Jump to content
politics

Biden getting a boost from endorsements


Woolfsmck

Featured Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply
REALITY

Well of course he's going to get a boost from Buttigieg and Klobuchar.

At this point, we can only do our part and vote, and then hope that Bernie has the larger support to ensure him more delegates. This has become much more difficult now that Biden has momentum again. It looks like it'll really go to a brokered convention...

EDIT - Bernie's definitely going to win in California, the problem is by how much. Hopefully Warren doesn't get to that 15% threshold needed to snatch delegates. I also feel like he'll do well in Texas, though, that's definitely more of a contested race.

 

𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔪𝔬𝔫𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯 𝔱𝔬𝔯𝔢 𝔞𝔴𝔞𝔶 𝔦𝔱𝔰 𝔪𝔞𝔰𝔨 𝔞𝔫𝔡...𝔦𝔱𝔰 𝔣𝔞𝔠𝔢 𝔴𝔞𝔰 𝔪𝔦𝔫𝔢.
Link to post
Share on other sites

FeelTheBern

Warren is a fake progressive who’s staying in the race solely to take votes away from Bernie in Super Tuesday. After she loses her home state to Bernie today she will drop out and back Biden too. Her campaign took the gamble in having her flip flop all her policies so she’s a “progressive” and it didn’t work. Now her only goal is to derail the Bernie train with what little money she has left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aga Gydal
9 minutes ago, FeelTheBern said:

Warren is a fake progressive who’s staying in the race solely to take votes away from Bernie in Super Tuesday. After she loses her home state to Bernie today she will drop out and back Biden too. Her campaign took the gamble in having her flip flop all her policies so she’s a “progressive” and it didn’t work. Now her only goal is to derail the Bernie train with what little money she has left.

None of this is true, calm down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FeelTheBern
8 minutes ago, Aga Gydal said:

None of this is true, calm down. 

It’s absolutely true.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/newrepublic.com/amp/article/155756/elizabeth-warren-retreats-medicare

Warren back tracking on Medicare for all when facing backlash for her plan. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/newrepublic.com/amp/article/155756/elizabeth-warren-retreats-medicare

Warren Desperately smearing Bernie of all people as a closeted sexist when her numbers tanked. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/02/20/elizabeth-warren-reverses-her-position-on-super-pac-support.html

Her most recent flip flop is her support of super PACs. She has been against them up until recently and her excuse is because of other candidates use them.
 

She has no integrity or actually views she’s a candidate who will say whatever she needs to get elected with no true values. Unlucky for her people see that she’s not a genuine progressive and she’s lost a ton of support because of it. Unlike Warren, Bernie has 40+ years of fighting for progressive policies. She isn’t there to be a progressive she’s there to disrupt Bernies movement and it’s painfully clear.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
4 minutes ago, FeelTheBern said:

It’s absolutely true.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/newrepublic.com/amp/article/155756/elizabeth-warren-retreats-medicare

Warren back tracking on Medicare for all when facing backlash for her plan. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/newrepublic.com/amp/article/155756/elizabeth-warren-retreats-medicare

Warren Desperately smearing Bernie of all people as a closeted sexist when her numbers tanked. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/02/20/elizabeth-warren-reverses-her-position-on-super-pac-support.html

Her most recent flip flop is her support of super PACs. She has been against them up until recently and her excuse is because of other candidates use them.
 

She has no integrity or actually views she’s a candidate who will say whatever she needs to get elected with no true values. Unlucky for her people see that she’s not a genuine progressive and she’s lost a ton of support because of it. Unlike Warren, Bernie has 40+ years of fighting for progressive policies. She isn’t there to be a progressive she’s there to disrupt Bernies movement and it’s painfully clear.

 

 

 

I'll give u she can flip flop a lot and has career ambitions sure. There's evidence there for that

 

But what makes u think her specific goal is to disrupt Bernie? That seems like conspiracy theorizing now I havent seen any evidence that her purpose in the race is to detail Bernie

Link to post
Share on other sites

littlepotter
32 minutes ago, Aga Gydal said:

None of this is true, calm down. 

