MSNBC on Warren/Sanders exchange, CNN debate painful & bizarre

[lego 44,165]

8 minutes ago, LibraLove said:

Hillary staffers

 

 

 

 

 

[Bt1 5,213]

7 minutes ago, LibraLove said:

What the script said was absolutely true and based in reality when you actually delve into each candidate's demographics. Warren's has time and time again proven to be people who "are highly-educated, more affluent people" (as the script said). They're also whiter. That's just the make-up of her base and in no way "trashing" her as she said.

 

This is literally how campaigns work. This is part of the persuasion phase that campaigns of any size do right before Get Out the Vote. She knows this. Her team knows this. Yet they decided to go nuclear over something everyone does and spread a salacious, indeterminate rumor as some sort of petty revenge because a good percentage of her staff is made up of bitter former Hillary staffers that have this unhealthy and almost obsessive hatred of him.

I'm sorry but I've had this discussion already. I will only say that you dont know what deal they had and if that script violated the deal. 

[Sanju 1,504]

5 minutes ago, Florin said:

I dont agree with your perspective, but it's your opinion. The thing is that what I say remains valid even if what you say is truth.

And you can find even more perspectives around this subject. Want another one? This isnt about Warren and Bernie. It's about MSNBC attacking CNN. 

You are strictly saying that on the basis that Bernie supporters are "praising" MSMBC for this particular topic. Thats false, True progressives have called them out on being part of the establishment/being corrupt for years. You are overlooking that fact to  validate your point on this specific case. 

We can agree to disagree on the matters of warren vs sanders. That is par for the course, but the fact that news media outlets are blatantly being bias is an issue and you can't deny that.

[LibraLove 1,282]

6 minutes ago, Florin said:

I'm sorry but I've had this discussion already. I will only say that you dont know what deal they had and if that script violated the deal. 

So saying something that's true and very very very mild compared as to what was said about Biden and Buttigieg is grounds for spreading a salacious, unsubstantiated, rumor like it's gospel? Nothing in that script attacked her character like what her campaign did. It simply discussed who they are appealing to, which is fact, in order to attract voters. That's how campaigns work. Her campaign way overreacted and has sown unnecessary division in the party.

[Bt1 5,213]

Just now, ComeToJoe said:

You are strictly saying that on the basis that Bernie supporters are "praising" MSMBC for this particular topic. Thats false, True progressives have called them out on being part of the establishment/being corrupt for years. You are overlooking that fact to  validate your point on this specific case. 
 

Maybe I am just tired but I dont get it. 

U want to talk about possible corruption in mainstream media? 

 

[Bt1 5,213]

6 minutes ago, LibraLove said:

So saying something that's true and very very very mild compared as to what was said about Biden and Buttigieg is grounds for spreading a salacious, unsubstantiated, rumor like it's gospel? Nothing in that script attacked her character like what her campaign did. It simply discussed who they are appealing to, which is fact, in order to attract voters. That's how campaigns work. Her campaign way overreacted and has sown unnecessary division in the party.

Maybe. I cant know if her campaign was just looking for a justification to start this or if she felt betrayed. 

[LibraLove 1,282]

Just now, Florin said:

Maybe. I cant know if her campaign was just looking for a justification to start this or if she felt betrayed. 

Lol. Okay. It was definitely a set up to try to damage him and help someone. Whether that was her or Biden, who knows. But it's going to backfire hysterically on her.