can record all day and night without having to leave a studio to be harassed by fans and paps to go home like she used to do in LA before she bought it and in NYC originally.

Her actual home is the farm in Malibu that’s near a random road, the beach and fields that she owns the land for a good mile or two around it. The one she shot all her shoots in during the 5F2 documentary and where she went for a walk-and-talk interview on a trail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maleficent
3 hours ago, Franch Toast said:

hope the hackers don't end up releasing anything seriously damaging. The only "silver lining" I can find is that Gaga is only one of many, many clients, so if something does come out about her, hopefully it will be dwarfed by something juicier about someone else, say maybe Facebook/Mark Z (apparently FB is one of the clients). But I truly don't wish anything personal or potentially embarrassing/damaging/hurtful to emerge about any one involved. 

hope there’s nothing damaging or incriminating in those files in the first place. embarrassing? sure, probably some things in their gaga doesn’t want out. but i like to think the woman i do respect hasn’t done anything that would be damaging to her career if it got out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

blankpaper
2 minutes ago, gagzus said:

In all fairness that isn’t her actual home she owns it for when she’s making albums so she can record all day and night without having to leave a studio to be harassed by fans and paps to go home like she used to do in LA before she bought it and in NYC originally.

Her actual home is the farm in Malibu that’s near a random road, the beach and fields that she owns the land for a good mile or two around it. The one she shot all her shoots in during the 5F2 documentary and where she went for a walk-and-talk interview on a trail.

She hasn’t been in Malibu since the fires. She lives at the Zappa house 

reality’s tight if the music is right
Link to post
Share on other sites

boyerased

I hope nothing will come out. More than that 2012-2013 got a lot of **** that we don’t know. We might have tea about cancelled projects but the management transfer, Gaga’s health condition and *this is me speculating* things going down with Tara. On top of that the whole Fusari thing that I know shouldn’t be brought up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LilMonst3r

I did see this coming, more peoole at home these cirperations are more succeptible to getting hacked. Might get worst. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Papergangstuh

I don’t want anything bad about Gaga. But girl I’m ready to be entertained by some of those other names!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creyk
5 hours ago, holy scheisse said:

Anybody remember Gaga's case vs Rob fusari where info was withheld from the public because it would "damage her career"? Still haunts me at night sometimes wondering what that is :gum:

Probably something about her creative involvement in her own music. I don't see what else it could be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

anonanon

I would be surprised if a large quantity of information actually got released. I don't think these types of hackers really care about exposing anyone. They just want money and the law firm will probably pay them out behind the scenes. 

Edited just now by anonanon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...