Chromatica's Confirmed Collaborations: My Favourites

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

1 minute ago, StrawberryBlond said:

I went looking deeper into the case to see if I misunderstood something and I really didn't. The only reason why she got let off was because the journalist who conducted the sting proved to be lying at some point and also because it was entrapment and she'd been lead to believe she was getting a role in a movie, that her passing on the details of a drug dealer was a manufactured crime. But I really don't care what the courts say, I have my own moral code. She supplied the actual number of a drug dealer when asked, she even said "half my phone book sells it." And I know she's close to this dealer because there's a photo of them coming back from a holiday today through an airport (God knows what was in those suitcases he was dragging). I don't care if she's never taken drugs or dealt them, she passed on the number of a drug dealer when asked, even bragged about knowing them. You fixed someone up with drugs connections, knowing that they're now going to buy something illegal that could kill them. How could anyone with a heart do that? I know people who have taken drugs but they'd never set someone up with a dealer because they believe it's their decision to take drugs, but they're not going to be responsible for someone else's destruction. Thing is, Tulisa got everything she wanted - fame, money, a £6 million mansion. She could have left her criminal beginnings behind her, she's made it. But no, she still hangs around with shady types and drug dealers.

I know her voice is average at best, her version of Titanium hurts my ears. There's a reason why she never does high notes in her songs and has never been offered the best chances in music as a soloist. And she only wrote half her album, almost all her songs are written by others. I support her in winning her case against the theft of Scream & Shout as I'm always supportive of anyone who gets their work stolen but the rest of her, no sorry, can't support her. She doesn't deserve to work with someone on Gaga's level. She should be grateful with what she managed to achieve with very little talent and go on her way.

If the court says she is innocent, she is innocent. Period. Whether you agree with it or not, she never was in possession or was dealing drugs. The whole thing was fabricated and set up to destroy her name... and the sad thing was that it worked. If you really have a moral code, you wouldn't be still trying to pull this narrative on her. She did a documentary years ago about it, I can't remember what it was called or what channel aired it, but her name is cleared and thats ALL that matters.

You might be mates with a drug dealer, but it doesn't mean that YOU are dealing or taking drugs. Same as you could be mates with someone who smokes 40 a day, are you a smoker too? Especially if it goes to court and the person is found to not be guilty, then at the end of the day it doesn't matter what you believe or what I believe -  in the eyes of the law, she is innocent and never done the things she was accused of. Thats all that matters. 

Her songwriting skills are good and her voice is above average... not the best, but she can sing. It will be interesting to see what comes of it, how the song came about, what happened between Gaga and Tulisa... but from what Tulisa said in the above video, the song might not even make it on the album. I was perplexed when I saw that she had co-written a song with Gaga and confirmed it, but I don't care who Gaga works with... just as long as the person isn't problematic (like Azealia Banks) which Tulisa is not. If the song is great, then at the end of the day I'm happy with it. 

[ThisBitch 3,436]

Don't want you in my bloodline

The only right answer!

[Varo Yan 2,984]

 

[Floppy 7,951]

is @ProjectJoanne confirmed yet?

[StrawberryBlond 14,840]

5 hours ago, xoxo Craig said:

If the court says she is innocent, she is innocent. Period. Whether you agree with it or not, she never was in possession or was dealing drugs. The whole thing was fabricated and set up to destroy her name... and the sad thing was that it worked. If you really have a moral code, you wouldn't be still trying to pull this narrative on her. She did a documentary years ago about it, I can't remember what it was called or what channel aired it, but her name is cleared and thats ALL that matters.

You might be mates with a drug dealer, but it doesn't mean that YOU are dealing or taking drugs. Same as you could be mates with someone who smokes 40 a day, are you a smoker too? Especially if it goes to court and the person is found to not be guilty, then at the end of the day it doesn't matter what you believe or what I believe -  in the eyes of the law, she is innocent and never done the things she was accused of. Thats all that matters. 

Her songwriting skills are good and her voice is above average... not the best, but she can sing. It will be interesting to see what comes of it, how the song came about, what happened between Gaga and Tulisa... but from what Tulisa said in the above video, the song might not even make it on the album. I was perplexed when I saw that she had co-written a song with Gaga and confirmed it, but I don't care who Gaga works with... just as long as the person isn't problematic (like Azealia Banks) which Tulisa is not. If the song is great, then at the end of the day I'm happy with it. 

