Jump to content
Mayhem Requiem
science

Australia is still burning


Biggest Bitch

Featured Posts

Biggest Bitch

 

So far at least 17 people and more than 500 millon animals have died, more than 1,200 homes have been destroyed and 5.5 million hectares of land has been burnt. 

 

FB-IMG-1578131503194.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131536692.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131511221.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131513848.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131520395.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131526378.jpg

 

FB-IMG-1578131506201.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

It's so fkd ! One of our beach houses is under threat :ohno: 

Praying the cool weather and expected rain helps a lot.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Temptation

Over 200 arsonists have been arrested for starting the fires, including a teenager volunteer firefighter, but the media isn’t reporting on it because it goes against their agenda (i’m not denying climate change btw, just skeptical of the ones who are using the issue to further their own agenda - there is way more to the story).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chromatislaps

Okay, it's time we fcking fine oil companies for their  neglectance of the climate... they are the cause of all this bullshit

fcking publicly shame the CEOs of those companies... I'm done :grr:#metoo them 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu

Will australia finally stop being denialist about climate change and start actually taking action?

It has one of the worst records on climate change action among western countries (I think even the U.S is doing better when it's not governed by morons)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Temptation
35 minutes ago, Chickens in Malibu said:

Will australia finally stop being denialist about climate change and start actually taking action?

It has one of the worst records on climate change action among western countries (I think even the U.S is doing better when it's not governed by morons)

No, Australia is not in denial about the problem. It disagrees with the radical solutions proposed by the Greens Party, such as their repugnant banning of essential backburning and hazard reduction, which have actually created this disaster.

They claim that land clearing (which is a skill inherited from thousands of years of Aboriginal fire management) kills animals; but then by leaving behind such a heavy fuel load (eucalyptus trees are HIGHLY flammable, moreso during drought) on the environment they have killed 500 million animals.

Truly evil. The Greens have blood on their hands. They are the opposite of what they claim to be, and the quiet Australians implicitly know this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sarahb
1 hour ago, Lord Temptation said:

No, Australia is not in denial about the problem. It disagrees with the radical solutions proposed by the Greens Party, such as their repugnant banning of essential backburning and hazard reduction, which have actually created this disaster.

They claim that land clearing (which is a skill inherited from thousands of years of Aboriginal fire management) kills animals; but then by leaving behind such a heavy fuel load (eucalyptus trees are HIGHLY flammable, moreso during drought) on the environment they have killed 500 million animals.

Truly evil. The Greens have blood on their hands. They are the opposite of what they claim to be, and the quiet Australians implicitly know this.

'This is The Green's fault'. Seriously? The party with one seat and have never been in power? Stop listening to Barnaby Joyce. There is zero evidence this is because the Greens tried to prevent back burning. They didn't ban anything.  
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/12/is-there-really-a-green-conspiracy-to-stop-bushfire-hazard-reduction

6m8q37jgiq841.jpg?width=487&auto=webp&s=

Do you feel him sir?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Lord Temptation
22 minutes ago, sarahb said:

'This is The Green's fault'. Seriously? The party with one seat and have never been in power? Stop listening to Barnaby Joyce. There is zero evidence this is because the Greens tried to prevent back burning. They didn't ban anything.  
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/nov/12/is-there-really-a-green-conspiracy-to-stop-bushfire-hazard-reduction

6m8q37jgiq841.jpg?width=487&auto=webp&s=

If it weren’t for the Greens KILLING the Labor Party’s carbon emissions trading scheme in 2009 (in collusion with the Liberal Party) Australia would be the world leaders today in climate change renewal. No, they’re green-eyed evil.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gov Hooka
14 hours ago, Lord Temptation said:

Over 200 arsonists have been arrested for starting the fires, including a teenager volunteer firefighter, but the media isn’t reporting on it because it goes against their agenda (i’m not denying climate change btw, just skeptical of the ones who are using the issue to further their own agenda - there is way more to the story).

here come the rightwing conspiracy theories

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gov Hooka
13 hours ago, Lord Temptation said:

No, Australia is not in denial about the problem. It disagrees with the radical solutions proposed by the Greens Party, such as their repugnant banning of essential backburning and hazard reduction, which have actually created this disaster.

They claim that land clearing (which is a skill inherited from thousands of years of Aboriginal fire management) kills animals; but then by leaving behind such a heavy fuel load (eucalyptus trees are HIGHLY flammable, moreso during drought) on the environment they have killed 500 million animals.

Truly evil. The Greens have blood on their hands. They are the opposite of what they claim to be, and the quiet Australians implicitly know this.

Nah the people with blood on their hands are delusional twits like you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...