SuperPAC spends $700K to attack Bernie Sanders

[Bt1 5,213]

@HorusRa2Cool. I don't know how to describe that u care more about an organization being a PAC or not, instead of denouncing dirty political attacks no matter from where they come. 

 

[HorusRa2 5,005]

1 hour ago, Florin said:

@HorusRa2Cool. I don't know how to describe that u care more about an organization being a PAC or not, instead of denouncing dirty political attacks no matter from where they come. 

 

Ok. Let me make it easier for you to understand. 

 

1. If you're going to say it's a Super Pac, it better be a Super Pac. 

2. The criticism of the ad that the Super Pac used was, "he can't beat Trump," when the only data we have available says otherwise. That's called gaslighting. If you're going to say something, it should be true. People get things wrong and that's okay but we know this is intentional. 

3. There are very real criticisms about Pete Buttieig with regard to issues of race. He didn't handle the situation with the black police chief in South Bend very well and there's plenty of evidence out there showing he's down right done awful things to the homeless in South Bend as well. Not to mention, there are so many black activists speaking out online and to reporters about Pete and his blindspots on race. That's not a dirty political attack to suggest he shouldn't be the nominee. Bernie was criticized for all of 2016 with regards to issues on race and generally speaking african americans have him as their #2 after Joe Biden and many other organizations and surrogates have endorsed the policies and focus Bernie has put to issues plaguing the african american community in particular, not to mention the latino community. 

 

[Bt1 5,213]

5 minutes ago, HorusRa2 said:

Ok. Let me make it easier for you to understand. 

 

1. If you're going to say it's a Super Pac, it better be a Super Pac. 

2. The criticism of the ad that the Super Pac used was, "he can't beat Trump," when the only data we have available says otherwise. That's called gaslighting. If you're going to say something, it should be true. People get things wrong and that's okay but we know this is intentional. 

3. There are very real criticisms about Pete Buttieig with regard to issues of race. He didn't handle the situation with the black police chief in South Bend very well and there's plenty of evidence out there showing he's down right done awful things to the homeless in South Bend as well. Not to mention, there are so many black activists speaking out online and to reporters about Pete and his blindspots on race. That's not a dirty political attack to suggest he shouldn't be the nominee. Bernie was criticized for all of 2016 with regards to issues on race and generally speaking african americans have him as their #2 after Joe Biden and many other organizations and surrogates have endorsed the policies and focus Bernie has put to issues plaguing the african american community in particular, not to mention the latino community. 

 

1. That's not important.

2. Every candidate can beat Trump according to polls. I saw Sanders under some other candidates in some polls. 

3. Even if you can find people that agree with what you say about Pete, that still doesnt make him a racist. It makes him the equivalent of Bernie in 2016. Is Bernie a racist? Was Bernie a racist in 2016? 

Conclusion : When any organisation uses dirty political attacks, condemn them all, not only when Bernie is the target.