Android Central: iPhone SE 2020 more powerful processor than Galaxy S20+

[RenegAde 20,560]

Wait until samsung makes a new device..the endless cycle goes on and on 

[GaGaAst 13,124]

7 minutes ago, RenegAde said:

Wait until samsung makes a new device..the endless cycle goes on and on 

actually samsung has Samsung s10e in almost that price range(128GB price of SE) . A better phone than SE sans OS support

[blankpaper 21]

27 minutes ago, FameHookah said:

Not really im just sharing my opinion, not everyone has to like these overpriced and restricted phones.

I do love my iPad Pro 2020 and its pencil tho, that tablet is unmatched.

So according to the Samsung website, the S20 Ultras start at $1,399...and you’re saying Apple is overpriced? 

[RAMROD 117,348]

55 minutes ago, JR Gg said:

Apple's chips are always the most powerful, was there an argument?

Anyway, seems like you don't know much, if any, about mobile tech, because everything else on that phone is dated compared to an Android competitor with the same price range. Offering less for a higher price -- the only difference in value in branding.

 

 

53 minutes ago, FameHookah said:

Android phones stopped being crap since like the s8 lmao, i had an iPhone 11 pro max for like a week and i couldnt stand it, the notch, the closed os, the lack of emulators and stuff, i returned it asap and went to the s20 ultra, the screen is SO smooth (much better than the 60hz on the iPhone).

Android phones also have much better cameras.

But eh, its a matter of prefference i guess.

@VenusHooker  the real question is, how old are YOU?!

you’re talking like I am the one who wrote the article. Besides,  you are likely to post out of salty-ness, before reading the full article as everything else is mentioned there. #ReadingIsFundamental  
 

Also, android central is one of the largest and most trust worthy android sites. They do not do slander, only truths. They especially won’t throw android under the bus unless what they claim, proven and tested is true.

 

[RAMROD 117,348]

Just now, VenusHooker said:

 

#ReadingIsFundamental 

 

Indeed, because I noted on the processor, that even the article noted no android phones can beat currently.

So, really,  the real question is, how old are YOU?!

[Sanju 1,504]

1 hour ago, Queen Bitch said:

Can we stop with these childish feuds over a f*cking phone. Kim, people are dying.

Its kind of weird how much people WANT to fight over these things.. Same with console wars. Like be happy with what you have, stop trying to justify it. 

[SHALLOW 16,469]

Whatever, they both have great performance but the S20+ is waaaaay more modern and has a good battery so... it's still the better phone in my book.

[derpmonster 22,412]

What does this show? That yall are being ripped off by paying over a $1000 when Apple can afford to sell a phone with the same processor for $400.

The camera and screen difference ain't worth $600 sis

[BenG 19,908]

8 minutes ago, SHALLOW said:

Whatever, they both have great performance but the S20+ is waaaaay more modern and has a good battery so... it's still the better phone in my book.

I would hope so. It costs 3x  

[BenG 19,908]

Can't believe some of you are complaining about the notch. Most Android phones can afford to not have one because the face recognition is way less secure than Face ID. Same reason Pixel 4 has such a huge forehead.

[derpmonster 22,412]

31 minutes ago, blankpaper said:

So according to the Samsung website, the S20 Ultras start at $1,399...and you’re saying Apple is overpriced? 

The difference is Samsung has much cheaper models and a multitude of them, not just one. Apple only recently started cheaper tiers. 

Also, Samsung is not the only company that makes Android phones... there's a ton other cheaper ones with similar or better core specs.

[derpmonster 22,412]

Just now, BenG said:

Most Android phones can afford to not have one because the face recognition is way less secure than Face ID.

Still a compromise that no one asked for. They aren't required to have Face ID if Touch ID works. They should've kept the bezel if they couldn't solve the engineering problem of making their Face ID tech work without humongous sensors. Notches are just ugly in general and no one likes that.

[BenG 19,908]

Just now, derpmonster said:

Still a compromise that no one asked for. They aren't required to have Face ID if Touch ID works. They should've kept the bezel if they couldn't solve the engineering problem of making their Face ID tech work without humongous sensors. Notches are just ugly in general and no one likes that.

That's just your opinion. Also, by having a notch, you are able to push some info displayed upwards, leaving more space for the main area. It makes the screen more useful and I think it's a good compromise.

[blankpaper 21]

3 minutes ago, derpmonster said:

The difference is Samsung has much cheaper models and a multitude of them, not just one. Apple only recently started cheaper tiers. 

Also, Samsung is not the only company that makes Android phones... there's a ton other cheaper ones with similar or better core specs.

I know, but he specifically mentioned returning an iPhone 11 Pro Max for a Samsung S20 Ultra, which is why I used that comparison 

[BenG 19,908]

The value of iOS alone is underestimated by many. The Apple ecosystem works so well and a slightly worse spec/design is what many are willing to have. None of the manufacturers have this advantage.