But she did fix the deal by giving him the number of a dealer when asked if she knew of one. That's drug fixing, which is a crime. So how she got away with it is beyond me. It doesn't matter if it was manufactured or not, it turned out, she was ready to commit a crime if willing, so, how you ended up doing it isn't really the point. Plus, it made a drug dealer known to the police. If anything, I thought they'd praise the journalist for doing some detective work for them. I saw the documentary she did and it actually started out as if her claim to put him in touch with drugs with part of the script she was told to read out that was recorded and taken out of context and I thought, wow, she maybe genuinely got framed. But then it all came out as exactly the way I'd always heard the story. So that was 56 minutes of my life I'll never get back. She certainly proved that money can't buy you class. She even got an assault charge mere weeks later, by the way. She seemed to make mistake after mistake and never learned a thing from them. She seems to be keeping out of trouble for the last few years at least.

We're all allowed our own opinions. I'm intrigued to see what they made together and how involved they were and how. I'd also like to know how much of it she wrote if it is indeed the case. A sample sounds more likely but I suppose stranger things have happened.

[Chic 20,830]

6 hours ago, xoxo Craig said:

If the court says she is innocent, she is innocent. Period.

What a disgrace of an opinion to have. Someone might get away with the crime if they're deemed innocent by the court, but that doesn't mean they are innocent. So many lives have been taken by killers who get off scot-free due to the horrible court systems present in our society.

[Miel 15,009]

idk u Craig but ur on my good list now for acknowledging the Ariana-relative  masterpiece that is Touch It

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

11 minutes ago, Chic said:

What a disgrace of an opinion to have. Someone might get away with the crime if they're deemed innocent by the court, but that doesn't mean they are innocent. So many lives have been taken by killers who get off scot-free due to the horrible court systems present in our society.

But this was not the case here. Tulisa was set up and the court saw that she was being set up and cleared her name

[Chic 20,830]

2 minutes ago, xoxo Craig said:

But this was not the case here. Tulisa was set up and the court saw that she was being set up and cleared her name

I understand that. I'm talking about in general. The statement was a pretty general one, so I responded as such.

[Delusional 9,221]

6 hours ago, StrawberryBlond said:

I went looking deeper into the case to see if I misunderstood something and I really didn't. The only reason why she got let off was because the journalist who conducted the sting proved to be lying at some point and also because it was entrapment and she'd been lead to believe she was getting a role in a movie, that her passing on the details of a drug dealer was a manufactured crime. But I really don't care what the courts say, I have my own moral code. She supplied the actual number of a drug dealer when asked, she even said "half my phone book sells it." And I know she's close to this dealer because there's a photo of them coming back from a holiday today through an airport (God knows what was in those suitcases he was dragging). I don't care if she's never taken drugs or dealt them, she passed on the number of a drug dealer when asked, even bragged about knowing them. You fixed someone up with drugs connections, knowing that they're now going to buy something illegal that could kill them. How could anyone with a heart do that? I know people who have taken drugs but they'd never set someone up with a dealer because they believe it's their decision to take drugs, but they're not going to be responsible for someone else's destruction. Thing is, Tulisa got everything she wanted - fame, money, a £6 million mansion. She could have left her criminal beginnings behind her, she's made it. But no, she still hangs around with shady types and drug dealers.

I know her voice is average at best, her version of Titanium hurts my ears. There's a reason why she never does high notes in her songs and has never been offered the best chances in music as a soloist. And she only wrote half her album, almost all her songs are written by others. I support her in winning her case against the theft of Scream & Shout as I'm always supportive of anyone who gets their work stolen but the rest of her, no sorry, can't support her. She doesn't deserve to work with someone on Gaga's level. She should be grateful with what she managed to achieve with very little talent and go on her way.

Not to start flame bait or any arguments but let’s think about where Gaga’s moral code was when she collaborated with Terry Richardson or R.Kelly?

there were always plenty of rumours and news about these two being problematic but she pushed past it and created art with them and I’m sure she did the same with Tulisa..

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

Just now, DeIusional said:

Not to start flame bait or any arguments but let’s think about where was Gaga’s moral code when she collaborated with Terry Richardson or R.Kelly?

there were always plenty of rumours and news about these two being problematic but she pushed past it and created art with them and I’m sure she did the same with Tulisa..

I just wanna hear it cause I know its gonna be a bop

[Delusional 9,221]

Just now, xoxo Craig said:

I just wanna hear it cause I know its gonna be a bop

this 

I’m sure it’s pop perfection writing, plus if it’s a sample of an older song I think it could be a  subtle hint of tf Gaga with a modern spin 

[Red Velvet 10,988]

That's just their whole discography.

[xoxo Craig 55,649]

3 minutes ago, BLACKPINK said:

That's just their whole discography.

We don't know if Blackpink is actually confirmed, we do have confirmations for the rest of the people in the OP