AmericanxDream 2,049 Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 Sometimes too much freedom can be a bad thing. I think she needs a label to tell her what to do, otherwise she'd just release a bunch of ARTPOPs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr.peter 3,542 Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 You guys would hate her even more if she was independent truly be careful what you wish for Low budget videos Low budget promotion ect ect Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJRocketMan 2,684 Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 33 minutes ago, Oshawott said: Sometimes too much freedom can be a bad thing. I think she needs a label to tell her what to do, otherwise she'd just release a bunch of ARTPOPs. In that case, bring on the ARTPOPs! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harris Walz 2024 1,451 Posted July 4, 2019 Share Posted July 4, 2019 I doubt she would. She enjoys the benefit of a major label. Big sponsors rarely, if ever, support independent artists. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OMonster 14,573 Posted July 4, 2019 Author Share Posted July 4, 2019 33 minutes ago, AllThingsGaga said: I doubt she would. She enjoys the benefit of a major label. Big sponsors rarely, if ever, support independent artists. I think an independent Gaga would still have the same brand gravitas as a signed Gaga, though. What brand wouldn't want the exposure Gaga could give them? If anything, independence for an artist of Gaga's calibre would be a corporate dream. No middle-man, no percentage cuts, no conflicting sponsors / affiliations... just a bilateral agreement. subtext / fantasy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.