Warren's a snake

chaeri pls
Link to post
Share on other sites

littlepotter
6 minutes ago, Economy said:

I'll give u she can flip flop a lot and has career ambitions sure. There's evidence there for that

 

But what makes u think her specific goal is to disrupt Bernie? That seems like conspiracy theorizing now I havent seen any evidence that her purpose in the race is to detail Bernie

Tell me then, what could her goal be? Winning the presidency? Please

chaeri pls
Link to post
Share on other sites

FeelTheBern
2 minutes ago, Economy said:

I'll give u she can flip flop a lot and has career ambitions sure. There's evidence there for that

 

But what makes u think her specific goal is to disrupt Bernie? That seems like conspiracy theorizing now I havent seen any evidence that her purpose in the race is to detail Bernie

Her recent attacks on Bernie and the fact that she has 0 chance to win this election but she stays in while every other moderate candidates who did better then her in the early states dropped out to back Biden. If she was a real supporter of progressive politics then she would of done the smart move and dropped out after South Carolina, backed Bernie, and integrate herself into the Bernie campaign as a cabinet member or potential vp pick. Instead she went with the route of smearing Bernies names with lies and staying in the race with no victory path. She has the same amount of delegates as Amy Klobuchar and Pete has 3x as many as her and they both dropped out. So what other reason would she stay in other then to hurt Bernies campaign. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
Just now, littlepotter said:

Tell me then, what could her goal be? Winning the presidency? Please

She could genuinely just be there still having the hope some big event could turn tables which is known to happen in politics

 

I'm not saying it's likely. But I think it's a very big reach to just assume the reason she hasn't dropped out it to hurt Bernie

 

There's other candidates that had even less support that up until recently stayed in the race like Steyer... Everyone stayed in the race to just hurt Bernie?

 

There's always ppl with no chance that stay running longer than they should. It's a thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Economy
1 minute ago, FeelTheBern said:

Her recent attacks on Bernie and the fact that she has 0 chance to win this election but she stays in while every other moderate candidates who did better then her in the early states dropped out to back Biden. If she was a real supporter of progressive politics then she would of done the smart move and dropped out after South Carolina, backed Bernie, and integrate herself into the Bernie campaign as a cabinet member or potential vp pick. Instead she went with the route of smearing Bernies names with lies and staying in the race with no victory path. She has the same amount of delegates as Amy Klobuchar and Pete has 3x as many as her and they both dropped out. So what other reason would she stay in other then to hurt Bernies campaign. 

This doesn't prove absolutely anything of what ur saying

 

It could simply mean shes holding out some hope... The Bernie comments could also have been to push back a candidate that has been doing better than her and she maybe was hoping to bring him down to bring her up in some dirty politics

 

None of the stuff u mentioned is proof that that her goal is to hurt Bernie

 

It only proves she puts her career at a high priority

 

It could also mean she does not want to support Bernie so she's not gonna drop to support him. There's different degrees of progressiveness after all. She may not wanna back someone that wants to tear down the system when she herself doesnt agree with that so it wouldn't make sense to drop out to back him in that case so just keeps running

 

It doesn't mean it's just for the sake of hurting Bernie

 

I mean it could be. But ur evidence isn't proof. Ur making assumptions

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

FeelTheBern
2 minutes ago, Economy said:

She could genuinely just be there still having the hope some big event could turn tables which is known to happen in politics

 

I'm not saying it's likely. But I think it's a very big reach to just assume the reason she hasn't dropped out it to hurt Bernie

 

There's other candidates that had even less support that up until recently stayed in the race like Steyer... Everyone stayed in the race to just hurt Bernie?

 

There's always ppl with no chance that stay running longer than they should. It's a thing

Steyer, Amy, and Pete all knew they couldn’t win and that them being in the race was hurting Biden’s chances against Bernie. So they did the logical thing and dropped out to support who they want to be the front runner. Then someone like Warren the only other “progressive” candidate who did worse then 2 of those 3 that dropped out stays in the race all while smearing the progressive front runner in the process. If that’s not an attempt to hurt Bernie then I don’t know what is. The moderates are uniting behind Biden while Warren is ruining the chances of a progressive front runner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

FeelTheBern
1 minute ago, Economy said:

This doesn't prove absolutely anything of what ur saying

 

It could simply mean shes holding out some hope... The Bernie comments could also have been to push back a candidate that has been doing better than her and she maybe was hoping to bring him down to bring her up in some dirty politics

 

None of the stuff u mentioned is proof that that her goal is to hurt Bernie

 

It only proves she puts her career at a high priority

 

It could also mean she does not want to support Bernie so she's not gonna drop to support him. There's different degrees of progressiveness after all. She may not wanna back someone that wants to tear down the system when she herself doesnt agree with that so it wouldn't make sense to drop out to back him in that case so just keeps running

 

It doesn't mean it's just for the sake of hurting Bernie

 

I mean it could be. But ur evidence isn't proof. Ur making assumptions

 

 

I guess your somewhat right I wouldn’t call it assumptions just rational thinking to see the obvious. I’m pretty sure I’m right and when she drops out of the race tomorrow or Thursday depending on how long it takes to get the results and backs Biden then I’ll know I’m right. She also  isn’t a candidate who has hope in her campaign if she did she wouldn’t flip flop every time on of her ideas faces a little controversy. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...