Bradley Cooper Shmoikn' Jenifer Garner

[Woolfsmck 2,763]

https://celebrityinsider-org.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/celebrityinsider.org/amp/is-jennifer-garner-pregnant-and-dating-bradley-cooper-308058/?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From %1%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fcelebrityinsider.org%2Fis-jennifer-garner-pregnant-and-dating-bradley-cooper-308058%2F

 

Jennifer Garner and Bradley Cooper have sparked dating rumors since the two starred in Alias together. Now that Bradley Cooper has split from Irina Shayk, those rumors have resurfaced, only this time there’s a twist. Not only are some people convinced that Bradley and Jennifer are an item, but there are also rumors that people believe Jennifer is pregnant with Bradley’s baby. Not too long ago, rumors were rampant that Bradley and Lady Gaga were a couple and she was pregnant and moving in his New York condo.

🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

 

Seems like every 'rumor' has Bradley gettn' so n so pregnant....

In a NY apt.

Later in the article it has some better diatribe.

"

It appears that Bradley Cooper and Jennifer Garner are indeed good friends, but that’s about it. 

"

 

I think the tabloids are fine because they give fans some taste of their stars...

But harmful false articles really need to be left off the stand.

[Delusional 9,221]

Gaga and bradley’s PR teams looking at the press like:

[dit 46,518]

I always thot Jennifer Gardner would make a good beard

[Zander 14,911]

Bradley is known to be a bit of serial dater, dating somebody new within a month or so after breaking up with someone previously. 

[LGMonster95 13,704]

Bradley has left Irina, Gaga and Garner pregnant in the past 3-4 months according to tabloids.....for the love of f*ck

[thatfoxyfeeling 13,038]

32 minutes ago, LGMonster95 said:

Bradley has left Irina, Gaga and Garner pregnant in the past 3-4 months according to tabloids.....for the love of f*ck

He can impregnate me next. 

[misunderstood 8,736]

Shmoikn'

[StrawberryBlond 14,921]

Heat magazine was saying in this week's issue that he and Gaga are having covert dates and spending nights at her house having "long cosy days under covers" and "as her house is so private and on many acres of land, nobody notices them entering and leaving." For a magazine that usually has it right when it comes to intuition with this stuff and doesn't have sensationalist headlines that are blatantly untrue, they've had it so wrong when it comes to these two. I almost think they don't bother looking too deeply into stories involving American celebrities and just do surface level assumptions. Stuff like that is actually quite damning and the only reason that it won't be found out is because it's a UK publication, which American celebrities won't be reading (they have made occasional retractions apologising in later issues but only for matters involving UK celebrities who obviously read it). That's the kind of claim that you could sue for. "Cosy days under covers?" Inappropriate to the max when it's something you have zero proof for. I hope those photos of her kissing Dan Horton this week make them sheepishly retreat with these falsehoods.

[Guest Adarsh]

Omg I’m so dumb, ignore me 

[CannaeDrive 3,412]

That PR campaign is doing just fine, thank you very much 

[CautiousLurker 19,476]

Nnnnnnnnnnn, he was supposed to impregnate Gaga with LG6, and he's already cheating on her? 

Btw, when you google impregnate definition, this is the first definition you get:

impregnate

/ˈɪmprɛɡneɪt/

verb

1. soak or saturate (something) with a substance.

I DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS THE MAIN USE OF THE WORD 
I guess I've been impregnating my chicken with sauce for the past 12 hours, and later in the evening I'll impregnate my c*um towel with... *sigh*... even I'm a bit grossed out now

[Lighter 15,376]

A Star Is Born The Ultimate Mega Super Extended Director Cut promo cancelled

[Woolfsmck 2,763]

1 hour ago, StrawberryBlond said:

Heat magazine was saying in this week's issue that he and Gaga are having covert dates and spending nights at her house having "long cosy days under covers" and "as her house is so private and on many acres of land, nobody notices them entering and leaving." For a magazine that usually has it right when it comes to intuition with this stuff and doesn't have sensationalist headlines that are blatantly untrue, they've had it so wrong when it comes to these two. I almost think they don't bother looking too deeply into stories involving American celebrities and just do surface level assumptions. Stuff like that is actually quite damning and the only reason that it won't be found out is because it's a UK publication, which American celebrities won't be reading (they have made occasional retractions apologising in later issues but only for matters involving UK celebrities who obviously read it). That's the kind of claim that you could sue for. "Cosy days under covers?" Inappropriate to the max when it's something you have zero proof for. I hope those photos of her kissing Dan Horton this week make them sheepishly retreat with these falsehoods.

If they want this public , then it will be 

They are sayn' otherwise and that's gotta be good enough.

[StrawberryBlond 14,921]

6 minutes ago, Woolfsmck said:

If they want this public , then it will be 

They are sayn' otherwise and that's gotta be good enough.

Fact is that they aren't being pictured together, not publicly or covertly. That should be enough. Whenever affairs have gone down, we usually know about it before the movie's even out and they normally get together mere weeks afterwards. ASIB stopped showing in cinemas months ago and both parties are doing their own thing now. Now that Bradley's officially broken up and Gaga was single at the time, there's no need to keep it secret anymore if true. But Gaga made it clear that she's moving on with that kiss and it was probably a tactic to make the press back off with rumours. I swear, it seemed like they weren't going to stop until they actually got together.

[Woolfsmck 2,763]

31 minutes ago, StrawberryBlond said:

Fact is that they aren't being pictured together, not publicly or covertly. That should be enough. Whenever affairs have gone down, we usually know about it before the movie's even out and they normally get together mere weeks afterwards. ASIB stopped showing in cinemas months ago and both parties are doing their own thing now. Now that Bradley's officially broken up and Gaga was single at the time, there's no need to keep it secret anymore if true. But Gaga made it clear that she's moving on with that kiss and it was probably a tactic to make the press back off with rumours. I swear, it seemed like they weren't going to stop until they actually got together.

I hear ya..

Referring to previous beau's ,,, both have been public enough with the media as to remove any doubt or rumour.